The Use of Clevidipine for Hypertension in Pediatric Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support.

May Wu, Kathleen R Ryan, David N Rosenthal, Ozzie Jahadi, Jeffrey Moss, David M Kwiatkowski
Author Information
  1. May Wu: Department of Pharmacy, Stanford Children's Health, Palo Alto, CA.
  2. Kathleen R Ryan: Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
  3. David N Rosenthal: Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
  4. Ozzie Jahadi: Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
  5. Jeffrey Moss: Department of Pharmacy, Stanford Children's Health, Palo Alto, CA.
  6. David M Kwiatkowski: Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist regarding the management of hypertension in pediatric patients on mechanical circulatory support. Hypertension is a known risk factor for stroke and low cardiac output in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support and a narrow therapeutic window of blood pressure is often targeted. Traditional short-acting infusions to treat hypertension, such as sodium nitroprusside, may lead to accumulation of toxic metabolites in patients with renal dysfunction. Our primary objective was to describe use of clevidipine, a continuous short-acting calcium channel blocking medication, for blood pressure control in pediatric patients on mechanical circulatory support.
DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: A 26-bed quaternary cardiovascular ICU in a university-based pediatric hospital in California.
PATIENTS: Mechanical circulatory support patients admitted to cardiovascular ICU who received clevidipine infusions between October 1, 2016, and March 31, 2019.
INTERVENTIONS: Clevidipine infusion.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from a cohort of 38 patients who received a total of 45 clevidipine infusions were reviewed. The cohort had a median age of 2.7 years and included neonates. No patient had record of hypotensive events, code events, or received low-dose epinephrine or code-dosed epinephrine related to a clevidipine infusion. Median duration of clevidipine infusion was 4.1 days (1.5-9.2 d). Eleven patients transitioned from clevidipine to enteral antihypertensive agents, and 26 clevidipine infusions were administered as a single agent without sodium nitroprusside. Seven patients were switched from sodium nitroprusside to clevidipine to avoid cyanide toxicity, a majority of whom had elevated serum creatinine.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pediatric cardiac cohort, clevidipine infusions were effective at hypertension management and were not associated with hypotensive or code events. This report details the largest cohort and longest duration of clevidipine administration within a pediatric population and did not demonstrate hypotensive events, even among neonatal populations. Clevidipine may be a reasonable cost-effective alternative antihypertensive medication compared to traditional short-acting agents.

References

  1. Keating GM. Clevidipine: A review of its use for managing blood pressure in perioperative and intensive care settings. Drugs. 2014; 74:1947–1960
  2. Clevidipine. Drugs R&D. 2002; 3:190–192
  3. Espinosa A, Ripollés-Melchor J, Casans-Francés R, et al. Perioperative use of clevidipine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 28:1–16
  4. NITROPRESS (sodium nitroprusside) [package insert]. McPherson, KS: Hospira. 2016
  5. Moffett BS, Price JF. Evaluation of sodium nitroprusside toxicity in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42:1600–1604
  6. Freiberger NA, Tellor KB, Stevens AM. Comparison of clevidipine versus sodium nitroprusside for the treatment of postoperative hypertension in cardiac surgery patients. Hosp Pharm. 2016; 51:461–467
  7. Ulici A, Jancik J, Lam TS, et al. Clevidipine versus sodium nitroprusside in acute aortic dissection: A retrospective chart review. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35:1514–1518
  8. Clevidipine (Systemic). Lexi-Drugs. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp. 2019
  9. Tobias JD, Schechter WS, Phillips A, et al. Clevidipine for perioperative blood pressure control in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 16:55–60
  10. Kaur H, Nattanamai P, Qualls KE. Propofol and clevidipine-induced hypertriglyceridemia. Cureus. 2018; 10:e3165
  11. Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS, et al.; ELSO member centers. Pediatric extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017; 63:456–463
  12. Rosenthal DN, Almond CS, Jaquiss RD, et al. Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35:569–577
  13. Davis RL, Eastman D, McPhillips H, et al. Risks of congenital malformations and perinatal events among infants exposed to calcium channel and beta-blockers during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011; 20:138–145
  14. Kovacs CS. Calcium, phosphorus, and bone metabolism in the fetus and newborn. Early Hum Dev. 2015; 91:623–628
  15. Thomas TC, Smith JM, White PC, et al. Transient neonatal hypocalcemia: Presentation and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2012; 129:e1461–e1467
  16. Cruz JE, Thomas Z, Lee D, et al. Therapeutic interchange of clevidipine for sodium nitroprusside in cardiac surgery. P T. 2016; 41:635–639
  17. CLEVIPREX (clevidipine emulsion) [package insert]. Graz, Austria: Fresienus Kabi. 2018
  18. INTRALIPID (intralipid emulsion) [package insert]. Uppsala, Sweden: Fresienus Kabi. 2016

MeSH Term

Antihypertensive Agents
Blood Pressure
Calcium Channel Blockers
Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Hypertension
Infant, Newborn
Pyridines
Retrospective Studies

Chemicals

Antihypertensive Agents
Calcium Channel Blockers
Pyridines
clevidipine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clevidipinepatientspediatricinfusionscohortcirculatorysupporteventshypertensionmechanicalshort-actingsodiumnitroprussidereceived1ClevidipineinfusionhypotensivemanagementHypertensioncardiacbloodpressuremaymedicationcardiovascularICUMechanical2codeepinephrinedurationantihypertensiveagentsOBJECTIVES:LimiteddataexistregardingknownriskfactorstrokelowoutputrequiringnarrowtherapeuticwindowoftentargetedTraditionaltreatleadaccumulationtoxicmetabolitesrenaldysfunctionprimaryobjectivedescribeusecontinuouscalciumchannelblockingcontrolDESIGN:Single-centerretrospectivestudySETTING:26-bedquaternaryuniversity-basedhospitalCaliforniaPATIENTS:admittedOctober2016March312019INTERVENTIONS:MEASUREMENTSANDMAINRESULTS:Data38total45reviewedmedianage7yearsincludedneonatespatientrecordlow-dosecode-dosedrelatedMedian4days5-9dEleventransitionedenteral26administeredsingleagentwithoutSevenswitchedavoidcyanidetoxicitymajorityelevatedserumcreatinineCONCLUSIONS:effectiveassociatedreportdetailslargestlongestadministrationwithinpopulationdemonstrateevenamongneonatalpopulationsreasonablecost-effectivealternativecomparedtraditionalUsePediatricPatientsReceivingCirculatorySupport

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)