Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6.

Roland Séférian, Sarah Berthet, Andrew Yool, Julien Palmiéri, Laurent Bopp, Alessandro Tagliabue, Lester Kwiatkowski, Olivier Aumont, James Christian, John Dunne, Marion Gehlen, Tatiana Ilyina, Jasmin G John, Hongmei Li, Matthew C Long, Jessica Y Luo, Hideyuki Nakano, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Charles Stock, Yeray Santana-Falcón, Yohei Takano, Jerry Tjiputra, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Michio Watanabe, Tongwen Wu, Fanghua Wu, Akitomo Yamamoto
Author Information
  1. Roland Séférian: CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France. ORCID
  2. Sarah Berthet: CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France. ORCID
  3. Andrew Yool: National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH UK. ORCID
  4. Julien Palmiéri: National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH UK. ORCID
  5. Laurent Bopp: LMD-IPSL, Ecole Normale Supérieure / Université PSL, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, PSL University, Paris, France. ORCID
  6. Alessandro Tagliabue: School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. ORCID
  7. Lester Kwiatkowski: LOCEAN Laboratory, Sorbonne Université-CNRS-IRD-MNHN, Paris, France. ORCID
  8. Olivier Aumont: LOCEAN Laboratory, Sorbonne Université-CNRS-IRD-MNHN, Paris, France. ORCID
  9. James Christian: Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Victoria, BC Canada. ORCID
  10. John Dunne: NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ USA. ORCID
  11. Marion Gehlen: LSCE-IPSL, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. ORCID
  12. Tatiana Ilyina: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. ORCID
  13. Jasmin G John: NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ USA. ORCID
  14. Hongmei Li: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. ORCID
  15. Matthew C Long: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO USA. ORCID
  16. Jessica Y Luo: NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ USA. ORCID
  17. Hideyuki Nakano: JMA Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan. ORCID
  18. Anastasia Romanou: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, USA. ORCID
  19. Jörg Schwinger: NORCE Climate, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway. ORCID
  20. Charles Stock: NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ USA. ORCID
  21. Yeray Santana-Falcón: CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France. ORCID
  22. Yohei Takano: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. ORCID
  23. Jerry Tjiputra: NORCE Climate, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway. ORCID
  24. Hiroyuki Tsujino: JMA Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan. ORCID
  25. Michio Watanabe: Research Center for Environmental Modeling and Application, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan. ORCID
  26. Tongwen Wu: Beijing Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China. ORCID
  27. Fanghua Wu: Beijing Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China. ORCID
  28. Akitomo Yamamoto: Research Center for Environmental Modeling and Application, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan. ORCID

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The changes or updates in ocean biogeochemistry component have been mapped between CMIP5 and CMIP6 model versions, and an assessment made of how far these have led to improvements in the simulated mean state of marine biogeochemical models within the current generation of Earth system models (ESMs).
Recent Findings: The representation of marine biogeochemistry has progressed within the current generation of Earth system models. However, it remains difficult to identify which model updates are responsible for a given improvement. In addition, the full potential of marine biogeochemistry in terms of Earth system interactions and climate feedback remains poorly examined in the current generation of Earth system models.
Summary: Increasing availability of ocean biogeochemical data, as well as an improved understanding of the underlying processes, allows advances in the marine biogeochemical components of the current generation of ESMs. The present study scrutinizes the extent to which marine biogeochemistry components of ESMs have progressed between the 5th and the 6th phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP).

Keywords

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0marinebiogeochemistrymodelscurrentgenerationEarthsystemCMIP5CMIP6biogeochemicalESMsupdatesoceanmodelwithinprogressedremainscomponentsModelMarineBiogeochemistryPurposeReview:changescomponentmappedversionsassessmentmadefarledimprovementssimulatedmeanstateRecentFindings:representationHoweverdifficultidentifyresponsiblegivenimprovementadditionfullpotentialtermsinteractionsclimatefeedbackpoorlyexaminedSummary:Increasingavailabilitydatawellimprovedunderstandingunderlyingprocessesallowsadvancespresentstudyscrutinizesextent5th6thphasesCoupledIntercomparisonProjectCMIPTrackingImprovementSimulatedBiogeochemistry-ClimateFeedbacksPerformance

Similar Articles

Cited By