COVID-19 pandemic: a double trouble for Indian adolescents and young adults living with type 1 diabetes.

Neha Agarwal, Mandara Harikar, Rishi Shukla, Anurag Bajpai
Author Information
  1. Neha Agarwal: GROW Society, Growth and Obesity Workforce, Kanpur, India.
  2. Mandara Harikar: Independent researcher, Rishikesh, India. ORCID
  3. Rishi Shukla: GROW Society, Growth and Obesity Workforce, Kanpur, India.
  4. Anurag Bajpai: GROW Society, Growth and Obesity Workforce, Kanpur, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strict isolation measures and interrupted health care services during the COVID 19 pandemic are contemplated to instigate stress universally, particularly in those with chronic illnesses such as type 1 diabetes (T1D).
METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational study was done to assess determinants of stress and its impact on glycemic control in adolescents and young adults (aged 12-24 years) living with T1D in India. An online, semi-structured survey including Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was distributed and results were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (46 males, mean age 19.61 ± 3.8 years) with T1D completed the survey. Age ( = 0.325,  = 0.005) and HBA1C level within the preceding 3 months ( = 0.274,  = 0.036) correlated positively with PSS-10 scores. There was a statistically significant difference in PSS-10 score based on gender ((70) = - 2.147;  = 0.035), education ( (4,67) = 4.34,  = 0.003), and occupation ((3,68) = 4.50,  = .006). On multiple linear regression, gender, occupation, and HbA1C were the significant determinants of PSS-10 ((3,55) = 12.01,  < 0.001,  = 0.363). One-way ANOVA showed a significant impact of mean PSS-10 score on the glycemic control ((2,69) = 3.813,  = 0.027).
CONCLUSION: An increased prevalence of stress was seen among Indian adolescents and young adults living with T1D. Female gender, salaried individuals, and pre-existing poorly controlled diabetes contributed to an increased risk of stress. Increased stress resulted in worsened glycemic control.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Dec;13(6):795-804 [PMID: 24072479]
  2. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jun;22(6):462-467 [PMID: 32421355]
  3. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;67:144-145 [PMID: 32381270]
  4. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(6):1369-1379 [PMID: 32395187]
  5. Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1660-1671 [PMID: 27425009]
  6. JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):707-708 [PMID: 31971553]
  7. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231924 [PMID: 32298385]
  8. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):696-704 [PMID: 30294583]
  9. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 May 12;: [PMID: 32396400]
  10. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976 [PMID: 32202646]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1157-1163 [PMID: 29599295]
  12. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471 [PMID: 32355299]
  13. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004 Apr-May;29(3):171-84 [PMID: 15131135]
  14. Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1315 [PMID: 32334687]
  15. Cureus. 2017 Oct 23;9(10):e1792 [PMID: 29282437]
  16. J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 24;9(2): [PMID: 31991628]
  17. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  18. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;35(12):1466-1467 [PMID: 32364283]
  19. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Sep 1;174(9):819-820 [PMID: 32286618]
  20. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):2023-2026 [PMID: 32307319]
  21. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 8;14(10):e0223431 [PMID: 31593574]
  22. Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 19;91(1):157-160 [PMID: 32191675]
  23. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112954 [PMID: 32325383]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5): [PMID: 32155789]
  25. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;66(5):504-511 [PMID: 32380879]
  26. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Oct;19 Suppl 27:262-274 [PMID: 30079595]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0 = 0PSS-10stressdiabetesT1D1glycemiccontroladolescentsyoungadultslivingsignificantgender19typedeterminantsimpactsurveymeanscore = 4occupation3increasedIndianCOVID-19BACKGROUND:StrictisolationmeasuresinterruptedhealthcareservicesCOVIDpandemiccontemplatedinstigateuniversallyparticularlychronicillnessesMETHODS:cross-sectionalobservationalstudydoneassessaged12-24 yearsIndiaonlinesemi-structuredincludingPerceivedStressScaledistributedresultsanalyzedRESULTS:total89participants46malesage61 ± 38 yearscompletedAge325005HBA1Clevelwithinpreceding3 months274036correlatedpositivelyscoresstatisticallydifferencebased70 = - 2147035education467340036850 = 006multiplelinearregressionHbA1C55 = 1201< 0001363One-wayANOVAshowed269 = 3813027CONCLUSION:prevalenceseenamongFemalesalariedindividualspre-existingpoorlycontrolledcontributedriskIncreasedresultedworsenedpandemic:doubletroubleAdolescentType

Similar Articles

Cited By