Do wild raccoons (Procyon lotor) use tools?

F Blake Morton
Author Information
  1. F Blake Morton: Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. b.morton@hull.ac.uk. ORCID

Abstract

Being able to make and use tools was once considered to be an evolutionary hallmark of our species, but has since been documented in other animals. However, for reasons that remain unclear, not all species naturally use tools. Racoons (Procyon lotor) are generalist carnivores that possess many of the physical, cognitive, and behavioural characteristics linked to tool use in other species (e.g. manual dexterity, tactile exploration, relatively large brains, extractive foraging, and sociality). Although raccoons have not been observed using tools outside of experimental captive conditions, wild data involving objective psychometric tests are needed. The current study administered a tool-related task to a wild population of raccoons from 20 locations within the Croatan National Forest, USA. The task required participants to use a stick to extract food from a pipe. To facilitate interpretations of their performances on the task, data were obtained on natural tool availability at the field site and participants' mode of exploring the novel task. None of the participants solved the task despite natural sticks (suitable for solving the task) being widely available across testing locations. Participants were equally likely to smell versus handle novel sticks, which were provided at testing platforms. Limited tactile exploration, but not tool availability, could be at least one factor that reduces these raccoons' opportunities to interact with and learn about novel tools like sticks.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Brain Res. 1999 Feb 15;99(1):35-44 [PMID: 10512570]
  2. Am J Primatol. 2004 Dec;64(4):359-66 [PMID: 15580579]
  3. Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1909 [PMID: 15591195]
  4. Front Neuroanat. 2017 Dec 12;11:118 [PMID: 29311850]
  5. Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):725-30 [PMID: 22367156]
  6. Anim Cogn. 2006 Jul;9(3):193-9 [PMID: 16612632]
  7. Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):153-65 [PMID: 22209954]
  8. Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):225-31 [PMID: 17171360]
  9. J Comp Psychol. 1995 Mar;109(1):52-60 [PMID: 7705062]
  10. PLoS One. 2008 Mar 26;3(3):e1860 [PMID: 18365015]
  11. Chem Senses. 2019 Oct 17;44(8):639-648 [PMID: 31363734]
  12. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Mar;2(3):441-444 [PMID: 29358606]
  13. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2007 Jan;143(1):1-4 [PMID: 18018998]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2017 Nov;20(6):1147-1152 [PMID: 28963599]
  15. J Reprod Dev. 2013;59(4):361-7 [PMID: 23603783]
  16. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Aug;54:439-41 [PMID: 13770277]
  17. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 [PMID: 18839484]
  18. Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 16;5:11356 [PMID: 26079292]
  19. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20231 [PMID: 21687666]
  20. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 24;9(1):9174 [PMID: 31235806]
  21. Curr Biol. 2010 Dec 7;20(23):R1032-9 [PMID: 21145022]
  22. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 07;368(1630):20120408 [PMID: 24101619]
  23. Evolution. 1972 Sep;26(3):464-473 [PMID: 28563061]
  24. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Mar;132(3):426-44 [PMID: 17177182]
  25. Nat Commun. 2012;3:980 [PMID: 22864573]
  26. Anim Cogn. 2019 May;22(3):387-396 [PMID: 30805799]
  27. J Hum Evol. 1999 Jun;36(6):719-41 [PMID: 10330335]
  28. Zh Obshch Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb;74(1):23-33 [PMID: 23659111]
  29. Am J Primatol. 2015 Oct;77(10):1109-21 [PMID: 26119509]
  30. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 10;8(10):e75830 [PMID: 24130746]
  31. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 07;368(1630):20120416 [PMID: 24101626]
  32. Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):423-30 [PMID: 18183433]

MeSH Term

Animals
Learning
Raccoons

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0taskusetoolsspeciestoolraccoonswildnovelsticksProcyonlotortactileexplorationdatalocationsparticipantsnaturalavailabilitytestingablemakeconsideredevolutionaryhallmarksincedocumentedanimalsHoweverreasonsremainunclearnaturallyRacoonsgeneralistcarnivorespossessmanyphysicalcognitivebehaviouralcharacteristicslinkedegmanualdexterityrelativelylargebrainsextractiveforagingsocialityAlthoughobservedusingoutsideexperimentalcaptiveconditionsinvolvingobjectivepsychometrictestsneededcurrentstudyadministeredtool-relatedpopulation20withinCroatanNationalForestUSArequiredstickextractfoodpipefacilitateinterpretationsperformancesobtainedfieldsiteparticipants'modeexploringNonesolveddespitesuitablesolvingwidelyavailableacrossParticipantsequallylikelysmellversushandleprovidedplatformsLimitedleastonefactorreducesraccoons'opportunitiesinteractlearnliketools?CognitiveevolutionCultureInnovationOpportunityPhysicalcognitionTechnicalintelligence

Similar Articles

Cited By