Comfort and safety of bronchoscopy performed under sedation and local anesthesia in elderly patients.

Naotaka Noda, Makiko Hara, Shinji Ise, Mizuko Ose, Miyoko Tatsuta, Aiko Nagaoka, Miiru Izumi, Kentaro Wakamatsu, Masayuki Kawasaki
Author Information
  1. Naotaka Noda: Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Omuta National Hospital, 1044-1 Tachibana, Omuta City, Fukuoka, Japan.

Abstract

Although sedation for bronchoscopy improves patient comfort, there is a risk of oversedation in elderly patients. Only a few studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of sedation for bronchoscopy in elderly patients.This study retrospectively analyzed records of 210 patients who underwent transbronchial brushing and/or biopsy under midazolam sedation at National Hospital Organization Omuta National Hospital between June 2017 and October 2019. Patients were administered 1 mg midazolam following 10 mL 4% lidocaine inhalation. When sedation was insufficient, 0.5 mg midazolam was administered additionally. Diagnostic yield, incidence of complications, amount of oxygen supplementation, decreases in percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2), changes in blood pressure, and degree of comfort were analyzed.Patients were divided into the elderly (n = 102) and non-elderly (n = 108) groups. No significant differences were observed in diagnostic yield and procedure time between the 2 groups, and no severe adverse events were noted in the elderly group. The degree of comfort during bronchoscopy was significantly higher in the elderly group. In patients administered < 2 mg midazolam, the amount of oxygen supplementation and decreases in SpO2 were significantly smaller in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group.The risk of adverse events related to midazolam sedation in bronchoscopy does not increase with age, and sedation improves comfort during flexible bronchoscopy in elderly patients. Moreover, a total dose of midazolam <2 mg is safe for elderly patients undergoing bronchoscopy.

References

  1. Putinati S, Ballerin L, Corbetta L, et al. Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for bronchoscopy. Chest 1999;115:1437–40.
  2. Maltais F, Laberge F, Laviolette M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorazepam as premedication for bronchoscopy. Chest 1996;109:1195–8. DOI:10.1378/chest.109.5.1195. [DOI: 10.1378/chest.109.5.1195]
  3. Horinouchi H, Asano F, Okubo K, et al. Current status of diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy in Japan: 2016 national survey of bronchoscopy. Respir Investig 2019;57:238–44.
  4. Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, et al. British thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults. Thorax 2013;68: (Suppl 1): i1–44.
  5. Morris LG, Zeitler DM, Amin MR. Unsedated flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the resident clinic: technique and patient satisfaction. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1159–62.
  6. Hatton MQ, Allen MB, Vathenen AS, et al. Does sedation help in fibreoptic bronchoscopy? BMJ 1994;309:1206–7.
  7. Wahidi MM, Jain P, Jantz M, et al. American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the use of topical anesthesia, analgesia, and sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in adult patients. Chest 2011;140:1342–50.
  8. O’Hickey S, Hilton AM. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the elderly. Age Ageing 1987;16:229–33.
  9. Knox AJ, Mascie-Taylor BH, Page RL. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the elderly: 4years’ experience. Br J Dis Chest 1988;82:290–3.
  10. Rokach A, Fridlender ZG, Arish N, et al. Bronchoscopy in octogenarians. Age Ageing 2008;37:710–3.
  11. Korttila K, Saarnivaara L, Tarkkanen J, et al. Effect of age on amnesia and sedation induced by flunitrazepam during local anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1978;50:1211–8.
  12. Ricardo J, José, Shahzad Shaefi, et al. Sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: current and emerging evidence. Eur Respir Rev 2013;22:106–16.
  13. Sevinc Sarinc Ulasli, Ersin Gunay, Olcay Akar, et al. Diagnostic utility of flexible bronchoscopy in elderly patients. Clin Respir J 2014;8:357–63.
  14. McLaughlin CW, Skabelund AJ, Easterling ER, et al. The safety and utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the very elderly. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2018;25:300–4.
  15. Ouellette DR, Diaz J. Elevation of the double product during flexible bronchoscopy: effects of uncontrolled hypertension and the use of beta-blockade. J Bronchology 2008;15:73–7.
  16. Davies L, Mister R, Spence DP, et al. Cardiovascular consequences of fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Eur Respir J 1997;10:695–8.
  17. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143:e142S–165S.
  18. Gaeta M, Pandolfo I, Volta S, et al. Bronchus sign on CT in peripheral carcinoma of the lung: value in predicting results of transbronchial biopsy. AJR 1991;157:1181–5.
  19. Ali MS, Sethi J, Taneja A, et al. Computed Tomography Bronchus Sign and the Diagnostic Yield of Guided Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018;15:978–87.
  20. Lechtzin N, Rubin HR, White P Jr, et al. Patient satisfaction with bronchoscopy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1326–31.
  21. Hirose T, Okuda K, Ishida H, et al. Patient satisfaction with sedation for flexible bronchoscopy. Respirology 2008;13:722–7.

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bronchoscopy
Conscious Sedation
Female
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Male
Midazolam
Oxygen
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
Patient Comfort
Retrospective Studies

Chemicals

Hypnotics and Sedatives
Midazolam
Oxygen

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0elderlysedationbronchoscopypatientsmidazolamcomfortgroupoxygenimprovesrisksafetyanalyzedNationalHospitalPatientsadministeredyieldamountsupplementationdecreasesSpO2degreenon-elderlygroupsadverseeventssignificantlyAlthoughpatientoversedationstudiesevaluatedefficacyThisstudyretrospectivelyrecords210underwenttransbronchialbrushingand/orbiopsyOrganizationOmutaJune2017October20191 mgfollowing10 mL4%lidocaineinhalationinsufficient05 mgadditionallyDiagnosticincidencecomplicationspercutaneoussaturationchangesbloodpressuredividedn = 102n = 108significantdifferencesobserveddiagnosticproceduretime2severenotedhigheradministered < 2 mgsmallercomparedTherelatedincreaseageflexibleMoreovertotaldose<2 mgsafeundergoingComfortperformedlocalanesthesia

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)