OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Annals of plastic surgery
03 01, 2021;86 (3S Suppl 2): S148-S153.

Achieving an Optimal Outcome in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Ping Song, Lee L Q Pu
Author Information
  1. Ping Song: From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
PMID: 33346542 DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002640

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Performing immediate breast reconstruction requires careful consideration of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. One of the fundamental necessities is a well-coordinated multidisciplinary team to achieve successful reconstruction. Clear and effective communication between the oncological surgeon and plastic surgeon is imperative. The treatment plan must take into account any potential neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Surgical planning and incisional approach must be carefully considered to optimize a safe oncologic surgery and ensure a viable reconstructive outcome. Furthermore, there are fundamentals to immediate breast reconstruction that must be met to obtain an aesthetically pleasing and structurally durable breast reconstruction. The goal of this article was to highlight important considerations in surgical planning and execution of immediate breast reconstruction so that an optimal outcome can be accomplished after either autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction.

References

  1. Yang RL, Newman AS, Lin IC, et al. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation. Cancer . 2013;119:2462–2468.
  2. Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S–13S.
  3. Sheckter CC, Matros E, Momeni A. Assessing value in breast reconstruction: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg . 2018;71:353–365.
  4. Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J . 2016;22:10–17.
  5. Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg . 2003;56:462–470.
  6. Bailey CR, Ogbuagu O, Baltodano PA, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes improve with nipple-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2017;140:219–226.
  7. Cano SJ, Klassen A, Pusic AL. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2009;123:98e–106e.
  8. Jagsi R, Li Y, Morrow M, et al. Patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes after breast conservation and mastectomy with and without reconstruction: results of a survey of breast cancer survivors. Ann Surg . 2015;261:1198–1206.
  9. Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol . 2015;22:361–369.
  10. Howes BH, Watson DI, Xu C, et al. Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg . 2016;69:1184–1191.
  11. Song P, Pu LLQ. Immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. In: Pu L, Karp N, eds. Atlas of Reconstructive Breast Surgery . 1st ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2020:117–127.
  12. Storm-Dickerson T, Sigalove N. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: the breast surgeon's perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2017;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):43S–48S.
  13. Lee BT, Agarwal JP, Ascherman JA, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline: autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or pedicled TRAM abdominal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2017;140:651e–664e.
  14. Codner MA, Bostwick J 3rd, Nahai F, et al. TRAM flap vascular delay for high-risk breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1995;96:1615–1622.
  15. Macadam SA, Bovill ES, Buchel EW, et al. Evidence-based medicine: autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2017;139:204e–229e.
  16. Mimoun M, Chaouat M, Lalanne B, et al. Latissimus dorsi muscle flap and tissue expansion for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg . 2006;57:597–601.
  17. Larson DL, Basir Z, Bruce T. Is oncologic safety compatible with a predictably viable mastectomy skin flap? Plast Reconstr Surg . 2011;127:27–33.
  18. Frey JD, Salibian AA, Choi M, et al. Mastectomy flap thickness and complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy: objective evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2017;5:e1439.
  19. Frey JD, Salibian AA, Choi M, et al. Optimizing outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy: mastectomy flap thickness is not one size fits all. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2019;7:e2103.
  20. Song P, Pu LLQ. Delayed two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. In: Pu L, Karp N, eds. Atlas of Reconstructive Breast Surgery . 1st ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2020:151–161.
  21. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2013;131:15–23.
  22. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2013;131:320e–326e.
  23. Sommeling CE, Van Landuyt K, Depypere H, et al. Composite breast reconstruction: implant-based breast reconstruction with adjunctive lipofilling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg . 2017;70:1051–1058.
  24. Khouri RK, Rigotti G, Khouri RK Jr., et al. Tissue-engineered breast reconstruction with Brava-assisted fat grafting: a 7-year, 488-patient, multicenter experience. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2015;135:643–658.
  25. Kolasinski J. Total breast reconstruction with fat grafting combined with internal tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2019;7:e2009.
  26. Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Kim JY. Seroma in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2016;137:1104–1116.
  27. Agarwal JP, Mendenhall SD, Anderson LA, et al. The breast reconstruction evaluation of acellular dermal matrix as a sling trial (BREASTrial): design and methods of a prospective randomized trial. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2015;135:20e–28e.
  28. Mendenhall SD, Anderson LA, Ying J, et al. The BREASTrial: stage I. Outcomes from the time of tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix placement to definitive reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2015;135:29e–42e.
  29. Schneider WJ, Hill HL Jr., Brown RG. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg . 1977;30:277–281.
  30. Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, et al. Immediate latissimus dorsi/prosthetic breast reconstruction following salvage mastectomy after failed lumpectomy/irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2008;121:159e–164e.
  31. Levine SM, Patel N, Disa JJ. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg . 2012;69:380–382.
  32. Pacella SJ, Vogel JE, Locke MB, et al. Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: a 15-year experience. Aesthet Surg J . 2011;31:190–199.

MeSH Term

Breast Neoplasms
Combined Modality Therapy
Humans
Mammaplasty
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Surgeons
Treatment Outcome
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reconstructionbreastimmediatemustsurgeonplanningoutcomeABSTRACT:PerformingrequirescarefulconsiderationpreoperativeintraoperativepostoperativefactorsOnefundamentalnecessitieswell-coordinatedmultidisciplinaryteamachievesuccessfulCleareffectivecommunicationoncologicalplasticimperativetreatmentplantakeaccountpotentialneoadjuvantadjuvanttherapiesSurgicalincisionalapproachcarefullyconsideredoptimizesafeoncologicsurgeryensureviablereconstructiveFurthermorefundamentalsmetobtainaestheticallypleasingstructurallydurablegoalarticlehighlightimportantconsiderationssurgicalexecutionoptimalcanaccomplishedeitherautologousimplant-basedAchievingOptimalOutcomeImmediateBreastReconstruction

Similar Articles

Cited By