Edge-preserving adaptive autoregressive model for Poisson noise reduction.

Reijo Takalo, Heli Hytti, Heimo Ihalainen, Antti Sohlberg
Author Information
  1. Reijo Takalo: Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu.
  2. Heli Hytti: Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere.
  3. Heimo Ihalainen: Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Automation Technology and Mechanical Engineering, Tampere University, Tampere.
  4. Antti Sohlberg: Laboratory of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Joint Authority for P��ij��t-H��me Social and Health Care, Lahti, Finland.

Abstract

Autoregressive models in image processing are linear prediction models that split an image into a predicted (i.e. filtered) image and a prediction error image, which extracts data on the image edges. Edge separation is a crucial feature of an autoregressive model. Data on the edges can be processed in different ways and then added to the filtered image. Another basic feature of our method is spatially varying modelling. In this short article, we propose an improved autoregressive model that preserves image sharpness around the edges of the image and focus on the reduction of Poisson noise, which degrades nuclear medicine images and presents a special challenge in medical imaging.

References

  1. Takalo R, Hytti H, Ihalainen H. Adaptive autoregressive model for reduction of poisson noise in scintigraphic images. J Nucl Med Technol. 2011; 39:19���26.
  2. Takalo R, Hytti H, Ihalainen H, Sohlberg A. Adaptive autoregressive model for reduction of noise in SPECT. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015; 2015:494691.
  3. Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Smith EO, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer PB. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys. 1994; 21:299���302.
  4. Butterworth S. On the theory of filter amplifiers. In: Experimental Wireless and the Wireless Engineer. Vol 7. London: Iliffe & Sons Limited; 1930. pp. 536���541.
  5. Gravel P, Beaudoin G, De Guise JA. A method for modeling noise in medical images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004; 23:1221���1232.
  6. Abbott P, Braun M. Segmentation of ultrasound image by two-dimensional autoregressive modelling. Del Bimbo A, editor. In: Image Analysis and Processing. ICIAP 1997. Vol 1311, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1997. pp. 672���679.
  7. Chen ZD, Chang RF, Kuo WJ. Adaptive predictive multiplicative autoregressive model for medical image compression. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18:181���184.
  8. Sasikala M, Kumaravel N. Optimal autoregressive model based medical image compression using genetic algorithm. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2000; 36:177���182.
  9. Lee S, Stathaki T. Texture characterization using autoregressive models with applications to medical imaging. Costradiou L, editor. In: Medical Image Analysis Methods. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Taylor & Francis Group; 2005. pp. 185���224.

MeSH Term

Poisson Distribution
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Regression Analysis
Humans

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0imageedgesautoregressivemodelmodelspredictionfilteredfeaturereductionPoissonnoiseAutoregressiveprocessinglinearsplitpredictedieerrorextractsdataEdgeseparationcrucialDatacanprocesseddifferentwaysaddedAnotherbasicmethodspatiallyvaryingmodellingshortarticleproposeimprovedpreservessharpnessaroundfocusdegradesnuclearmedicineimagespresentsspecialchallengemedicalimagingEdge-preservingadaptive

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.