OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for quantifying differences in geometric shapes of human lumbar vertebra using statistical shape modeling (SSM).
METHODS: A novel 3D implementation of a previously published 2D, nonlinear SSM was implemented and compared to a commonly used, Cartesian method of SSM. The nonlinear method, or Hybrid SSM, and Cartesian SSM were applied to lumbar vertebra shapes from a cohort of 18 full lumbar triangle meshes derived from CT scans. The comparison included traditional metrics for cumulative variance, generality, and specificity and results from application-based biomechanics using finite element simulation.
RESULTS: The Hybrid SSM has less compactness - likely due to the increased number of mathematical constraints in the SSM formulation. Similar results were found between methods for specificity and generality. Compared to the previously validated, manually-segmented FE model, both SSM methods produced similar and agreeable results.
CONCLUSION: Visual, statistical, and biomechanical findings did not convincingly support the superiority of the Hybrid SSM over the simpler Cartesian SSM.
SIGNIFICANCE: This work suggests that, of the two methods compared, the Cartesian SSM is adequate to capture the variations in shape of the posterior spinal structures for biomechanical modeling applications.
