Barriers and potential solutions to international collaboration in neuro-oncology clinical trials: Challenges from the Australian perspective.

Benjamin Y Kong, Candace Carter, Anna K Nowak, Elizabeth Hovey, Zarnie Lwin, Neda Haghighi, Hui K Gan, Hao-Wen Sim, David S Ziegler, Kirston Barton, Jonathon Parkinson, Robyn Leonard, Mustafa Khasraw, Matthew Foote
Author Information
  1. Benjamin Y Kong: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  2. Candace Carter: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  3. Anna K Nowak: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia. ORCID
  4. Elizabeth Hovey: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  5. Zarnie Lwin: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  6. Neda Haghighi: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  7. Hui K Gan: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  8. Hao-Wen Sim: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  9. David S Ziegler: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  10. Kirston Barton: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  11. Jonathon Parkinson: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  12. Robyn Leonard: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  13. Mustafa Khasraw: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.
  14. Matthew Foote: Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

AIM: The neuro-oncology community in Australia is well positioned to collaborate internationally, with a motivated trials group, strong regulatory bodies and an attractive fiscal environment. We sought to identify gaps in the Australian neuro-oncology clinical trials landscape and describe strategies to increase international trial access in Australia.
METHODS: We searched clinical trial registries to identify active adult primary brain cancer trials. We compared the participation rate and phase of these trials between tumour types and countries. A survey was distributed to the Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology membership to identify barriers and solutions to effective international collaboration.
RESULTS: Globally, 307 trials for adult primary brain cancers were identified. These included 50% pharmaceutical agents, 18% cellular therapies and 9% radiation therapy. Twelve adult primary brain cancer trials were actively recruiting in Australia at the time the survey was sent out. There were more early phase brain cancer trials (34%) compared with colorectal and breast cancer (21% and 24%, respectively). In Australia, 92% of brain cancer trials were involving pharmaceutical agents. The most commonly cited barrier was lack of funding for international trials (86%) and insufficient research time (75%). High ranking solutions included increasing the availability of funding for international trials and creating opportunities to develop personal relationships with collaborators. Accreditation of clinical research key performance indicators into practice (88%) and hospital accreditation (73%) also ranked highly.
CONCLUSIONS: Participation in international research in Australia could be improved by embedding clinical research targets into institutional funding, provision of funding for early phase studies and streamlining mutual ethics schemes.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Oncol. 2008 Jun;2(1):20-32 [PMID: 19383326]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 7;374(14):1344-55 [PMID: 27050206]
  3. Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1645-1653 [PMID: 28801186]
  4. Intern Med J. 2017 Apr;47(4):394-399 [PMID: 28401723]
  5. Intern Med J. 2016 May;46(5):550-8 [PMID: 26909676]
  6. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Feb 1;35(3):478-485 [PMID: 28728503]
  7. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun;18(3):259-266 [PMID: 34166569]
  8. Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):300-6 [PMID: 25274616]
  9. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20 [PMID: 27157931]
  10. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan 10;20(1):113-122 [PMID: 29016865]
  11. Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77 [PMID: 24120142]
  12. Eval Health Prof. 2016 Mar;39(1):3-20 [PMID: 24686746]
  13. Lancet. 2006 May 20;367(9523):1698-701 [PMID: 16714192]

MeSH Term

Adult
Australia
Brain Neoplasms
Humans
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Surveys and Questionnaires

Chemicals

Pharmaceutical Preparations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trialsinternationalclinicalAustraliabraincancerfundingneuro-oncologyresearchidentifyadultprimaryphasesolutionsAustraliantrialcomparedsurveycollaborationincludedpharmaceuticalagentstimeearlyethicsAIM:communitywellpositionedcollaborateinternationallymotivatedgroupstrongregulatorybodiesattractivefiscalenvironmentsoughtgapslandscapedescribestrategiesincreaseaccessMETHODS:searchedregistriesactiveparticipationratetumourtypescountriesdistributedCooperativeTrialsGroupNeuro-OncologymembershipbarrierseffectiveRESULTS:Globally307cancersidentified50%18%cellulartherapies9%radiationtherapyTwelveactivelyrecruitingsent34%colorectalbreast21%24%respectively92%involvingcommonlycitedbarrierlack86%insufficient75%HighrankingincreasingavailabilitycreatingopportunitiesdeveloppersonalrelationshipscollaboratorsAccreditationkeyperformanceindicatorspractice88%hospitalaccreditation73%alsorankedhighlyCONCLUSIONS:ParticipationimprovedembeddingtargetsinstitutionalprovisionstudiesstreamliningmutualschemesBarrierspotentialtrials:Challengesperspectivecooperation

Similar Articles

Cited By