OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
The British journal of social psychology
Jan, 2022;61 (1): 300-321.

Communicating group norms through election results.

Lily Syfers, Amber M Gaffney, David E Rast, Dennis A Estrada
Author Information
  1. Lily Syfers: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ORCID
  2. Amber M Gaffney: Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, USA.
  3. David E Rast: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Dennis A Estrada: Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, USA.
PMID: 34258766 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12481

Abstract

In a representative democracy, leaders (ideally) who are elected through the electorates should indicate consensus that the newly elected leader truly does represent the majority of the nation or the group. That is, once elected, can the ensuing perceptions of the electorate's consensus provide the newly elected leader with a sense of legitimacy and the ability to represent the group? Two experiments demonstrate that the perceptions of group consensus stemming from democratic elections can imbue newly elected leaders (even if they were once deviant) with legitimacy. Study 1 (N = 158) demonstrates that normative leaders are perceived as more legitimate than deviant leaders when elected with high voting consensus, which increased the perceived prototypicality of the normative leader through greater perceptions of legitimacy. Study 2 (N = 182) showed that newly elected leaders (vs. candidates) are perceived as more legitimate, which in turn, increases the group's perceptions of the once deviant leader's prototypicality, granted that the leader is democratically elected. Results suggest that democratic elections create conditions under which once deviant leaders can gain in perceived prototypicality and create lasting changes to the group identity.

Keywords

deviance group consensus leadership prototypicality

References

  1. Aberson, C. (2019). pwr2ppl: Power analyses for common designs (power to the people). R package version 0.1.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr2ppl
  2. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Brown, N. J., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430202005002922
  3. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Brown, N. J., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906
  4. Abrams, D., Randsley, D. M., Marques, J. M., & Hutchinson, P. (2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662-678. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.134
  5. Abrams, D., Travaglino, G. A., Marques, J. M., Pinto, I., & Levine, J. M. (2018). Deviance credit: Tolerance of deviant ingroup leaders is mediated by heir accrual of prototypicality and conferral of their right to be supported. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12255
  6. Barreto, N. B., & Hogg, M. A. (2017). Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: A meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research. Social Influence, 12(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2017.1316771
  7. Ben-Yoav, O., Hollander, E. P., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1983). Leader legitimacy, leader-follower interaction, and followers’ ratings of the leader. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121(1), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9924472
  8. Bowles, H. (2020, November 13). Playtime with Harry Styles. Vogue. Retrieved from https://www.vogue.com/article/harry-styles-cover-december-2020
  9. Brandts, J., Cooper, D. J., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Legitimacy, communication, and leadership in the turnaround game. Management Science, 61, 2627-2645. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2021
  10. Crano, W. B., & Gaffney, A. M. (2021). Social psychological contributions to the study of populism. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano, & K. Fielder (Eds.), The psychology of populism: The tribal challenge to liberal democracy (pp. 297-318). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003057680
  11. Drohan, F. (2020, November 30). The Harry Styles Vogue cover is so popular, there’s now a waitlist. The Daily Front Row. Retrieved from https://fashionweekdaily.com/harry-styles-december-vogue-cover/
  12. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  13. Gaffney, A. M., Rast, III, D. E., & Hogg, M. A. (2018). Uncertainty and influence: The advantages (and disadvantages) of being atypical. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12254
  14. Gaffney, A. M., Sherburne, B., Hackett, J. D., Rast, III, D. E., & Hohman, Z. P. (2019). The transformative and informative nature of elections: Representation, schism, and exit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12279
  15. Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership. effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002
  16. Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2009). License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 434-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012
  17. Hahl, O., Kim, M., & Zuckerman Sivan, E. W. (2018). The authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: Proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. American Sociological Review, 83(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417749632
  18. Harris, B., & Schipani, A. (2020, May 18). Jair Bolsonaro’s radical supporters: ‘He only has us, the people’. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/005dd722-b27d-4337-99ec-3b9a52a87f6d
  19. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  20. Hayes, A. F. (2020). PROCESS for R version 3.5.3 beta0.6. Retrieved from https://www.processmacro.org
  21. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
  22. Hogg, M. A. (2010). Influence and leadership. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1166-1207). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119
  23. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
  24. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x
  25. Hollander, E. P. (1992). Leadership, followership, self, and others. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(92)90005-Z
  26. Huber, E. (2019, December 11). Billie Eilish is the most googled style icon of 2019 - Here’s why. Refinery29. Retrieved from https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2019/12/9005161/billie-eilish-clothes-style-google-search-fashion-2019
  27. Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. H. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461-485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151
  28. Lidgett, A. (January 16, 2016). Former Philadelphia police officer Ray Lewis, arrested during Occupy protests, set to appear at Cleveland Tamir Rice rally. International Business Times. Retrieved from https://www.ibtimes.com/former-philadelphia-police-officer-ray-lewis-arrested-during-occupy-protests-set-2252914
  29. Leibovich, M. (2019, February 25). How Lindsey Graham went from Trump skeptic to Trump sidekick. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/25/magazine/lindsey-graham-what-happened-trump.html
  30. Marques, J., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and ingroup norms in judgements of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976
  31. Moon, C., Morais, C., Randsley de Moura, G., & Uskul, A. K. (2020). The role of organizational structure and deviant status in employees’ reactions to and acceptance of workplace deviance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32, 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-03-2020-0036
  32. Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2007). Playing the game: When group success is more important than downgrading deviants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.385
  33. Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018187
  34. Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
  35. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
  36. Read, P. B. (1974). Source of authority and the legitimation of leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 37(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786375
  37. Reicher, S., Haslam, A. S., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
  38. Scheepers, D., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 611-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00506-1
  39. Seyranian, V. (2014). Social identity framing communication strategies for mobilizing social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 468-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.013
  40. Sutton, K. (2017, April 19). Lindsay Graham heaps praise on Trump: ‘I am all in.’ Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/lindsey-graham-praises-trump-237361
  41. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
  42. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  44. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
  45. van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.003
  46. Van Knippenberg, B., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25
  47. van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1
  48. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Bobbio, A. (2008). Leaders as agents of continuity: Self continuity and resistance to collective change. In Self continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 175-186). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

MeSH Term

Humans
Leadership
Politics
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0electedleadersconsensusgroupnewlyleaderperceptionsdeviantperceivedprototypicalitycanlegitimacyrepresentdemocraticelectionsStudynormativelegitimatecreaterepresentativedemocracyideallyelectoratesindicatetrulymajoritynationensuingelectorate'sprovidesenseabilitygroup?Twoexperimentsdemonstratestemmingimbueeven1N = 158demonstrateshighvotingincreasedgreater2N = 182showedvscandidatesturnincreasesgroup'sleader'sgranteddemocraticallyResultssuggestconditionsgainlastingchangesidentityCommunicatingnormselectionresultsdevianceleadership

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.