When politeness processing encounters failed syntactic/semantic processing.

Liyan Ji
Author Information
  1. Liyan Ji: School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100048, China; School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China. Electronic address: jiliyan0717@126.com.

Abstract

Previous studies have elucidated the neural mechanism of syntactic/semantic processing and pragmatic processing. However, the exact mechanisms by which these two aspects of processing interact during language comprehension remain unknown. In this event-related brain potential study, we examined the interaction between politeness processing and local syntactic/semantic processing of a phrase. We used a full factorial design that crossed politeness consistency with local syntactic/semantic coherence. Politeness violations elicited a P200 effect in the 190-320 ms range, centro-parietally distributed positivity in the 360-866 ms range, and pure local syntactic/semantic violation elicited a broad distributed positivity in the 362-868 ms range. Crucially, we found that event-related potential responses elicited by combined politeness and syntactic/semantic violations resemble those elicited by separate syntactic/semantic violations. These results indicated that local syntactic/semantic processing has a functional primacy over politeness processing. Furthermore, our results support the blocking hypothesis from a politeness processing perspective instead of the independent hypothesis.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Brain
Comprehension
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials
Humans
Semantics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0processingsyntactic/semanticpolitenesslocalelicitedviolationsrangeevent-relatedpotentialPolitenessdistributedpositivityresultshypothesisPreviousstudieselucidatedneuralmechanismpragmaticHoweverexactmechanismstwoaspectsinteractlanguagecomprehensionremainunknownbrainstudyexaminedinteractionphraseusedfullfactorialdesigncrossedconsistencycoherenceP200effect190-320 mscentro-parietally360-866 mspureviolationbroad362-868 msCruciallyfoundresponsescombinedresembleseparateindicatedfunctionalprimacyFurthermoresupportblockingperspectiveinsteadindependentencountersfailedEvent-relatedpotentialsERPsP600SemanticSyntactic

Similar Articles

Cited By