Exploring customers' responses to online service failure and recovery strategies during Covid-19 pandemic: An actor-network theory perspective.

Wilson Ozuem, Silvia Ranfagni, Michelle Willis, Serena Rovai, Kerry Howell
Author Information
  1. Wilson Ozuem: Institute of Business, Industry and Leadership University of Cumbria Carlisle UK. ORCID
  2. Silvia Ranfagni: Department of Economics and Management University of Florence Florence Italy. ORCID
  3. Michelle Willis: Institute of Business, Industry and Leadership University of Cumbria Carlisle UK.
  4. Serena Rovai: Excelia Business School Excelia Group La Rochelle France.
  5. Kerry Howell: Deputy Pro Vice-Chancellor Northumbria University Newcastle UK.

Abstract

While the debate on online service failure and recovery strategies has been given considerable attention in the marketing and information systems literature, the evolving Covid-19 pandemic has brought about new challenges both theoretically and empirically in the consumption landscape. To fully understand customers' responses to service failure during a crisis we asked 70 millennials from three European Countries-Italy, France, and the UK-to describe their responses to service failure during the Covid-19 pandemic (30 completed a 4-week diary and 40 completed a 4-week qualitative survey). Drawing on phenomenological, constructivist, and hermeneutical approaches, and utilizing an actor-network theory perspective, the current study proposes a new framework for understanding customers' responses to online service failure and recovery strategies during the Covid-19 pandemic. Conclusions highlight implications for theory, policy, and management practice through extending comprehensions of service failure recovery processes by examining how marketing policies generate different social impacts during a crisis situation which facilitate the achievement of customer satisfaction and positive outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:312-321 [PMID: 32546875]
  2. J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Aug;74:102248 [PMID: 32505918]
  3. Health Psychol. 2020 May;39(5):355-357 [PMID: 32202824]
  4. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113098 [PMID: 32434092]
  5. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 21;5(4):679-681 [PMID: 32363242]
  6. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:199-208 [PMID: 32501306]
  7. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:214-220 [PMID: 32501308]
  8. Comput Human Behav. 2020 Oct;111:106424 [PMID: 32398890]
  9. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Feb;163:120469 [PMID: 35721368]
  10. J Bus Res. 2021 Jul;131:763-781 [PMID: 33052152]
  11. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2020 Apr;136:101922 [PMID: 32288597]
  12. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Feb;163:120447 [PMID: 33518818]
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83 [PMID: 2926629]
  14. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:33-54 [PMID: 17222081]
  15. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Dec;88(6):1019-33 [PMID: 14640813]
  16. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Nov 01;10:67 [PMID: 21040575]
  17. Nurs Inq. 2016 Jun;23(2):109-20 [PMID: 26531190]
  18. J Consum Behav. 2021 Jan-Feb;20(1):48-60 [PMID: 38607848]
  19. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:280-283 [PMID: 32536735]
  20. J Bus Res. 2021 Aug;132:586-593 [PMID: 34744212]
  21. J Bus Res. 2021 Feb;123:165-175 [PMID: 33041396]
  22. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:124-131 [PMID: 32834208]
  23. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:176-182 [PMID: 32457556]
  24. Risk Anal. 2006 Apr;26(2):347-51 [PMID: 16573625]
  25. Stress Health. 2020 Oct;36(4):555-559 [PMID: 32762116]
  26. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:209-213 [PMID: 32501307]
  27. Bus Horiz. 2020 Nov-Dec;63(6):705-723 [PMID: 32398883]
  28. Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Oct;54:102173 [PMID: 32834338]
  29. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:284-289 [PMID: 32536736]
  30. Gend Work Organ. 2020 Sep;27(5):788-803 [PMID: 32837010]
  31. Psychol Mark. 2021 Sep;38(9):1440-1459 [PMID: 34539054]
  32. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579-616 [PMID: 12499517]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0servicefailurerecoveryCovid-19pandemicresponsesonlinestrategiescustomers'crisistheoryperspectivemarketingnewmillennialscompleted4-weekconstructivistactor-networkdebategivenconsiderableattentioninformationsystemsliteratureevolvingbroughtchallengestheoreticallyempiricallyconsumptionlandscapefullyunderstandasked70threeEuropeanCountries-ItalyFranceUK-todescribe30diary40qualitativesurveyDrawingphenomenologicalhermeneuticalapproachesutilizingcurrentstudyproposesframeworkunderstandingConclusionshighlightimplicationspolicymanagementpracticeextendingcomprehensionsprocessesexaminingpoliciesgeneratedifferentsocialimpactssituationfacilitateachievementcustomersatisfactionpositiveoutcomesExploringpandemic:Covid���19strategy

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)