Assessment of One Health Knowledge, Animal Welfare Implications, and Emergency Preparedness Considerations for Effective Public Health Response.

Linda C Pimentel, Alicia C May, John K Iskander, Ronald E Banks, John D Gibbins
Author Information
  1. Linda C Pimentel: 1242 Office of Laboratory Science and Safety, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. ORCID
  2. Alicia C May: 1355 Current address: College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
  3. John K Iskander: 17233 Current address: US Coast Guard, US Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, USA. ORCID
  4. Ronald E Banks: 6186 The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  5. John D Gibbins: 2510 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Information on knowledge of public health professionals about health aspects of the human-animal interface, referred to as One Health, is limited. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with animal welfare attitudes, practices, and One Health awareness among US Public Health Service (USPHS) officers to assess preparedness for public health response.
METHODS: USPHS officers participated in an online, self-administered survey from February 15 through March 2, 2018. A total of 1133 of 6474 (17.5%) USPHS officers responded. We collected information on officers' demographic characteristics, animal welfare attitudes and practices, volunteer and work exposure to animals, and One Health knowledge. We compared (1) One Health knowledge and animal work exposure (deployment, regular assignment, or none) and (2) animal welfare importance and animal work exposure. To adjust for demographic characteristics associated with One Health knowledge, we used multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: One-third of nonveterinary officers reported encountering animals during deployment, and 65% reported that animal welfare was very or extremely important. We found no difference in One Health knowledge between nonveterinary officers who participated in deployments involving animals and nonveterinary officers who had no work exposure to animals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71-1.75). Nonveterinary officers who participated in animal-related public health activities during regular assignment were more likely to have One Health knowledge than nonveterinary officers who had no work exposure to animals (aOR = 7.88; 95% CI, 5.36-11.59).
CONCLUSIONS: One Health knowledge and awareness should be further explored in the current US public health workforce to identify training needs for emergency preparedness and other collaborative opportunities.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Health Nurs. 2016 Sep;33(5):472-80 [PMID: 27302852]
  2. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 29;6:33703 [PMID: 27906121]
  3. Vet Rec. 2016 Oct 22;179(16):412-413 [PMID: 27770094]
  4. Acta Vet Scand. 2008;50 Suppl 1:S1-12 [PMID: 19049678]
  5. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2020 Apr;9(1):50-51 [PMID: 32341222]
  6. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;20(4):324-343 [PMID: 28494169]
  7. Vet J. 2012 Apr;192(1):13-9 [PMID: 21703888]
  8. Public Health Nurs. 2019 Jul;36(4):507-513 [PMID: 31099919]
  9. J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Spring;36(1):122-7 [PMID: 19435999]
  10. Ecohealth. 2020 Jun;17(2):222-232 [PMID: 32685999]
  11. One Health. 2016 Nov 16;3:5-10 [PMID: 28616496]
  12. PLoS Pathog. 2016 Sep 15;12(9):e1005731 [PMID: 27631500]
  13. Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 09;10(4): [PMID: 32283812]
  14. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018 May 03;44(5):116-121 [PMID: 31007622]

MeSH Term

Animal Welfare
Animals
Civil Defense
Health Personnel
Humans
One Health
Public Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HealthOnehealthofficersknowledgepublicanimalworkexposureanimalswelfarenonveterinaryUSPHSpreparednessparticipatedidentifyassociatedattitudespracticesawarenessUSPublic2demographiccharacteristics1deploymentregularassignmentreported=95%CItrainingemergencyOBJECTIVES:Informationprofessionalsaspectshuman-animalinterfacereferredlimitedobjectivestudyfactorsamongServiceassessresponseMETHODS:onlineself-administeredsurveyFebruary15March2018total11336474175%respondedcollectedinformationofficers'volunteercomparednoneimportanceadjustusedmultivariablelogisticregressionRESULTS:One-thirdencountering65%extremelyimportantfounddifferencedeploymentsinvolvingadjustedoddsratio[aOR]11071-175Nonveterinaryanimal-relatedactivitieslikelyaOR788536-1159CONCLUSIONS:exploredcurrentworkforceneedscollaborativeopportunitiesAssessmentKnowledgeAnimalWelfareImplicationsEmergencyPreparednessConsiderationsEffectiveResponsementalwell-beingpracticeveterinary

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)