Adaptive body awareness predicts fewer central sensitization-related symptoms and explains relationship between central sensitization-related symptoms and pain intensity: A cross-sectional study among individuals with chronic pain.

Dana Dharmakaya Colgan, Ashley Eddy, Kaylie Green, Barry Oken
Author Information
  1. Dana Dharmakaya Colgan: Neurology Department, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. ORCID
  2. Ashley Eddy: School of Graduate Psychology, Pacific University, Forest Grove, Oregon, USA. ORCID
  3. Kaylie Green: School of Graduate Psychology, Pacific University, Forest Grove, Oregon, USA.
  4. Barry Oken: Neurology Department, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central Sensitization (CS), defined as the amplification of neural signaling within the CNS that elicits pain hypersensitivity, is thought be a characteristic of several chronic pain conditions. Maladaptive body awareness is thought to contribute and maintain CS. Less is known about the relationship between CS and adaptive body awareness.
PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study investigated relationships among self-reported adaptive body awareness (Multidimensional Interoceptive Awareness Scale-2; MAIA-2), CS-related symptoms (Central Sensitization Inventory; CSI), and pain intensity and further delineate potential direct and indirect links among these constructs.
METHODS: Online surveys were administered to 280 individuals with chronic pain reporting elevated CSI scores. Strategic sampling targeted respondents to reflect the 2010 census. Pearson's correlations characterized overall relationship between variables. Multiple regression analyses investigated potential direct links. A path analysis assessed mediational effects of CS-related symptoms on the relationship between adaptive body awareness and pain intensity.
RESULTS: CSI demonstrated strong, inverse correlations with some MAIA-2 subscales, but positive correlations with others. Higher CSI scores predicted greater pain intensity (b = 0.049, p ≤ 0.001). Two MAIA-2 subscales, Not-Distracting (b = -0.56, p ≤ 0.001) and Not-Worrying (b = -1.17, p ≤ 0.001) were unique predictors of lower CSI. Not-Distracting (b = -0.05, p = 0.003) and Not-Worrying (b = -0.06, p = 0.007) uniquely predicted lower pain intensity. CSI completely mediated the relationship between adaptive body awareness and pain intensity [point estimate = -0.04; 95% bootstrap confident intervals (CI) = -0.05 to -0.02].
CONCLUSIONS: Findings also support future research to explore causal relationships of variables. Findings suggest that frequency of attention to bodily sensations is distinct from cognitive-affective appraisal of bodily sensation, and the two distinct higher order processes may have divergent influences on perceived pain and CS-related symptoms. Results also support future research to explore causal relationships of variables.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pain. 2016 Oct;17(10):1068-1080 [PMID: 27377620]
  2. Psychosom Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;63(5):697-710 [PMID: 11573016]
  3. Behav Res Ther. 1997 Oct;35(10):901-10 [PMID: 9401131]
  4. J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 23;9(4): [PMID: 32340369]
  5. Pain. 2006 Aug;123(3):231-243 [PMID: 16697110]
  6. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):463-84 [PMID: 15979027]
  7. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2011 Apr 07;6:6 [PMID: 21473781]
  8. Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3401-3412 [PMID: 32935129]
  9. Pain. 1997 Aug;72(1-2):209-15 [PMID: 9272805]
  10. J Pain. 2012 Aug;13(8):715-24 [PMID: 22607834]
  11. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034 [PMID: 30513087]
  12. Funct Neurol. 2000;15 Suppl 3:28-35 [PMID: 11200798]
  13. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91 [PMID: 18697684]
  14. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48230 [PMID: 23133619]
  15. Pain Pract. 2015 Jul;15(6):E46-53 [PMID: 25980527]
  16. Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2732-40 [PMID: 23696275]
  17. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-22 [PMID: 18985137]
  18. Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 09;6:763 [PMID: 26106345]
  19. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun;37(6):339-52 [PMID: 18191990]
  20. J Psychosom Res. 2019 Feb;117:32-40 [PMID: 30665594]
  21. Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):968-71 [PMID: 9252330]
  22. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):501-513 [PMID: 29884281]
  23. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019 Jun 24;34(1):83–91 [PMID: 31247058]
  24. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):229-37 [PMID: 26092329]
  25. Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:798 [PMID: 29892247]
  26. Pain Pract. 2012 Apr;12(4):276-85 [PMID: 21951710]
  27. J Behav Med. 2015 Dec;38(6):876-85 [PMID: 26341355]
  28. J Behav Med. 2014 Jun;37(3):564-75 [PMID: 23633239]
  29. Man Ther. 2012 Apr;17(2):119-25 [PMID: 22074733]
  30. Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):451-63 [PMID: 20490545]
  31. Mol Cells. 2007 Jun 30;23(3):259-71 [PMID: 17646700]
  32. Eur J Pain. 2019 Oct;23(9):1640-1648 [PMID: 31233655]
  33. Pain. 2019 Apr;160(4):833-843 [PMID: 30531308]
  34. Pain Pract. 2019 Feb;19(2):183-195 [PMID: 30269431]
  35. Pain Pract. 2018 Feb;18(2):239-246 [PMID: 28449376]
  36. Clin J Pain. 2019 Nov;35(11):869-879 [PMID: 31408011]
  37. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Jun;21(3):481-97 [PMID: 17602995]
  38. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 15;40(15):4381-4396 [PMID: 31298464]
  39. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14(7):502-11 [PMID: 23719569]
  40. Pain Med. 2018 Oct 1;19(10):2009-2015 [PMID: 29522121]
  41. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Feb;20(1):1-2 [PMID: 30782390]
  42. World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:594-600 [PMID: 28479522]
  43. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):500-5 [PMID: 12965300]
  44. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31 [PMID: 15641418]
  45. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 16;140(6):441-51 [PMID: 15023710]
  46. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Aug;44(1):68-75 [PMID: 24508406]
  47. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708): [PMID: 28080968]
  48. J Pain. 2016 Oct;17(10):1058-1067 [PMID: 27369186]
  49. Addiction. 2016 Apr;111(4):615-25 [PMID: 26567088]
  50. Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):544-554 [PMID: 28851012]
  51. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):7710-3 [PMID: 10393885]
  52. Pain. 2007 May;129(1-2):130-42 [PMID: 17156923]
  53. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;186(1):79-85 [PMID: 18030455]
  54. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5614 [PMID: 19440300]
  55. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70 [PMID: 19096369]
  56. Behav Res Ther. 2004 Sep;42(9):1037-52 [PMID: 15325900]
  57. Pain. 2009 Feb;141(3):183-184 [PMID: 19150750]
  58. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S2-S15 [PMID: 20961685]
  59. Pain. 2002 Feb;95(3):195-199 [PMID: 11839418]
  60. Nature. 2001 Mar 22;410(6827):471-5 [PMID: 11260714]
  61. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Jan;8(1):15-26 [PMID: 22689216]
  62. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Jun 29;520(2):165-73 [PMID: 22487846]
  63. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2018 Jun;23(2): [PMID: 30479469]
  64. J Pain. 2013 Jul;14(7):663-75 [PMID: 23685185]
  65. Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:967 [PMID: 27445929]
  66. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66 [PMID: 12154366]
  67. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Nov;65(5):417-24 [PMID: 18940371]
  68. Pain. 2011 Jan;152(1):150-156 [PMID: 21055874]
  69. Subst Abus. 2019;40(1):102-115 [PMID: 29949455]
  70. Pain. 2008 Oct 15;139(2):439-448 [PMID: 18617327]
  71. Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e784 [PMID: 33521482]
  72. J Pain. 2013 May;14(5):438-45 [PMID: 23490634]
  73. Neuron. 2015 Aug 5;87(3):474-91 [PMID: 26247858]
  74. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Feb;41(2):92-101 [PMID: 29329739]
  75. J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 01;10:2109-2122 [PMID: 28979158]

Grants

  1. T32 AT002688/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Central Nervous System Sensitization
Chronic Pain
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Pain Measurement
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painawarenessbodyCSIrelationshipsymptomsintensitychronicadaptiveCSrelationshipsamongCS-relatedcorrelationsvariablesp ≤ 0001b = -0centralCentralsensitizationthoughtcross-sectionalstudyinvestigatedpotentialdirectlinksindividualsscoresMAIA-2 subscalespredictedNot-DistractingNot-Worryingpredictorslower05p = 0Findingsalsosupportfutureresearchexplorecausalbodilydistinctsensitization-relatedBACKGROUND:definedamplificationneuralsignalingwithinCNSelicitshypersensitivitycharacteristicseveralconditionsMaladaptivecontributemaintainLessknownPURPOSE:self-reportedMultidimensionalInteroceptiveAwarenessScale-2MAIA-2SensitizationInventorydelineateindirectconstructsMETHODS:Onlinesurveysadministered280reportingelevatedStrategicsamplingtargetedrespondentsreflect2010censusPearson'scharacterizedoverallMultipleregressionanalysespathanalysisassessedmediationaleffectsRESULTS:demonstratedstronginversepositiveothersHighergreaterb = 0049Two56b = -117unique00306007uniquelycompletelymediated[pointestimate = -00495%bootstrapconfidentintervalsCI = -0-002]CONCLUSIONS:suggestfrequencyattentionsensationscognitive-affectiveappraisalsensationtwohigherorderprocessesmaydivergentinfluencesperceivedResultsAdaptivepredictsfewerexplainsintensity:interoceptivemediation

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)