Environmental Regulation, Government Subsidies, and Green Technology Innovation-A Provincial Panel Data Analysis from China.

Pei Wang, Cong Dong, Nan Chen, Ming Qi, Shucheng Yang, Amuji Bridget Nnenna, Wenxin Li
Author Information
  1. Pei Wang: School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China.
  2. Cong Dong: School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China. ORCID
  3. Nan Chen: School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China.
  4. Ming Qi: School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China.
  5. Shucheng Yang: School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China.
  6. Amuji Bridget Nnenna: School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China.
  7. Wenxin Li: School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China.

Abstract

Economic development in the "new era" will require green innovation. To encourage the growth of green technology innovation, it has become fashionable to strengthen environmental regulation. However, the impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation, as well as the role of government subsidies, needs to be examined. Utilizing fixed-effect models and 2SLS models to explore the impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation in China from 2003 to 2017, this research sought to examine whether environmental regulations impact green technology innovation, as well as the role of government subsidies in the above-mentioned influence path. The findings support the Porter Hypothesis by demonstrating an inverted "U" relationship between environmental regulation and green technology innovation. The impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation varies by region. To be specific, there is an inverted "U" relationship between environmental regulation and green technology innovation in China's central and central coast regions. In comparison, the north area, southern coast, and southwest region exhibit a "U" relationship between the two. The relationship is not significant in the Beijing-Tianjin region. Additionally, government subsidies act as an intermediate in this process, positively influencing firms to pursue green technology innovation during the earliest stages of environmental regulation strengthening. However, government subsidies above a certain level are unproductive and should be used appropriately and phased off in due course.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 23;8(1):1712 [PMID: 29167467]
  2. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 25;732:139200 [PMID: 32438170]

MeSH Term

China
Conservation of Natural Resources
Data Analysis
Economic Development
Financing, Government
Government Regulation
Inventions

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0greeninnovationtechnologyenvironmentalregulationgovernmentsubsidiesimpactrelationshipChina"U"regionHoweverwellrolemodelsinvertedcentralcoastEconomicdevelopment"newera"willrequireencouragegrowthbecomefashionablestrengthenneedsexaminedUtilizingfixed-effect2SLSexplore20032017researchsoughtexaminewhetherregulationsabove-mentionedinfluencepathfindingssupportPorterHypothesisdemonstratingvariesspecificChina'sregionscomparisonnorthareasouthernsouthwestexhibittwosignificantBeijing-TianjinAdditionallyactintermediateprocesspositivelyinfluencingfirmspursueearlieststagesstrengtheningcertainlevelunproductiveusedappropriatelyphasedduecourseEnvironmentalRegulationGovernmentSubsidiesGreenTechnologyInnovation-AProvincialPanelDataAnalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (14)