Gender inclusivity through maize breeding in Africa: A review of the issues and options for future engagement.

Rachel C Voss, Jason Donovan, Pieter Rutsaert, Jill E Cairns
Author Information
  1. Rachel C Voss: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya. ORCID
  2. Jason Donovan: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico. ORCID
  3. Pieter Rutsaert: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya. ORCID
  4. Jill E Cairns: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Harare, MP, Zimbabwe. ORCID

Abstract

With the prioritization of social inclusion in agricultural development, donors and research centers have shown growing interest in gender-intentional varietal development and delivery. Breeding maize varieties that respond to gender-based differences in trait preferences now represents a central objective of maize R&D in the CGIAR and elsewhere. Drawing on literature on gender and maize seed adoption, variety preferences, and seed system constraints, we take stock of knowns and unknowns related to gender-responsive and gender-intentional maize breeding. While recent research on farmers' variety preferences across crops has yielded insights into gender-based differences, we find that evidence of gender-differentiated preferences for maize varieties remains inconclusive. Ultimately, we identify several research priorities to support gender-intentional maize breeding, including a more nuanced understanding of gender relations in maize production and maize seed decision-making, new and more gender-responsive approaches to measuring farmer preferences and seed demand more broadly, and research to address operational challenges in gender-intentional breeding. We close by identifying some institutional constraints to achieving impact through gender-intentional maize breeding.

Keywords

References

  1. Outlook Agric. 2020 Mar;49(1):39-49 [PMID: 32641870]
  2. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;56(3):1258-1277 [PMID: 33776234]
  3. Field Crops Res. 2020 Feb 1;246:107693 [PMID: 32015590]
  4. World Dev Perspect. 2020 Dec;20:100268 [PMID: 33392420]
  5. Agric Econ. 2020 Jan;51(1):47-58 [PMID: 32322130]
  6. Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Mar;132(3):627-645 [PMID: 30824972]
  7. J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Dec;94(15):3201-12 [PMID: 24659349]
  8. Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Jun;134(6):1729-1752 [PMID: 33594449]
  9. Technol Soc. 2021 Aug;66:101630 [PMID: 34456397]
  10. World Dev. 2017 Feb;90:169-183 [PMID: 28163352]
  11. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;56(3):1076-1092 [PMID: 33776222]
  12. World Dev. 2017 Jun;94:465-477 [PMID: 28579670]
  13. Glob Food Sec. 2018 Mar;16:69-74 [PMID: 29552461]
  14. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2019 Sep-Oct;76:102264 [PMID: 31853161]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4194-4199 [PMID: 30782795]
  16. J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jun;98(6):4148-61 [PMID: 25864048]
  17. Animal. 2012 May;6(5):778-88 [PMID: 22558925]
  18. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;56(3):1223-1238 [PMID: 33776232]
  19. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;56(3):1115-1123 [PMID: 33776224]
  20. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 31;10(1):14286 [PMID: 32868856]
  21. Heliyon. 2021 Mar 12;7(3):e06389 [PMID: 33748470]
  22. Outlook Agric. 2021 Mar;50(1):5-12 [PMID: 33867584]
  23. Commun Biol. 2021 Aug 19;4(1):944 [PMID: 34413464]
  24. Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):758-62 [PMID: 12730592]
  25. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Oct;45(Pt B):226-230 [PMID: 29779966]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0maizepreferencesbreedinggender-intentionalresearchseeddevelopmentvarietiesgender-baseddifferencesgendervarietyconstraintsgender-responsivefarmerGenderprioritizationsocialinclusionagriculturaldonorscentersshowngrowinginterestvarietaldeliveryBreedingrespondtraitnowrepresentscentralobjectiveR&DCGIARelsewhereDrawingliteratureadoptionsystemtakestockknownsunknownsrelatedrecentfarmers'acrosscropsyieldedinsightsfindevidencegender-differentiatedremainsinconclusiveUltimatelyidentifyseveralprioritiessupportincludingnuancedunderstandingrelationsproductiondecision-makingnewapproachesmeasuringdemandbroadlyaddressoperationalchallengescloseidentifyinginstitutionalachievingimpactinclusivityAfrica:reviewissuesoptionsfutureengagementAfricacropimprovedseeds

Similar Articles

Cited By