Complications After Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair Based on Surgeon Specialty in the United States: Analysis of a National Database.
Anna Romanova, Yara Sifri, Bertille Gaigbe-Togbe, Kimia Menhaji, Ann Tran, Anne Hardart, Lisa Dabney
Author Information
Anna Romanova: From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
Yara Sifri: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.
Bertille Gaigbe-Togbe: From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
Kimia Menhaji: From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
Ann Tran: From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
Anne Hardart: From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
Lisa Dabney: From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the rates of major and minor complications for vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair based on surgeon specialty and to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between the years 2014 and 2019. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for VVF repair. Minor and major complication rates for VVF repair were compared between 2 cohorts defined by surgeon specialty: gynecology versus urology. Additional outcomes included readmissions and reoperations. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for complications. RESULTS: A total of 319 VVF repairs were included in the analysis, of which 115 (36.1%) were performed by gynecologists and 204 (63.9%) by urologists. There were no significant differences in the demographic or medical characteristics between the gynecology and urology cohorts except for race. Gynecologists performed more concomitant hysterectomies (10.4% vs 1.0%, P < 0.001) and apical suspension procedures (6.1% vs 0%, P < 0.001). There were no differences in minor (7.8% vs 6.4%, P = 0.623) or major (2.6% vs 3.4%, P = 1.000) complications between the cohorts. The overall readmission rate was 4.7%, and the reoperation rate was 2.2% with no differences between specialties. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, body mass index and concurrent hysterectomy were risk factors for major or minor complications with no increased risk associated with surgeon specialty or route of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates did not differ for VVF repairs performed by gynecologists compared with urologists. Readmission and reoperation rates were low for both groups.
References
Goh JT, Krause H, Tessema AB, et al. Urinary symptoms and urodynamics following obstetric genitourinary fistula repair. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:947–951. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1948-z.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1948-z]
Goh JT, Sloane KM, Krause HG, et al. Mental health screening in women with genital tract fistulae. BJOG 2005;112:1328–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00712.x.
[DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00712.x]
Hilton P. Urodynamic findings in patients with urogenital fistulae. Br J Urol 1998;81:539–542. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00596.x.
[DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00596.x]
Duong TH, Taylor DP, Meeks GR. A multicenter study of vesicovaginal fistula following incidental cystotomy during benign hysterectomies. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:975–979. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1375-6.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1375-6]
Oakley SH, Brown HW, Greer JA, et al. Management of vesicovaginal fistulae: a multicenter analysis from the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014;20:7–13. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000041.
[DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000041]
Hilton P. Urogenital fistula in the UK: a personal case series managed over 25 years. BJU Int 2012;110:102–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10630.x.
[DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10630.x]
Lo TS, Chua S, Wijaya T, et al. Clinical relevance and treatment outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2019;58:111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.021.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.021]
Lee RA, Symmonds RE, Williams TJ. Current status of genitourinary fistula. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:313–319.
Theofanides MC, Sui W, Sebesta EM, et al. Vesicovaginal fistulas in the developed world: an analysis of disease characteristics, treatments, and complications of surgical repair using the ACS-NSQIP database. Neurourol Urodyn 2017;36:1622–1628. doi: 10.1002/nau.23167.
[DOI: 10.1002/nau.23167]
Nardos R, Browning A, Chen CC. Risk factors that predict failure after vaginal repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:578.e1–578.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.008.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.008]
McKay E, Watts K, Abraham N. Abdominal approach to vesicovaginal fistula. Urol Clin North Am 2019;46:135–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.011.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.011]
Lee D, Zimmern P. Vaginal approach to vesicovaginal fistula. Urol Clin North Am 2019;46:123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.010.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.010]
Abdel-Karim AM, Mousa A, Hasouna M, et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal extravesical repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:693–697. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1334-7.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1334-7]
Shamout S, Anderson K, Baverstock R, et al. Evaluation of surgical approaches for vesicovaginal fistulae repair: the case for transvaginal repair as the gold standard. Int Urogynecol J 2021;32:2429–2435. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04869-w.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04869-w]
Stanford E, Romanzi L. Vesicovaginal fistula: what is the preferred closure technique?Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:383–385.
Rajamaheswari N, Bharti A, Seethalakshmi K. Vaginal repair of supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulae—a 10-year review. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:1675–1678. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1665-7.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1665-7]
Rajaian S, Pragatheeswarane M, Panda A. Vesicovaginal fistula: review and recent trends. Indian J Urol 2019;35:250–258. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_147_19.
[DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_147_19]
Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?Am J Surg 2009;198:S19–S27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.025.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.025]
American College of Surgeons. User Guide for the 2019 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). 2020. Available at: http://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip. Accessed September 21, 2021.
Hilton P, Cromwell DA. The risk of vesicovaginal and urethrovaginal fistula after hysterectomy performed in the English National Health Service—a retrospective cohort study examining patterns of care between 2000 and 2008. BJOG 2012;119:1447–1454. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03474.x.
[DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03474.x]
Warner R, Beardmore-Gray A, Pakzad M, et al. The cost effectiveness of vaginal versus abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistulae. Int Urogynecol J 2020;31:1363–1369. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04015-7.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04015-7]
Mellano EM, Tarnay CM. Management of genitourinary fistula. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014;26:415–423. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000095.
[DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000095]
Kieserman-Shmokler C, Sammarco AG, English EM, et al. The Latzko: a high-value, versatile vesicovaginal fistula repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:160.e1–160.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.021.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.021]
Ghosh B, Wats V, Pal DK. Comparative analysis of outcome between laparoscopic versus open surgical repair for vesico-vaginal fistula. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2016;59:525–529. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.6.525.
[DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.6.525]
Luo DY, Shen H. Transvaginal repair of apical vesicovaginal fistula: a modified Latzko technique—outcomes at a high-volume referral center. Eur Urol 2019;76:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.010.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.010]
Zhang Q, Ye Z, Liu F, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal transvesical repair of supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:337–342. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1850-8.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1850-8]
Miklos JR, Moore RD, Chinthakanan O. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted vesicovaginal fistula repair: a systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:727–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.001.
[DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.001]
Meneses AD, Oliveira AQ, de Araujo DA, et al. Transabdominal and transvesical laparoscopic correction of vesico-vaginal fistula: 42 cases experience. Int Braz J Urol 2020;46:296–297. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0743.
[DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0743]
Pietersma CS, Schreuder HW, Kooistra A, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula: a time-consuming novelty or an effective tool?BMJ Case Rep 2014;2014:bcr2014204119. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204119.
[DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204119]
American Urogynecologic Society. Archived Coding Questins. Available at: https://www.augs.org/clinical-practice/archived-coding-questions/. Accessed September 29, 2021.
Coding of Laparoscopic and Robotics Procedures. 2016. Available at: https://sufuorg.com/docs/coding/coding-corner-aug-2016.aspx. Accessed November 29, 2021.
Yan S, Walker R, Sultan AH. Open removal of a migrated Gellhorn pessary and repair of a vesicovaginal fistula. BMJ Case Rep 2020;13:e233986.
Roberts BL, Chang ES, Hidalgo RJ, et al. Vesicovaginal fistula repair at the time of colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J 2021;32:1939–1940. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04787-x.
[DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04787-x]
