Prevalence of Covid-19 personal protective equipment in aquatic systems and impact on associated fauna.

Iviwe Mvovo, Hezekiel B Magagula
Author Information
  1. Iviwe Mvovo: Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, King Williams Town Road, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700 South Africa. ORCID
  2. Hezekiel B Magagula: Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, King Williams Town Road, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700 South Africa.

Abstract

The use and undesignated disposal of Covid-19 related personal protective equipments (PPEs) has resulted in a spike in the global mismanagement of plastic waste. Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has not only affected the socio-economic state of the world but is contributing significantly to the already existing aquatic pollution dilemma. Consequently, PPE litter is an emerging pollutant in aquatic ecosystems that warrants significant attention. This review endeavoured to present a synopsis of the global mismanagement of PPE waste and highlight the devastating ramifications of the ensuing environment. The paper reveals that PPE litter is indeed negatively impacting environmental systems on varying levels around the globe. Furthermore, peak plastic loads are transported by Asian rivers and are deposited into the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Beaches and seabed are the major sinks of Covid-19 PPE litter making benthic organisms to be the most vulnerable. More studies need to be undertaken to monitor aquatic resources to get a detailed overview of Covid-19 PPE litter in the environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Oct;159:111517 [PMID: 32763564]
  2. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Jan;162:111840 [PMID: 33248673]
  3. J Hazard Mater. 2021 Oct 5;419:126507 [PMID: 34323718]
  4. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 10;824:153771 [PMID: 35182619]
  5. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152046 [PMID: 34856280]
  6. J Hazard Mater. 2021 Sep 5;417:126036 [PMID: 34015713]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138813 [PMID: 32334159]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 1;750:141514 [PMID: 32835961]
  9. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Jul;168:112386 [PMID: 33901902]
  10. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Feb;163:111879 [PMID: 33385799]
  11. Ocean Coast Manag. 2021 Jul 1;208:105613 [PMID: 36568706]
  12. Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 20;46(6):3060-75 [PMID: 22321064]
  13. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 1;737:140279 [PMID: 32563114]
  14. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022 Mar;176:113474 [PMID: 35231785]
  15. Chemosphere. 2021 Sep;278:130357 [PMID: 33823347]
  16. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007 Oct;3(4):559-61 [PMID: 18046805]
  17. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Jul;168:112419 [PMID: 33930644]
  18. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 10;790:148130 [PMID: 34091337]
  19. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jul;156:111216 [PMID: 32366369]
  20. Chemosphere. 2021 Apr;268:129360 [PMID: 33360141]
  21. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Feb;151:110858 [PMID: 32056640]
  22. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:333-349 [PMID: 27232963]
  23. Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Nov 7;51(21):12246-12253 [PMID: 29019247]
  24. J Hazard Mater. 2021 Sep 5;417:125938 [PMID: 34010776]
  25. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Dec;27(12):3181-3186 [PMID: 33052188]
  26. Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jul 7;54(13):7760-7765 [PMID: 32531154]
  27. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;227:1-53 [PMID: 24158578]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:740-747 [PMID: 29454214]
  29. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Aug;169:112497 [PMID: 34022562]
  30. Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 30;7(18): [PMID: 33931460]
  31. Chemosphere. 2017 Mar;171:248-258 [PMID: 28024210]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 23;118(47): [PMID: 34751160]
  33. Chem Eng J. 2021 Feb 1;405:126683 [PMID: 32834764]
  34. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 10;816:151650 [PMID: 34780824]
  35. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 1;763:144365 [PMID: 33360513]
  36. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 10;816:151562 [PMID: 34767889]
  37. Environ Pollut. 2021 Jan 15;269:116160 [PMID: 33316501]
  38. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(5):7951-7960 [PMID: 32863738]
  39. Environ Pollut. 2016 Jul;214:585-588 [PMID: 27131818]
  40. J Hazard Mater. 2022 Mar 15;426:128070 [PMID: 34922133]
  41. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 20;774:145774 [PMID: 33592402]
  42. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022 Jan;174:113181 [PMID: 34894579]
  43. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 1;798:149282 [PMID: 34332387]
  44. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 15;778:146220 [PMID: 33711590]
  45. Environ Pollut. 2018 Apr;235:1030-1034 [PMID: 29370948]
  46. Heliyon. 2021 Feb;7(2):e06343 [PMID: 33655084]
  47. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 May;166:112232 [PMID: 33725563]
  48. Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 10;820:153261 [PMID: 35065109]
  49. J Hazard Mater. 2022 Jan 15;422:126945 [PMID: 34449351]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PPEaquaticlitterCOVID-19protectivesystemspersonalglobalmismanagementplasticwasteenvironmentCovid-19equipmentuseundesignateddisposalrelatedequipmentsPPEsresultedspikeMoreoverSARS-CoV-2pandemicaffectedsocio-economicstateworldcontributingsignificantlyalreadyexistingpollutiondilemmaConsequentlyemergingpollutantecosystemswarrantssignificantattentionreviewendeavouredpresentsynopsishighlightdevastatingramificationsensuingpaperrevealsindeednegativelyimpactingenvironmentalvaryinglevelsaroundglobeFurthermorepeakloadstransportedAsianriversdepositedPacificIndianOceansBeachesseabedmajorsinksmakingbenthicorganismsvulnerablestudiesneedundertakenmonitorresourcesgetdetailedoverviewPrevalenceimpactassociatedfaunaAquaticMicroplasticsPersonal

Similar Articles

Cited By