Has the COVID-19 pandemic made us more materialistic? The effect of COVID-19 and lockdown restrictions on the endorsement of materialism.

Olaya Moldes, Denitsa Dineva, Lisbeth Ku
Author Information
  1. Olaya Moldes: Department of Marketing and Strategy, Cardiff Business School Cardiff University Cardiff UK. ORCID
  2. Denitsa Dineva: Department of Marketing and Strategy, Cardiff Business School Cardiff University Cardiff UK. ORCID
  3. Lisbeth Ku: School of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences De Montfort University Leicester UK. ORCID

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the factors that typically facilitate the endorsement of materialistic values (e.g., higher media consumption, stress and anxiety, loneliness, death anxiety, and lower moods). In this paper, we examine how contextual changes affecting the antecedents of materialism influence its advocacy with a mixed-method approach. First, a correlational study (Study 1) suggests that increases in media consumption and stress and anxiety during the pandemic predicted current levels of materialism, however, these effects were limited. Second, contrary to our expectations, a longitudinal study (Study 2) shows that people's focus on money decreased during the pandemic. Last, a social media content analysis (Study 3) reveals a downward trend in users' online discourses about consumption-related behaviors, but an upward trend in brands promoting spending as a way to attain well-being. The observed effects could fuel deeper societal change in the labor market and in consumer behavior, and have further implications for individual and societal well-being in a post-pandemic world. We recommend future interventions aimed at diminishing materialistic attitudes to examine the effects of decreasing media consumption and to explore how other factors introduced by the pandemic (e.g., a health or well-being focus) might moderate its advocacy.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Mark. 2022 May;39(5):892-905 [PMID: 35465462]
  2. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;34(1):17-31 [PMID: 17989212]
  3. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  4. Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):457-66 [PMID: 18522056]
  5. Psychol Mark. 2020 Oct;37(10):1433-1445 [PMID: 32836727]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov;107(5):879-924 [PMID: 25347131]
  7. J Res Pers. 2009 Jun;73(3):291-306 [PMID: 20161160]
  8. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:284-289 [PMID: 32536736]
  9. Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 14;3:44 [PMID: 22457655]
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Aug;65(2):410-22 [PMID: 8366427]
  11. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 [PMID: 11392867]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1193-202 [PMID: 14674824]
  13. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  14. Psychol Sci. 2000 Jul;11(4):348-51 [PMID: 11273398]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 06;17(9): [PMID: 32384598]
  16. J Consum Aff. 2021 May 31;: [PMID: 34226753]
  17. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14): [PMID: 32668635]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pandemicmediaconsumptionmaterialismeffectsCOVID-19anxietyStudywell-beingfactorsendorsementmaterialisticegstressexaminecontextualadvocacystudyfocusmoneytrendsocietalchangeledincreasetypicallyfacilitatevalueshigherlonelinessdeathlowermoodspaperchangesaffectingantecedentsinfluencemixed-methodapproachFirstcorrelational1suggestsincreasespredictedcurrentlevelshoweverlimitedSecondcontraryexpectationslongitudinal2showspeople'sdecreasedLastsocialcontentanalysis3revealsdownwardusers'onlinediscoursesconsumption-relatedbehaviorsupwardbrandspromotingspendingwayattainobservedfueldeeperlabormarketconsumerbehaviorimplicationsindividualpost-pandemicworldrecommendfutureinterventionsaimeddiminishingattitudesdecreasingexploreintroducedhealthmightmoderatemadeusmaterialistic?effectlockdownrestrictionsCOVID‐19attitude

Similar Articles

Cited By