Analysis of wheat flour-insect powder mixtures based on their near infrared spectra.

Eszter Benes, Barbara Biró, Marietta Fodor, Attila Gere
Author Information
  1. Eszter Benes: Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Department of Food and Analytical Chemistry, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út, 29-43, Hungary.
  2. Barbara Biró: Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Department of Postharvest, Supply Chain, Commerce and Sensory Science, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út 29-43, Hungary.
  3. Marietta Fodor: Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Department of Food and Analytical Chemistry, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út, 29-43, Hungary.
  4. Attila Gere: Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Department of Postharvest, Supply Chain, Commerce and Sensory Science, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út 29-43, Hungary.

Abstract

Insects are gaining more and more space in food and feed sectors, creating an intense scientific interest towards insects as food ingredients. Several papers deal with cereal-based products complemented by insect powder in the past few years. However, adulteration and quality control of such products present some hot topics for researchers, , how can we justify the amounts and/or species of the insects used in the given products? Our paper aims to answer such questions by analysing seven edible insect powders of different species independently. The mixtures with wheat flour were analysed using near infrared spectroscopy and chemometric methods. Not only powders of different species were clearly differentiated, but also mixtures created by different amounts of wheat flour. Prediction of insect content showed 0.65% cross-validated error. The proposed methodology gives an excellent tool for quality control of insect-based cereal food products.

Keywords

References

  1. Foods. 2020 Jun 18;9(6): [PMID: 32570724]
  2. Food Chem. 2014;152:316-22 [PMID: 24444943]
  3. Front Chem. 2019 Feb 22;7:48 [PMID: 30854368]
  4. Foods. 2020 Oct 28;9(11): [PMID: 33126518]
  5. Molecules. 2021 Oct 22;26(21): [PMID: 34770798]
  6. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 May;57(5):802-23 [PMID: 23471778]
  7. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 7;11(1):14030 [PMID: 34234157]
  8. Foods. 2019 Oct 02;8(10): [PMID: 31581610]
  9. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 04;23(3): [PMID: 35163720]
  10. Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Apr 22;7(5):1807-1815 [PMID: 31139394]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0insectfoodproductscontrolspeciesdifferentmixtureswheatflourinfraredinsectspowderqualityamountspowdersnearspectroscopyInsectsgainingspacefeedsectorscreatingintensescientificinteresttowardsingredientsSeveralpapersdealcereal-basedcomplementedpastyearsHoweveradulterationpresenthottopicsresearcherscanjustifyand/orusedgivenproducts?paperaimsanswerquestionsanalysingsevenedibleindependentlyanalysedusingchemometricmethodsclearlydifferentiatedalsocreatedPredictioncontentshowed065%cross-validatederrorproposedmethodologygivesexcellenttoolinsect-basedcerealAnalysisflour-insectbasedspectraEdibleEntomophagyNearQualityWheat

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)