Exposing medical students to various difficulty levels of simulated endotracheal intubations improves success rate: a randomised non-blinded trial.

Roy Kazan, Marilù Giacalone, Jiaru Liu, Etrusca Brogi, Shantale Cyr, Thomas M Hemmerling
Author Information
  1. Roy Kazan: Division of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  2. Marilù Giacalone: Department of Anesthesia, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  3. Jiaru Liu: Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  4. Etrusca Brogi: Department of Anesthesia, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  5. Shantale Cyr: Division of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  6. Thomas M Hemmerling: Division of Experimental Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

Objective: Simulation training of endotracheal intubation (ETI) has proven to be an effective training tool. We used an adjustable airway mannequin that allows the achievement of various difficulty levels of laryngoscopy to train inexperienced medical students. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of training using this novel airway mannequin on ETI success rates of medical students.
Methods: This was a randomised non-blinded trial conducted at the Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning. Twenty recruited medical students were randomly allocated to two different training groups. During training, the mixed training group was asked to perform successful intubations in three levels of difficulty; the standard training group was asked to perform the same number of successful intubations in one level of difficulty. After training, all participants were asked to perform intubations using both the adjustable airway mannequin and a standard mannequin. Success rates and airway surface area visualised were compared between the two groups.
Results: Students in the mixed training group had a significantly higher success rate both in the adjustable airway mannequin (p=0.01) and in the standard mannequin (p=0.02). Students in the mixed group had 51%, 59% and 47% significantly more visual area surface than students in the standard group during standard and difficult setup of the adjustable airway mannequin and the standard airway mannequin, respectively.
Conclusions: The use of an adjustable airway mannequin to train medical students leads to superior ETI success rates and better glottis visualisation.

Keywords

References

  1. Simul Healthc. 2012 Jun;7(3):183-91 [PMID: 22333883]
  2. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204 [PMID: 8638791]
  3. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2012 Sep;25(3):156-65 [PMID: 23997671]
  4. Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28 [PMID: 16147767]
  5. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 May;22(5):337-40 [PMID: 15918380]
  6. Anesthesiology. 2001 Aug;95(2):343-8 [PMID: 11506104]
  7. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 07;2013:652956 [PMID: 24311981]
  8. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):862-8 [PMID: 20966442]
  9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Feb 28;14:10 [PMID: 24575885]
  10. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Mar;64(3):204-11 [PMID: 23560184]
  11. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jan;98(1):23-7 [PMID: 12502974]
  12. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11 [PMID: 6507827]
  13. Anesth Analg. 1998 Mar;86(3):635-9 [PMID: 9495429]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mannequintrainingairwaystudentsstandardadjustablemedicalsuccessgroupdifficultyintubationsendotrachealETIlevelsratesmixedaskedperformSimulationintubationvariouslaryngoscopytrainusingrandomisednon-blindedtrialtwogroupssuccessfulsurfaceareaStudentssignificantlyratep=0Objective:proveneffectivetoolusedallowsachievementinexperiencedpurposestudyevaluateeffectnovelMethods:conductedSteinbergCentreInteractiveLearningTwentyrecruitedrandomlyallocateddifferentthreenumberonelevelparticipantsSuccessvisualisedcomparedResults:higher010251%59%47%visualdifficultsetuprespectivelyConclusions:useleadssuperiorbetterglottisvisualisationExposingsimulatedimprovesrate:simulation

Similar Articles

Cited By