The impact of parental monitoring on cyberbullying victimization in the COVID-19 era.

Seung Yeop Paek, Julak Lee, Yeon-Jun Choi
Author Information
  1. Seung Yeop Paek: Department of Criminal Justice California State University, East Bay Hayward California USA. ORCID
  2. Julak Lee: Department of Industrial Security Chung-Ang University Seoul Korea. ORCID
  3. Yeon-Jun Choi: Department of Aviation Security Protection Kwangju Women's University Gwangju Korea.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the current research was to examine the predictors of cyberbullying victimization among South Korean students during a period in which the coronavirus disease was spreading worldwide. We assessed whether parental guardianship protected against victimization when most people worked from home and school instructions were shifted to online learning.
Methods: We analyzed nationally representative data collected between October 6 and November 13, 2020. Binary logistic regression models were developed based on the Routine Activities Theory theoretical model to investigate the correlates of cyberbullying victimization among participants.
Results: The results showed that respondents' routine online activities were closely related to victimization, and parental guardianship provided partial protection by reducing non-violent victimization.
Conclusion: Parents could play a critical role in protecting children from cyberbullying victimization. Future research should continue to investigate the impact of parenting on reducing cyberbullying victimization, specifically the effects of different parenting styles and protections.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Dec;55:102171 [PMID: 32836633]
  2. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Apr;60(5):598-615 [PMID: 25326463]
  3. MMWR Suppl. 2020 Aug 21;69(1):28-37 [PMID: 32817605]
  4. J Youth Adolesc. 2010 May;39(5):446-59 [PMID: 20072852]
  5. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Aug;17(8):551-5 [PMID: 25080013]
  6. J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):NP8498-NP8519 [PMID: 31006326]
  7. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014 Aug 01;5:143-58 [PMID: 25177157]
  8. Can J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;65(10):701-709 [PMID: 32662303]
  9. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Aug;60(10):1119-39 [PMID: 25733745]
  10. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2020 Aug-Dec;2:100029 [PMID: 34235292]
  11. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Mar;113:104923 [PMID: 33465726]
  12. Am J Crim Justice. 2020;45(4):546-562 [PMID: 32837157]
  13. J Interpers Violence. 2019 Sep;34(18):3807-3832 [PMID: 29294606]
  14. Soc Sci Q. 2022 Mar;103(2):294-305 [PMID: 35602177]
  15. Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):841-852 [PMID: 32319041]
  16. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Nov;168(11):1015-22 [PMID: 25178884]
  17. Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;62(6):374-380 [PMID: 28562094]
  18. Comput Secur. 2021 Jun;105:102248 [PMID: 36540648]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0victimizationcyberbullyingparentalguardianshipresearchamongSouthonlineinvestigateroutineactivitiesreducingimpactparentingObjective:purposecurrentexaminepredictorsKoreanstudentsperiodcoronavirusdiseasespreadingworldwideassessedwhetherprotectedpeopleworkedhomeschoolinstructionsshiftedlearningMethods:analyzednationallyrepresentativedatacollectedOctober6November132020BinarylogisticregressionmodelsdevelopedbasedRoutineActivitiesTheorytheoreticalmodelcorrelatesparticipantsResults:resultsshowedrespondents'closelyrelatedprovidedpartialprotectionnon-violentConclusion:ParentsplaycriticalroleprotectingchildrenFuturecontinuespecificallyeffectsdifferentstylesprotectionsmonitoringCOVID-19eraCOVID‐19Koreatheory

Similar Articles

Cited By