Talocalcaneal Tarsal Coalition Size: Evaluation and Reproducibility of MRI Measurements.

Bridget K Ellsworth, Clare Kehoe, Christopher J DeFrancesco, Eric Bogner, Douglas N Mintz, David M Scher
Author Information
  1. Bridget K Ellsworth: Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The size of talocalcaneal tarsal coalitions (TCCs) is one of the main factors that is thought to influence patient outcomes after resection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used to diagnose and characterize TCCs. However, there is no reproducible MRI-based measurement of TCC size reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to create a method to reproducibly measure TCC size using MRI.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with TCCs diagnosed by a hindfoot coronal proton density (PD) MRI between 2017 and 2020 were included. Five independent raters measured coalition width, healthy posterior facet width, and healthy middle facet width on individual slices of coronal PD hindfoot MRIs using discrete MRI measurement guidelines. Individual slice measurements were summed to determine total size of the coalition and the remaining healthy cartilage of the posterior and middle facets. Inter-rater reliability of MRI measurements between the 5 independent examiners was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC was calculated for total coalition width, total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy middle facet width, total coalition width/total healthy subtalar facet width (posterior facet+middle facet), and total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (coalition+posterior facet+middle facet).
RESULTS: The ICC scores for all but one of the MRI measurements indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability among the 5 examiners. The ICC was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.966) for measurement of total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width and 0.948 (95% confidence interval: 0.908-0.973) for measurement of total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (middle+posterior+coalition).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of coalition size using novel MRI guidelines were reproducible with good to excellent inter-rater reliability. These guidelines allow for determination of TCC size using coronal PD MRI.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic reproducibility study.

References

  1. Docquier PL, Maldaque P, Bouchard M. Tarsal coalition in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2019;105(1S):S123–S131.
  2. Wilde PH, Torode IP, Dickens DR, et al. Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:797–801.
  3. Comfort TK, Johnson LO. Resection for symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:283–288.
  4. Luhmann SJ, Schoenecker PL. Symptomatic talocalcaneal coalition resection: indications and results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:748–754.
  5. Yildiz KI, Misir A, Kizkapan TB, et al. Functional and radiological outcomes after tarsal coalition resections: a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Foot Ankle Surg Off Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58:1223–1228.
  6. Kothari A, Masquijo J. Surgical treatment of tarsal coalitions in children and adolescents. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5:80–89.
  7. Stokman JJ, Mitchell J, Noonan K. Subtalar coalition resection utilizing live navigation: a technique tip. J Child Orthop. 2018;12:42–46.
  8. Aibinder WR, Young EY, Milbrandt TA. Intraoperative three-dimensional navigation for talocalcaneal coalition resection. J Foot Ankle Surg Off Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:1091–1094.
  9. Rozansky A, Varley E, Moor M, et al. A radiologic classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on 3D reconstruction. J Child Orthop. 2010;4:129–135.
  10. Emery KH, Bisset GS, Johnson ND, et al. Tarsal coalition: a blinded comparison of MRI and CT. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:612–616.
  11. Wechsler RJ, Schweitzer ME, Deely DM, et al. Tarsal coalition: depiction and characterization with CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;193:447–452.
  12. Masciocchi C, D’Archivio C, Barile A, et al. Talocalcaneal coalition: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis. Eur J Radiol. 1992;15:22–25.
  13. Sijbrandij ES, van Gils APG, de Lange EE, et al. Bone marrow ill-defined hyperintensities with tarsal coalition: MR imaging findings. Eur J Radiol. 2002;43:61–65.
  14. Bixby SD, Jarrett DY, Johnston P, et al. Posteromedial subtalar coalitions: prevalence and associated morphological alterations of the sustentaculum tali. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46:1142–1149.

MeSH Term

Carpal Bones
Foot Deformities, Congenital
Hand Deformities, Congenital
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Stapes
Subtalar Joint
Synostosis
Tarsal Bones
Tarsal Coalition

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0widthfacetcoalitionMRItotalhealthysizeposteriorwidth/totalusingmeasurementICC0TCCsTCCcoronalPDmiddleguidelinesmeasurementsreliabilitysubtalaronereproduciblestudyhindfootindependent5examinersfacet+middlegoodexcellentinter-rater95%confidenceinterval:MeasurementsBACKGROUND:talocalcanealtarsalcoalitionsmainfactorsthoughtinfluencepatientoutcomesresectionMagneticresonanceimagingincreasinglyuseddiagnosecharacterizeHoweverMRI-basedreportedliteraturepurposecreatemethodreproduciblymeasureMETHODS:Twenty-sevenpatientsdiagnosedprotondensity20172020includedFiveratersmeasuredindividualslicesMRIsdiscreteIndividualslicesummeddetermineremainingcartilagefacetsInter-raterevaluatedintraclasscorrelationcoefficientcalculatedcoalition+posteriorRESULTS:scoresindicatedamong932881-0966948908-0973middle+posterior+coalitionCONCLUSIONS:novelallowdeterminationLEVELOFEVIDENCE:LevelII-diagnosticreproducibilityTalocalcanealTarsalCoalitionSize:EvaluationReproducibility

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.