Principal regression for high dimensional covariance matrices.

Yi Zhao, Brian Caffo, Xi Luo, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Author Information
  1. Yi Zhao: Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine.
  2. Brian Caffo: Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
  3. Xi Luo: Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Abstract

This manuscript presents an approach to perform generalized linear regression with multiple high dimensional covariance matrices as the outcome. In many areas of study, such as resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, this type of regression can be utilized to characterize variation in the covariance matrices across units. Model parameters are estimated by maximizing a likelihood formulation of a generalized linear model, conditioning on a well-conditioned linear shrinkage estimator for multiple covariance matrices, where the shrinkage coefficients are proposed to be shared across matrices. Theoretical studies demonstrate that the proposed covariance matrix estimator is optimal achieving the uniformly minimum quadratic loss asymptotically among all linear combinations of the identity matrix and the sample covariance matrix. Under certain regularity conditions, the proposed estimator of the model parameters is consistent. The superior performance of the proposed approach over existing methods is illustrated through simulation studies. Implemented to a resting-state fMRI study acquired from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, the proposed approach identified a brain network within which functional connectivity is significantly associated with Apolipoprotein E 4, a strong genetic marker for Alzheimer's disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):687-97 [PMID: 21722740]
  2. Biostatistics. 2021 Jul 17;22(3):629-645 [PMID: 31851318]
  3. Science. 1993 Aug 13;261(5123):921-3 [PMID: 8346443]
  4. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Apr 18;8:73-85 [PMID: 28560308]
  5. Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:304-21 [PMID: 23298747]
  6. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Mar;33(3):466-78 [PMID: 20541837]
  7. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19 [PMID: 15501092]
  8. BMC Med. 2019 Mar 20;17(1):64 [PMID: 30890171]
  9. Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:478-491 [PMID: 29391241]
  10. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2020 Feb;142: [PMID: 32863492]
  11. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jul;35(7):2978-94 [PMID: 24123475]
  12. Neuroimage. 2020 May 1;211:116604 [PMID: 32062083]
  13. Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):1173-84 [PMID: 11764258]
  14. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009 Jun 1;104(486):682-693 [PMID: 20617121]
  15. Med Image Anal. 2019 May;54:138-148 [PMID: 30903965]
  16. Front Neurosci. 2017 Dec 12;11:696 [PMID: 29311777]

Grants

  1. P41 EB031771/NIBIB NIH HHS
  2. R01 EB022911/NIBIB NIH HHS
  3. P30 AG010133/NIA NIH HHS
  4. U01 AG024904/NIA NIH HHS
  5. U54 AG065181/NIA NIH HHS
  6. R01 EB029977/NIBIB NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0covariancelinearmatricesproposedregressionestimatormatrixapproachgeneralizedstudiesshrinkagemultiplehighdimensionalstudyresting-statefunctionalfMRIacrossparametersmodelAlzheimer'smanuscriptpresentsperformoutcomemanyareasmagneticresonanceimagingtypecanutilizedcharacterizevariationunitsModelestimatedmaximizinglikelihoodformulationconditioningwell-conditionedcoefficientssharedTheoreticaldemonstrateoptimalachievinguniformlyminimumquadraticlossasymptoticallyamongcombinationsidentitysamplecertainregularityconditionsconsistentsuperiorperformanceexistingmethodsillustratedsimulationImplementedacquiredDiseaseNeuroimagingInitiativeidentifiedbrainnetworkwithinconnectivitysignificantlyassociatedApolipoproteinE4stronggeneticmarkerdiseasePrincipalCovarianceestimationPrimary62J99heteroscedasticitysecondary62H99

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)