Identifying Suitable Cognitive Assessments for Children and Adolescents with Acquired Brain Injury for use by Occupational Therapists in Acute and Subacute Hospital Contexts: A Scoping Review.
Ashleigh Bailey, Taylor Chenoweth, Zoe Fisher, Michaela Joannides, Samantha Watters, Jodie Mazzucchelli, Susan Taylor, Courtenay Harris
Author Information
Ashleigh Bailey: School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. ORCID
Taylor Chenoweth: School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Zoe Fisher: School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Michaela Joannides: School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Samantha Watters: Occupational Therapy Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Perth, Australia.
Jodie Mazzucchelli: Occupational Therapy Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Perth, Australia.
Susan Taylor: School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. ORCID
Courtenay Harris: School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. ORCID
AIM: To appraise the literature evaluating psychometric properties and clinical utility of cognitive assessments available for use by occupational therapists in acute and subacute hospital contexts with children aged 4-18 years diagnosed with an acquired brain injury. METHODS: Scoping review. Assessments and associated studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality using the COnsensus-based standard for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) strategy. RESULTS: Forty-one studies evaluated 49 different assessments and reported on assessment psychometrics (n = 40), clinical utility (n = 1) and five reported on both. Fourteen assessments with the strongest psychometric properties and clinical utility were shortlisted. CONCLUSION: A gold standard assessment was not identified. Instead, a shortlist of functional, performance-based, technology-based, and self-report assessments were identified as relevant for the setting and population, but requiring further investigation. Future development of a cognitive assessment in partnership with therapists working in tertiary pediatric settings will ensure optimal clinical utility and validity.
