Understanding Chinese Consumers' Livestreaming Impulsive Buying: An Stimulus-Organism-Response Perspective and the Mediating Role of Emotions and Zhong Yong Tendency.

Hongli Gao, Xinzhi Chen, Hongling Gao, Bin Yu
Author Information
  1. Hongli Gao: School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Xinzhi Chen: School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
  3. Hongling Gao: School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China.
  4. Bin Yu: School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

We built a livestreaming Impulsive buying model based on stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory, and we explored the impact of atmospheric cues (ACELS) and sales promotion (SPELS) on Impulsive buying (IBI) based on emotions (EOC) and Zhong Yong tendency (ZYT) of online consumers. Combined with holistic orientation, perspective integration, and harmony maintenance, ZYT is a cognitive process involving individual events. We gathered 478 samples using a questionnaire to test the proposed research model. The empirical findings show that as the stimuli in the livestreaming environment, ACELS and SPELS during livestreaming greatly boost EOC while significantly constraining consumers' ZYT. Among online consumers, positive EOC promotes IBI, whereas ZYT dampens it. In addition, EOC and ZYT mediate the relationship between stimulus factors and response factors in parallel, resulting in four model mediation paths. By incorporating the SOR model, this study provides theoretical underpinnings for the role of cognitive processing in Impulsive purchases, as well as useful guidance for e-commerce platforms and streamers to effectively understand Chinese consumers' purchase behavior, which benefits the development of effective promotion strategies and the creation of powerful marketing tools.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 19;5:1316 [PMID: 25477842]
  2. Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 12;11:381 [PMID: 32226403]
  3. Global Health. 2020 Jul 6;16(1):57 [PMID: 32631403]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21): [PMID: 34769636]
  5. Psychophysiology. 2002 May;39(3):281-91 [PMID: 12212647]
  6. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):99 [PMID: 20157642]
  7. Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 04;12:767876 [PMID: 34803849]
  8. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:596232 [PMID: 33192942]
  9. Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 07;10:207 [PMID: 30833914]
  10. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Jun;104(3):283-301 [PMID: 10900697]
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Aug;99(2):232-47 [PMID: 20658841]
  12. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1774 [PMID: 32849051]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ZYTlivestreamingimpulsivemodelEOCbuyingSORZhongYongbasedtheoryatmosphericcuesACELSpromotionSPELSIBItendencyonlineconsumerscognitiveconsumers'factorsChinesebuiltstimulus-organism-responseexploredimpactsalesemotionsCombinedholisticorientationperspectiveintegrationharmonymaintenanceprocessinvolvingindividualeventsgathered478samplesusingquestionnairetestproposedresearchempiricalfindingsshowstimulienvironmentgreatlyboostsignificantlyconstrainingAmongpositivepromoteswhereasdampensadditionmediaterelationshipstimulusresponseparallelresultingfourmediationpathsincorporatingstudyprovidestheoreticalunderpinningsroleprocessingpurchaseswellusefulguidancee-commerceplatformsstreamerseffectivelyunderstandpurchasebehaviorbenefitsdevelopmenteffectivestrategiescreationpowerfulmarketingtoolsUnderstandingConsumers'LivestreamingImpulsiveBuying:Stimulus-Organism-ResponsePerspectiveMediatingRoleEmotionsTendency

Similar Articles

Cited By