Validation of Persian Version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in Iranian Women with Breast Cancer.

Roghieh Nooripour, Nikzad Ghanbari, Peyman Hassani-Abharian, Laurel E Radwin, Simin Hosseinian, Saba Hasanvandi
Author Information
  1. Roghieh Nooripour: Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. ORCID
  2. Nikzad Ghanbari: Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Tehran, Iran.
  3. Peyman Hassani-Abharian: Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (IRICSS), Department of Cognitive Rehabilitation, Brain and Cognition Clinic, Tehran, Iran. ORCID
  4. Laurel E Radwin: Center for Health Care Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
  5. Simin Hosseinian: Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
  6. Saba Hasanvandi: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanistic Sciences, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorram Abad, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is now the most significant health issue in women, threatening diverse aspects of human health, including mental health and cognitive function. This research aimed to validate the Persian version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in Iranian women with breast cancer.
METHODS: We gathered data on 229 women with breast cancer in Tehran through convenience sampling. They completed a demographic questionnaire, the Persian version of MAAS, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and DASS-21. SPSS-22 analyzed the Pearson correlation between the Persian version of MAAS, general self-efficacy, and DASS-21. Also, LISREL 8.8 was used to analyze the internal structure of the MAAS.
RESULTS: Findings from the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the model with one factor fits well with the data (��=4.29 (=0.36); SRMR=0.058; CFI=1.0; NFI=0.91; IFI=0.95; RFI=0.97; GFI=0.90; RMSEA=0.069). Significant negative correlations were found between MAAS and DASS-21 scores for anxiety (r=-0.51), depression (r=-0.48) and stress (r=-0.49), indicating an acceptable divergent validity. There was also a positive relationship between MAAS and general self-efficacy (r=0.37; <0.01).
CONCLUSION: The Persian version of MAAS seems to be a valid scale for evaluating the extent of mindfulness of Iranian women with breast cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Summer;32(3):A4-212 [PMID: 32729793]
  2. Int J Cancer. 2015 May 1;136(9):2187-95 [PMID: 25284703]
  3. Breast Cancer. 2020 Mar;27(2):197-205 [PMID: 31493295]
  4. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;96(3):351-8 [PMID: 10960625]
  5. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Mar 01;21(3):569-573 [PMID: 32212779]
  6. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):330-338 [PMID: 28109647]
  7. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):63-78 [PMID: 19911432]
  8. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45 [PMID: 16443717]
  9. Stress Health. 2017 Dec;33(5):549-557 [PMID: 28052491]
  10. Geriatr Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):31-6 [PMID: 17340774]
  11. Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149 [PMID: 29942800]
  12. Assessment. 2008 Jun;15(2):204-23 [PMID: 18187399]
  13. J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1226-31 [PMID: 25451829]
  14. J Clin Psychol. 2011 Mar;67(3):267-77 [PMID: 21254055]
  15. Eat Behav. 2009 Dec;10(4):228-31 [PMID: 19778752]
  16. Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28 [PMID: 11180574]
  17. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48 [PMID: 12703651]
  18. J Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;62(12):1445-67 [PMID: 17019673]
  19. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Dec;53(6):1123-30 [PMID: 12479995]
  20. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Jan;58(1):29-33 [PMID: 15771867]
  21. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb;25(2):231-8 [PMID: 26908594]
  22. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. ;18(1):215-224 [PMID: 28240522]
  23. Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;47(Pt 4):451-5 [PMID: 18573227]
  24. J Pers Assess. 2005 Aug;85(1):17-32 [PMID: 16083381]
  25. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar;28(2):e12984 [PMID: 30628124]
  26. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Jan;7(1):17-32 [PMID: 8435051]
  27. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):31-42 [PMID: 26513636]
  28. Assessment. 2004 Sep;11(3):191-206 [PMID: 15358875]
  29. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Jul;32(7):900-7 [PMID: 27343745]
  30. Adv Nutr. 2016 Mar 15;7(2):418-9 [PMID: 26980827]
  31. Acta Oncol. 2017 Dec;56(12):1665-1676 [PMID: 28686520]
  32. Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jan;35(1):79-89 [PMID: 9009048]
  33. Psychosom Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;62(5):613-22 [PMID: 11020090]

MeSH Term

Attention
Awareness
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Humans
Iran
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MAAScancerwomenPersianversionScaleIranianBreasthealthMindfulAttentionAwarenessbreastDASS-21r=-0datageneralself-efficacy8factorBACKGROUND:nowsignificantissuethreateningdiverseaspectshumanincludingmentalcognitivefunctionresearchaimedvalidateMETHODS:gathered229TehranconveniencesamplingcompleteddemographicquestionnaireGeneralSelf-EfficacySPSS-22analyzedPearsoncorrelationAlsoLISRELusedanalyzeinternalstructureRESULTS:FindingsconfirmatoryanalysisCFAshowedmodelonefitswell��=429=036SRMR=0058CFI=10NFI=091IFI=095RFI=097GFI=090RMSEA=0069Significantnegativecorrelationsfoundscoresanxiety51depression48stress49indicatingacceptabledivergentvalidityalsopositiverelationshipr=037<001CONCLUSION:seemsvalidscaleevaluatingextentmindfulnessValidationVersionWomenCancerMindfulness

Similar Articles

Cited By