Acupuncture and moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Yang Fang, Bo-Wen Yue, Han-Bo Ma, Yi-Peng Yuan
Author Information
  1. Yang Fang: School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  2. Bo-Wen Yue: Shenzhen Bao'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China. ORCID
  3. Han-Bo Ma: School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  4. Yi-Peng Yuan: School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research into acupuncture and moxibustion and their application for chronic Fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been growing, but the findings have been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs), compare the efficacy of acupuncture, moxibustion and other traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatments.
DATA SOURCES: Three English-language databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library) and 4 Chinese-language biomedical databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang) were searched for RCTs published from database inception through August 2021.
STUDY SELECTION: RCTs include acupuncture, moxibustion, traditional Chinese herbal medicine, western medicine and no control.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were screened and extracted independently using predesigned forms. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework. We assessed the certainty of evidence contributing to network estimates of the main outcomes with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the overall response rate and FS-14 scale.
RESULTS: A total of 51 randomized controlled trials involving 3473 patients with CFS were included in this review. Forty one studies indicate low risk or unknown risk, and the GRADE scores of the combined results show low levels. Among the main indicators, traditional Chinese medicine therapies have excellent performance. However, the overall response rate is slightly different from the results obtained from the Fatigue Scale-14 total score. Moxibustion and traditional Chinese medicine (Odds ratios 48, 95% CrI 15-150) perform better in the total effective rate, while moxibustion plus acupuncture (MD 4.5, 95% CrI 3.0-5.9) is better in the FS-14 total score.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of CFS was significantly higher than that of other treatments. Traditional Chinese medicine should be used more widely in the treatment of CFS.

References

  1. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021 Mar 12;41(3):269-74 [PMID: 33798308]
  2. J Exp Med. 2010 Jan 18;207(1):117-28 [PMID: 20026663]
  3. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):170 [PMID: 32782377]
  4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135 [PMID: 25524443]
  5. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Nov 12;37(11):1187-90 [PMID: 29354956]
  6. J Cell Biol. 2008 Apr 7;181(1):37-41 [PMID: 18378771]
  7. Epidemiol Health. 2017 Oct 27;39:e2017047 [PMID: 29092392]
  8. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2009 Oct;29(10):780-4 [PMID: 19873911]
  9. Med J Aust. 2020 May;212(9):428-433 [PMID: 32248536]
  10. Neuroscience. 2011 Jun 30;185:106-15 [PMID: 21540081]
  11. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 03;9(7):e99682 [PMID: 24992266]
  12. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 03;8(10):e76654 [PMID: 24098547]
  13. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):470 [PMID: 27852302]
  14. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):163 [PMID: 28335756]
  15. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 01;179(10):1388-1397 [PMID: 31355870]
  16. J Tradit Chin Med. 2020 Apr;40(2):267-274 [PMID: 32242392]
  17. BMJ. 2010 Feb 11;340:c738 [PMID: 20150199]
  18. Acupunct Med. 2019 Aug;37(4):211-222 [PMID: 31204859]
  19. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):221-36 [PMID: 12562565]
  20. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 18;7:606824 [PMID: 33537329]
  21. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 16;8(7):2325967120930567 [PMID: 32728589]
  22. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13 [PMID: 15840177]
  23. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Mar;15(2):55-9 [PMID: 15036250]
  24. Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 27;15:689629 [PMID: 34646113]
  25. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9 [PMID: 7978722]
  26. Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):753-762 [PMID: 30696351]
  27. Front Pediatr. 2017 Jun 19;5:121 [PMID: 28674681]
  28. Nature. 2011 Aug 03;476(7361):458-61 [PMID: 21814201]
  29. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018 Oct;367(1):155-167 [PMID: 30076265]
  30. Neuroreport. 2009 Apr 22;20(6):553-7 [PMID: 19322118]
  31. J Evid Based Med. 2018 Aug;11(3):176-183 [PMID: 29266878]
  32. BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 4;8(9):e020817 [PMID: 30181183]
  33. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115065 [PMID: 25541687]
  34. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2014 Aug;39(4):313-7 [PMID: 25219128]
  35. J Neurovirol. 2021 Feb;27(1):154-159 [PMID: 33528827]
  36. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):223-49 [PMID: 26613325]
  37. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Jun;125:164-176 [PMID: 32302794]
  38. J Clin Med. 2020 May 21;9(5): [PMID: 32455633]
  39. Neuroscientist. 2020 Oct-Dec;26(5-6):402-414 [PMID: 32684080]
  40. Neural Regen Res. 2016 Apr;11(4):610-6 [PMID: 27212922]
  41. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jul 31;15:58 [PMID: 26227148]
  42. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53 [PMID: 8463991]
  43. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 21;21(27):8304-13 [PMID: 26217082]
  44. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Aug 07;9(3): [PMID: 31394725]

MeSH Term

Acupuncture Therapy
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic
Humans
Medicine, Chinese Traditional
Moxibustion
Network Meta-Analysis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ChinesemoxibustionmedicineacupunctureCFSRCTstraditionaltotalrisknetworkratechronicfatiguerandomizedtrialstreatmentsDATAdatabasesCochrane4DatabaseANDmeta-analysisframeworkmainoutcomesGRADEoverallresponseFS-14reviewlowresultsscore95%CrIbettertreatmentBACKGROUND:ResearchapplicationsyndromegrowingfindingsinconsistentOBJECTIVE:evaluateexistingclinicalcompareefficacyTCMSOURCES:ThreeEnglish-languagePubMedEmbaseWebScienceLibraryChinese-languagebiomedicalBiomedicalLiteratureVIPTechnicalPeriodicalsChinaNationalKnowledgeInfrastructureWanfangsearchedpublisheddatabaseinceptionAugust2021STUDYSELECTION:includeherbalwesterncontrolEXTRACTIONSYNTHESIS:DatascreenedextractedindependentlyusingpredesignedformsqualityappraisedCollaborationbiastoolconductedrandom-effectswithinfrequentistassessedcertaintyevidencecontributingestimatesGradingRecommendationsAssessmentDevelopmentEvaluationMAINOUTCOMESMEASURES:primaryscaleRESULTS:51controlledinvolving3473patientsincludedFortyonestudiesindicateunknownscorescombinedshowlevelsAmongindicatorstherapiesexcellentperformanceHoweverslightlydifferentobtainedFatigueScale-14MoxibustionOddsratios4815-150performeffectiveplusMD530-59CONCLUSIONS:effectsignificantlyhigherTraditionalusedwidelyAcupuncturesyndrome:systematic

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)