Defining and analyzing health system resilience in rural jurisdictions.

Mason Barnard, Sienna Mark, Scott L Greer, Benjamin D Trump, Igor Linkov, Holly Jarman
Author Information
  1. Mason Barnard: Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, USA. ORCID
  2. Sienna Mark: University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA. ORCID
  3. Scott L Greer: University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA. ORCID
  4. Benjamin D Trump: University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA. ORCID
  5. Igor Linkov: Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. ORCID
  6. Holly Jarman: University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Rural areas face well known and distinctive health care challenges that can limit their resilience in the face of health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. These include problems of sparsity and consequent limited health care provisioning; poverty, inequalities, and distinctive economic structures that limit access to health care; and underlying population health risks and inequalities that can increase vulnerability. Nonetheless, not all rural areas face the same problems, and non-rural areas can have challenges. To be useful in influencing policy, a tool to identify more and less resilient areas is necessary. This Commentary reviews key forms of risk and constructs a county-level index of resilience for the United States which helps to identify countries with limited resilience. Further, it argues that health care resilience should be conceptualized in terms of broader regions than counties since health care facilities' referral regions are larger than individual counties; resilience needs to be understood at that level. The index, read at the level of counties and referral regions, can contribute to identification of immediate problems as well as targets for longer term investment and policy response.

Keywords

References

  1. J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):151-7 [PMID: 16606427]
  2. BMJ. 2017 May 23;357:j2323 [PMID: 28536191]
  3. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;383(4):e16 [PMID: 32402154]
  4. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:135-154 [PMID: 34910581]
  5. JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1750-66 [PMID: 27063997]
  6. Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):578 [PMID: 35318471]
  7. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Oct;7(5):817-821 [PMID: 32651882]
  8. Cureus. 2020 Apr 4;12(4):e7538 [PMID: 32377486]
  9. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1910-2 [PMID: 25987159]
  10. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;54(4):333-6 [PMID: 23517424]
  11. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2009 Dec;47(12):28-33 [PMID: 20000280]
  12. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):418-20 [PMID: 26294709]
  13. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Oct 01;5: [PMID: 25317257]
  14. J Rural Health. 2020 Jun;36(3):446-456 [PMID: 32543751]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 5;118(1): [PMID: 33328335]
  16. J Rural Health. 2020 Sep;36(4):591-601 [PMID: 32602983]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthresiliencecareareascanfaceproblemsregionscountiesRuralwelldistinctivechallengeslimitlimitedinequalitiesruralpolicyidentifyindexreferrallevelknownemergenciesCOVID-19pandemicincludesparsityconsequentprovisioningpovertyeconomicstructuresaccessunderlyingpopulationrisksincreasevulnerabilityNonethelessnon-ruralusefulinfluencingtoollessresilientnecessaryCommentaryreviewskeyformsriskconstructscounty-levelUnitedStateshelpscountriesarguesconceptualizedtermsbroadersincefacilities'largerindividualneedsunderstoodreadcontributeidentificationimmediatetargetslongerterminvestmentresponseDefininganalyzingsystemjurisdictionsHealthsystemsResilience

Similar Articles

Cited By