The sentiment of a virtual rock concert.

Mel Slater, Carlos Cabriera, Gizem Senel, Domna Banakou, Alejandro Beacco, Ramon Oliva, Jaime Gallego
Author Information
  1. Mel Slater: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID
  2. Carlos Cabriera: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  3. Gizem Senel: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID
  4. Domna Banakou: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID
  5. Alejandro Beacco: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID
  6. Ramon Oliva: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID
  7. Jaime Gallego: Event Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

We created a virtual reality version of a 1983 performance by Dire Straits, this being a highly complex scenario consisting of both the virtual band performance and the appearance and behaviour of the virtual audience surrounding the participants. Our goal was to understand the responses of participants, and to learn how this type of scenario might be improved for later reconstructions of other concerts. To understand the responses of participants we carried out two studies which used sentiment analysis of texts written by the participants. Study 1 (���=���25) (Beacco et al. in IEEE Virtual Reality: 538-545, 2021) had the unexpected finding that negative sentiment was caused by the virtual audience, where e.g. some participants were fearful of being harassed by audience members. In Study 2 (���=���26) notwithstanding some changes, the audience again led to negative sentiment-e.g. a feeling of being stared at. For Study 2 we compared sentiment with questionnaire scores, finding that the illusion of being at the concert was associated with positive sentiment for males but negative for females. Overall, we found sentiment was dominated by responses to the audience rather than the band. Participants had been placed in an unusual situation, being alone at a concert, surrounded by strangers, who seemed to pose a social threat for some  of them. We relate our findings to the concept of Plausibility, the illusion that events and situations in the VR are really happening. The results indicate high Plausibility, since the negative sentiment, for example in response to being started at, only makes sense if the events are experienced as actually happening. We conclude with the need for co-design of VR scenarios, and the use of sentiment analysis in this process, rather than sole reliance on concepts proposed by researchers, typically expressed through questionnaires, which may not reflect the experiences of participants.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10055-022-00685-9.

Keywords

References

  1. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005 Sep;30(3):239-58 [PMID: 16167189]
  2. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 30;23(7):e26344 [PMID: 34328434]
  3. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2022 Apr;28(4):1880-1893 [PMID: 32946397]
  4. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 May;26(5):2062-2072 [PMID: 32070975]
  5. Internet Interv. 2021 Feb 02;24:100370 [PMID: 33665136]
  6. Behav Res Ther. 1996 May-Jun;34(5-6):477-81 [PMID: 8687369]
  7. Front Robot AI. 2018 Oct 04;5:112 [PMID: 33500991]
  8. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):339-52 [PMID: 19404620]
  9. J R Soc Interface. 2018 Aug;15(145): [PMID: 30111664]
  10. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1292 [PMID: 29295377]
  11. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Apr;24(4):1681-1690 [PMID: 29543183]
  12. J Trauma Stress. 1999 Apr;12(2):263-71 [PMID: 10378165]
  13. Expert Syst Appl. 2021 Apr 1;167:114155 [PMID: 33139966]
  14. Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Apr;152(4):626-8 [PMID: 7694917]
  15. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Apr;6(4):332-9 [PMID: 15803164]
  16. R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 15;8(9):210537 [PMID: 34540251]
  17. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec 23;3:59 [PMID: 20076762]
  18. Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;9:634102 [PMID: 33791269]
  19. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2017 Apr;23(4):1352-1359 [PMID: 28141523]
  20. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 12;364(1535):3549-57 [PMID: 19884149]
  21. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031 [PMID: 12239892]
  22. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0146837 [PMID: 26889676]
  23. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2017 Apr;23(4):1369-1378 [PMID: 28129171]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sentimentparticipantsvirtualaudiencenegativeresponsesanalysisStudyconcertPlausibilityrealityversionperformancescenariobandunderstandVirtualfindingg2illusionrathereventsVRhappeningcreated1983DireStraitshighlycomplexconsistingappearancebehavioursurroundinggoallearntypemightimprovedlaterreconstructionsconcertscarriedtwostudiesusedtextswritten1���=���25BeaccoetalIEEEReality:538-5452021unexpectedcausedefearfulharassedmembers���=���26notwithstandingchangesledsentiment-efeelingstaredcomparedquestionnairescoresassociatedpositivemalesfemalesOverallfounddominatedParticipantsplacedunusualsituationalonesurroundedstrangersseemedposesocialthreat ofrelatefindingsconceptsituationsreallyresultsindicatehighsinceexampleresponsestartedmakessenseexperiencedactuallyconcludeneedco-designscenariosuseprocesssolerelianceconceptsproposedresearcherstypicallyexpressedquestionnairesmayreflectexperiencesSupplementaryInformation:onlinecontainssupplementarymaterialavailable101007/s10055-022-00685-9rockConcertEvaluationPerformancePresenceSentiment

Similar Articles

Cited By