Macrolide versus Non-Macrolide in Combination with Steroids for the Treatment of Lobar or Segmental Pneumonia Unresponsive to Initial Macrolide Monotherapy.

Eunha Bae, Ye Ji Kim, Hyun Mi Kang, Dae Chul Jeong, Jin Han Kang
Author Information
  1. Eunha Bae: Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
  2. Ye Ji Kim: Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
  3. Hyun Mi Kang: Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea. ORCID
  4. Dae Chul Jeong: Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
  5. Jin Han Kang: Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.

Abstract

In the last few decades, macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) has been increasing in proportion. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of children with lobar or segmental MP pneumonia unresponsive to the initial 3−5-day macrolide therapy, who then switched to either a non-macrolide, macrolide + steroid, or a non-macrolide + steroid regimen, according to the 2019 KSPID and KAPARD guideline during the 2019−2020 Mycoplasma epidemic in South Korea. A total of 190 patients <18 years old were admitted during the study period for MP lobar or segmental pneumonia, and 16.8% (n = 32/190) were responsive to the initial macrolide monotherapy, whereas 83.2% (158/190) were refractory. The median age of the patients was 7 (interquartile range [IQR], 5−9) years old and 46.2% (n = 73/158) were male. The overall treatment success rates of non-macrolide, macrolide + steroid, and non-macrolide + steroid groups were 46.2%, 80.8%, and 100.0%, respectively. Patients in the non-macrolide + steroid group had the shortest fever duration after a regimen change of 1 (IQR, 0−3) day compared with patients in the non-macrolide group and macrolide + steroid group; 2 (IQR, 1−4) days and 2 (IQR, 1−3.3) days (p = 0.004), respectively. Follow-up CRP (ß, 0.169; CI, 0.050−0.287; p = 0.006), macrolide + steroid therapy (ß, −1.694; CI, −2.463−−0.925; p < 0.001), and non-macrolide+ steroid therapy (ß, −2.224; CI, −3.321−−1.127; p < 0.001) were shown to be significantly associated with the duration of fever after admission. To conclude, in patients with severe MP pneumonia that failed to respond to the initial macrolide therapy, a non-macrolide + steroid had the highest treatment success rate and a shorter duration of fever.

Keywords

References

  1. Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Sep-Oct;17(5):874-80 [PMID: 9324176]
  2. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 16;13:591 [PMID: 24330612]
  3. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;27(6):1588-1597 [PMID: 34013867]
  4. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Feb;11(2):101-8 [PMID: 15679483]
  5. Front Microbiol. 2016 Jun 22;7:974 [PMID: 27446015]
  6. Sci Rep. 2019 May 9;9(1):7147 [PMID: 31073201]
  7. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2018 Jan;16(1):23-34 [PMID: 29212389]
  8. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 Nov;32(6):956-73 [PMID: 18754792]
  9. J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 15;198(8):1180-8 [PMID: 18717637]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):5-12 [PMID: 29788037]
  11. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022 Aug;55(4):611-619 [PMID: 34688576]
  12. J Infect Chemother. 2019 May;25(5):346-350 [PMID: 30718192]
  13. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220949 [PMID: 35816304]
  14. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Aug;28(8):693-6 [PMID: 19633515]
  15. J Trop Pediatr. 2014 Oct;60(5):338-42 [PMID: 24710342]
  16. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Feb 17;10(2): [PMID: 33671151]
  17. J Clin Med. 2019 May 22;8(5): [PMID: 31121867]
  18. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Mar;39(3):177-183 [PMID: 31738328]
  19. Clin Respir J. 2017 Jul;11(4):419-429 [PMID: 26365811]
  20. Korean J Pediatr. 2015 May;58(5):172-7 [PMID: 26124847]
  21. Korean J Pediatr. 2017 May;60(5):151-157 [PMID: 28592978]
  22. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;19(8):1281-4 [PMID: 23876792]
  23. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2014 Dec 1;5(Suppl 1):38-51 [PMID: 31641573]
  24. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):697-728, table of contents [PMID: 15489344]
  25. Int J Dermatol. 2004 Oct;43(10):709-15 [PMID: 15485524]
  26. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Jul;30(3):747-809 [PMID: 28539503]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0steroidmacrolide+non-macrolide0therapypatients=pMycoplasmatreatmentMPpneumoniainitial2%groupfeverdurationIQRßCIpneumoniaestudylobarsegmentalregimenyearsold8%n46successrespectively2days−2<001Macrolidelastdecadesmacrolide-resistantMRMPincreasingproportionaimedevaluateoutcomeschildrenunresponsive3−5-dayswitchedeitheraccording2019KSPIDKAPARDguideline2019−2020epidemicSouthKoreatotal190<18admittedperiod1632/190responsivemonotherapywhereas83158/190refractorymedianage7interquartilerange[IQR]5−973/158maleoverallratesgroups801000%Patientsshortestchange10−3daycompared1−41−33004Follow-upCRP169050−0287006−1694463−−0925non-macrolide+224−3321−−1127shownsignificantlyassociatedadmissionconcludeseverefailedrespondhighestrateshorterversusNon-MacrolideCombinationSteroidsTreatmentLobarSegmentalPneumoniaUnresponsiveInitialMonotherapyresistance

Similar Articles

Cited By