Does institutional quality moderate the relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity? Evidence from the emerging market of Pakistan.

Shuaib Ali, Wu Zhongxin, Zahid Ali, Guo Fei, Muhammad Abir Shahid Chowdhury
Author Information
  1. Shuaib Ali: School of Management, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
  2. Wu Zhongxin: School of Management, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
  3. Zahid Ali: Department of Management Sciences and Commerce, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Pakistan.
  4. Guo Fei: School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.
  5. Muhammad Abir Shahid Chowdhury: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to empirically analyze whether Institutional Quality moderates the relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity through the light of agency and information asymmetry theory. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first finance study. The sample consists of 230 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan stock exchange during the period of 2009-2019. We used an instrumental variable approach and our new Institutional Quality index composed of world governance indicators and a corporate governance index, developed principal component analysis, to demonstrate a relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity and check the moderating role of Institutional Quality by following the resources complementary phenomenon. Our results show a significant, positive relationship between the corporate governance index and stock liquidity, suggesting that well-governed firms have high liquidity. The results show that the Institutional Quality index has a positive moderating impact on the relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity, suggesting that corporate governance in Pakistan is weak. Our results are robust to a series of endogeneity checks using alternative proxies of stock liquidity.

Keywords

References

  1. Int Migr Rev. 2011;45(2):243-68 [PMID: 22069767]
  2. PLoS One. 2018 May 2;13(5):e0196524 [PMID: 29718977]
  3. Heliyon. 2019 Jul 22;5(7):e02050 [PMID: 31372533]
  4. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:885616 [PMID: 35936339]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0governancecorporatestockliquidityInstitutionalQualityrelationshipPakistanindexresultsstudyfirmsmoderatingshowpositivesuggestingmainaimempiricallyanalyzewhethermoderateslightagencyinformationasymmetrytheorybestknowledgefirstfinancesampleconsists230non-financiallistedexchangeperiod2009-2019usedinstrumentalvariableapproachnewcomposedworldindicatorsdevelopedprincipalcomponentanalysisdemonstratecheckrolefollowingresourcescomplementaryphenomenonsignificantwell-governedhighimpactweakrobustseriesendogeneitychecksusingalternativeproxiesinstitutionalqualitymoderateliquidity?EvidenceemergingmarketPCA

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.