The suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of a culturally contextualized low-calorie diet among women at high risk for diabetes mellitus in Kerala: a mixed-methods study.

Bhagiaswari Kodapally, Zinto Vilane, Jonathan Nsamba, Anjaly Joseph, Elezebeth Mathews, Kavumpurathu Raman Thankappan
Author Information
  1. Bhagiaswari Kodapally: Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India.
  2. Zinto Vilane: Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India.
  3. Jonathan Nsamba: Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India.
  4. Anjaly Joseph: Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India.
  5. Elezebeth Mathews: Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India. ORCID
  6. Kavumpurathu Raman Thankappan: Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India.

Abstract

Background: Nutritional therapy has been conventionally recommended for people with prediabetes as a method to delay or halt progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The extensive diversity in food culture and habits in India pose a challenge in devising a uniform low-calorie diet plan. Though there are a number of studies related to different diet therapies, there exists limited evidence on culturally contextualized low-calorie diet plans and their process in India. The objective of the study is to test the suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of a culturally contextualized low-calorie diet among women with high risk for T2DM in Kerala.
Method: We employed a four-stage equal-status sequential design for this study. Firstly, in-depth interviews (���=���10) were conducted to understand the modifiable and non-modifiable components of the usual diet for diabetes prevention. Secondly, we developed a low-calorie diet plan (1500 kcal per day) based on the local preferences and availability. Thirdly, we piloted the diet plan among 18 individuals in the community to know its acceptability. Fourthly, in-depth interviews were done (���=���4) among pilot participants to understand the feasibility of pursuing it through facilitators and barriers to implementing the diet plan.
Results: Low-calorie diet plan was suitable for this setting as the burden of diabetes is very high and the diet plan had dietary components similar to the usual diet. Though participants had an intrinsic motivation to follow a healthy lifestyle, several systemic challenges such as the high cost of healthy foods options (fruits and vegetables), rice addiction, and food preferences driven by peer pressure act as hurdles.
Conclusion: Apart from culturally contextualizing the low-calorie diet, it is important that complementary strategic measures such as reorientation of the public distribution system and subsidizing fruit and vegetable production and cost are required for the suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of implementation.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13410-022-01134-8.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2018 May 23;10(6): [PMID: 29882884]
  2. Nutrition. 2015 Jan;31(1):1-13 [PMID: 25287761]
  3. Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):332-7 [PMID: 22029804]
  4. J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 09;8(10): [PMID: 31601019]
  5. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Aug;99(8 Suppl):S76-83 [PMID: 10450298]
  6. Lancet. 2006 Nov 11;368(9548):1673-9 [PMID: 17098085]
  7. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;162:108086 [PMID: 32068099]
  8. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201877 [PMID: 30133467]
  9. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014 Mar 20;10:173-88 [PMID: 24672242]
  10. Nutr J. 2012 Jul 18;11:48 [PMID: 22809556]
  11. Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Feb 15;7:62 [PMID: 36865369]
  12. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Nov 15;8(11):3569-3573 [PMID: 31803654]
  13. Metabolism. 1990 Sep;39(9):905-12 [PMID: 2392060]
  14. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):859-73 [PMID: 19246357]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403 [PMID: 11832527]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 4;17(1):974 [PMID: 29298703]
  17. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005 Sep;53:755-7 [PMID: 16334617]
  18. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020 Jul;16(7):395-400 [PMID: 32060416]
  19. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 1;15(17):5591-8 [PMID: 19671877]
  20. PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 6;15(6):e1002575 [PMID: 29874236]
  21. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1808-1817 [PMID: 29114778]
  22. Diabet Med. 2015 Sep;32(9):1149-55 [PMID: 25683066]
  23. Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):172-196 [PMID: 31994260]
  24. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2625-2627 [PMID: 33082242]
  25. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr;75(4):661-669 [PMID: 33128036]
  26. Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):731-754 [PMID: 31000505]
  27. Diabetes Care. 2003 Dec;26(12):3230-6 [PMID: 14633807]
  28. BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 30;17:101 [PMID: 27475527]
  29. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Mar;18(3):164-70 [PMID: 26741823]
  30. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):140 [PMID: 30704495]
  31. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):776-780 [PMID: 28989891]

Grants

  1. IA/CPHE/17/1/503345/DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dietlow-calorieplandiabetesculturallyacceptabilityfeasibilityamonghighcontextualizedstudysuitabilitymellitusT2DMfoodIndiaThoughwomenriskin-depthinterviewsunderstandcomponentsusualpreferencesparticipantsdietaryhealthycostBackground:Nutritionaltherapyconventionallyrecommendedpeopleprediabetesmethoddelayhaltprogressiontype2extensivediversityculturehabitsposechallengedevisinguniformnumberstudiesrelateddifferenttherapiesexistslimitedevidenceplansprocessobjectivetestKeralaMethod:employedfour-stageequal-statussequentialdesignFirstly���=���10conductedmodifiablenon-modifiablepreventionSecondlydeveloped1500 kcalperdaybasedlocalavailabilityThirdlypiloted18individualscommunityknowFourthlydone���=���4pilotpursuingfacilitatorsbarriersimplementingResults:Low-caloriesuitablesettingburdensimilarintrinsicmotivationfollowlifestyleseveralsystemicchallengesfoodsoptionsfruitsvegetablesriceaddictiondrivenpeerpressureacthurdlesConclusion:ApartcontextualizingimportantcomplementarystrategicmeasuresreorientationpublicdistributionsystemsubsidizingfruitvegetableproductionrequiredimplementationSupplementaryInformation:onlineversioncontainssupplementarymaterialavailable101007/s13410-022-01134-8Kerala:mixed-methodsAcceptabilityCulturallyappropriaterecommendationFeasibilityPrediabetes

Similar Articles

Cited By