Comparison of antimicrobial utilization metrics: Food for thought for an antimicrobial stewardship programme.

Jingshi Chen, Irene Ekaney, Punit J Shah
Author Information
  1. Jingshi Chen: Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
  2. Irene Ekaney: Department of Infectious Diseases, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Sugar Land, TX, USA.
  3. Punit J Shah: Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Sugar Land, TX, USA. Electronic address: pjshah@houstonmethodist.org.

Abstract

Given the overuse of antimicrobials and increasing antimicrobial resistance, the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend antimicrobial stewardship programmes to measure and assess the use of antimicrobials. Several antimicrobial use metrics have been described, including days of therapy, defined daily doses and standardized antimicrobial administration ratio. Understanding these metrics, including the advantages and disadvantages, can help antimicrobial stewardship programmes to monitor antimicrobial use at their institution, and assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship efforts. This review discusses the three commonly used antimicrobial use metrics, their pros and cons, and how antimicrobial stewardship programmes can use these metrics to help assess the use of antimicrobials.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Antimicrobial Stewardship
Anti-Infective Agents
Anti-Bacterial Agents

Chemicals

Anti-Infective Agents
Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0antimicrobialusestewardshipmetricsantimicrobialsprogrammesassessincludingtherapydailydosesadministrationratiocanhelpAntimicrobialGivenoveruseincreasingresistanceWorldHealthOrganizationCentersDiseaseControlPreventionrecommendmeasureSeveraldescribeddaysdefinedstandardizedUnderstandingadvantagesdisadvantagesmonitorinstitutionimpacteffortsreviewdiscussesthreecommonlyusedprosconsComparisonutilizationmetrics:FoodthoughtprogrammeDaysDefinedSAARStandardized

Similar Articles

Cited By