River Ecosystem Health Assessment Using a Combination Weighting Method: A Case Study of Beijing Section of Yongding River in China.

Linglong Chen, Lan Ma, Jiamen Jiji, Qingqi Kong, Zizhao Ni, Lin Yan, Chengzhong Pan
Author Information
  1. Linglong Chen: Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
  2. Lan Ma: Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
  3. Jiamen Jiji: Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
  4. Qingqi Kong: Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
  5. Zizhao Ni: Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
  6. Lin Yan: Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
  7. Chengzhong Pan: Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Hydrological Cycle and Sponge City Technology, College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. ORCID

Abstract

(1) Background: River health assessment provides the foundation for sustainable river development and management. However, existing assessments have no uniform standards and methods. (2) Methods: The combination weighting method was proposed, drawing on the advantages of subjective and objective weighting methods. To comprehensively investigate the river health level, an index system based on 16 indices selected from river morphology, river water environment, riparian condition, and social services level was established. The method and framework were applied to the Beijing section of Yongding River in China. (3) Results: The comprehensive weights of river morphology, river water environment, riparian condition, and social services are 0.1614, 0.3170, 0.4459, and 0.0757, respectively. The river health comprehensive index of Yongding River is 3.805; the percentages of excellent, healthy, sub-healthy, unhealthy, and sick river segments are 0%, 11%, 69%, 20%, and 0%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The results indicate that Yongding River is in a sub-healthy state, and the riparian condition is the key factor that affects the river ecosystem health. Health level exhibited a remarkable spatial variation, mainly influenced by anthropogenic activities, and effective measures are needed to minimize the impact in fragile ecological areas.

Keywords

References

  1. J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 1;196:161-167 [PMID: 28284134]
  2. J Environ Manage. 2001 Sep;63(1):27-35 [PMID: 11591027]
  3. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:304-313 [PMID: 29426153]
  4. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 15;605-606:618-625 [PMID: 28672250]
  5. Environ Monit Assess. 2017 May;189(5):205 [PMID: 28374188]
  6. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 1):1613-1627 [PMID: 30308847]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Nov 1;640-641:442-453 [PMID: 29864658]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 25;671:452-465 [PMID: 30933801]
  9. Environ Manage. 2022 Apr;69(4):752-767 [PMID: 34973072]

MeSH Term

Rivers
Ecosystem
Beijing
China
Water
Environmental Monitoring

Chemicals

Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0riverRiverhealthYongding0weightingmethodlevelriparianconditionassessmentmethodscombinationindexmorphologywaterenvironmentsocialservicesBeijingChina3comprehensiverespectivelysub-healthy0%ecosystemHealth1Background:providesfoundationsustainabledevelopmentmanagementHoweverexistingassessmentsuniformstandards2Methods:proposeddrawingadvantagessubjectiveobjectivecomprehensivelyinvestigatesystembased16indicesselectedestablishedframeworkappliedsectionResults:weights1614317044590757805percentagesexcellenthealthyunhealthysicksegments11%69%20%4Conclusions:resultsindicatestatekeyfactoraffectsexhibitedremarkablespatialvariationmainlyinfluencedanthropogenicactivitieseffectivemeasuresneededminimizeimpactfragileecologicalareasEcosystemAssessmentUsingCombinationWeightingMethod:CaseStudySection

Similar Articles

Cited By