When helping is risky: The influence of ethical attributes on consumers' willingness to buy farmer-assisting agricultural products online.

Jingjing Wu, Chao Wang, Yingzheng Yan, Qiujin Zheng
Author Information
  1. Jingjing Wu: College of Management and Economics, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
  2. Chao Wang: College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
  3. Yingzheng Yan: College of Management and Economics, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
  4. Qiujin Zheng: School of Journalism and Communication, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China.

Abstract

Chinese e-commerce platforms have long helped to sell agricultural products through farmer-assisting marketing activities, effectively alleviating the problem of stagnant agricultural products in some areas, and have become a valuable cause-related marketing strategy. The ethical attributes of farmer-assisting agricultural products have unique value compared with other agricultural products. However, the existing research rarely pays attention to the influence of the ethical attributes of farmer-assisting agricultural products on consumers' willingness to buy farmer-assisting agricultural products online. Based on collective efficacy theory and risk perception theory, this study systematically explores the influence mechanism of ethical attributes (symbolic ethical attribute and functional ethical attribute) on consumers' willingness to buy farmer-assisting agricultural products online through three situational experiments. The results show that compared with functional ethical attributes, symbolic ethical attributes have a more positive impact on consumers' willingness to buy farmer-assisting agricultural products online. In addition, it further reveals two mediating pathways of ethical effects (collective efficacy and risk perception) and boundaries (emergency of farmer-assisting events). This study helps to understand the ethical attributes of farmer-assisting agricultural products, and provides some practical suggestions for e-commerce enterprises implementing farmer-assisting marketing communication activities or marketers developing and promoting farmer-assisting agricultural products.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):245-269 [PMID: 29265852]
  2. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 15;13:903221 [PMID: 35783755]
  3. Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):1-22 [PMID: 17402809]
  4. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 29;17(3):e0266050 [PMID: 35349603]
  5. Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;61(3):882-906 [PMID: 35137969]
  6. Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):52-71 [PMID: 22435846]
  7. Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 01;10:861325 [PMID: 35433605]
  8. Scand J Psychol. 2022 Aug;63(4):357-364 [PMID: 35388491]
  9. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:949121 [PMID: 35814099]
  10. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Sep;26(3):538-550 [PMID: 31916807]
  11. J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;47(2):311-326 [PMID: 30168844]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):316-328 [PMID: 32160568]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0agriculturalproductsfarmer-assistingethicalattributesonlineconsumers'willingnessbuymarketinginfluencecollectiveefficacyriskperceptione-commerceactivitiescomparedtheorystudysymbolicattributefunctionalChineseplatformslonghelpedselleffectivelyalleviatingproblemstagnantareasbecomevaluablecause-relatedstrategyuniquevalueHoweverexistingresearchrarelypaysattentionBasedsystematicallyexploresmechanismthreesituationalexperimentsresultsshowpositiveimpactadditionrevealstwomediatingpathwayseffectsboundariesemergencyeventshelpsunderstandprovidespracticalsuggestionsenterprisesimplementingcommunicationmarketersdevelopingpromotinghelpingrisky:shopping

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.