Comparing meat abstainers with avid meat eaters and committed meat reducers.

Muriel C D Verain, Hans Dagevos
Author Information
  1. Muriel C D Verain: Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  2. Hans Dagevos: Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Abstract

Shifting our eating patterns toward less animal-based and more plant-based diets is urgently needed to counter climate change, address public health issues, and protect animal welfare. Although most consumers agree that these are important topics, many consumers are not particularly willing to decrease the meat intensity of their diets. In supporting consumers to shift their diets, it is important to understand consumers' attitudes, motivations, and preferences related to meat consumption and to take differences across consumers on these aspects into account. This study aims to in-depth research meat abstainers (vegetarians and vegans), and to explore how and to what extent they differ from avid meat eaters and committed meat reducers in terms of their (1) socio-demographic characteristics, (2) attitudes and norms, (3) food choice motives, and (4) food preferences and behavior. A survey has been conducted among a representative sample of Dutch adults. Comparisons show that meat abstainers ( = 198) differ from committed meat reducers ( = 171) and avid meat eaters ( = 344) on the four included categories of variables. In terms of demographics, we largely confirm the stereotype of vegans and vegetarians being highly educated females. In attitudes and norms, large differences exist with meat abstainers being least pro-meat and avid meat eaters being most pro-meat. Food choice motives confirm this, with meat abstainers valuing animal welfare and a good feeling higher than committed meat reducers and avid meat eaters. Finally, differences across the groups are most pronounced in terms of their food preferences and consumption, with a much higher appreciation of plant-based protein sources among meat abstainers, a high appreciation of non-meat animal-based proteins across committed meat reducers and a high appreciation of meat products among avid meat eaters. This shows that although differences across the groups are gradual and expected, in terms of reduction motivations and preferences of protein sources the three groups (frequent meat consumption-meat reduction-meat avoidance) are very distinct, which makes it unlikely to expect big shifts from one group to another in the short term.

Keywords

References

  1. Appetite. 2014 May;76:120-8 [PMID: 24530654]
  2. Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:115-126 [PMID: 30917940]
  3. J Soc Psychol. 2000 Aug;140(4):405-22 [PMID: 10981371]
  4. Appetite. 2021 Feb 1;157:105002 [PMID: 33068668]
  5. Nutr Res Rev. 2020 Dec;33(2):181-189 [PMID: 31918784]
  6. Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):518-22 [PMID: 25383533]
  7. Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105277 [PMID: 33984401]
  8. Appetite. 2014 Jan;72:98-105 [PMID: 24148251]
  9. Appetite. 2019 Sep 1;140:19-26 [PMID: 31059762]
  10. Foods. 2022 Oct 28;11(21): [PMID: 36360026]
  11. Nutrients. 2017 Sep 15;9(9): [PMID: 28926931]
  12. Appetite. 2011 Apr;56(2):447-50 [PMID: 21256169]
  13. Poult Sci. 2009 Dec;88(12):2702-11 [PMID: 19903971]
  14. Appetite. 2001 Aug;37(1):47-56 [PMID: 11562157]
  15. Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105739 [PMID: 34648912]
  16. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 07;12:579700 [PMID: 34690847]
  17. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Dec;15(12):2287-94 [PMID: 22717188]
  18. Appetite. 2022 Mar 1;170:105864 [PMID: 34920050]
  19. Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:113-25 [PMID: 26148456]
  20. Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105246 [PMID: 33819525]
  21. Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:375-84 [PMID: 25913683]
  22. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Feb 05;4(3):nzaa013 [PMID: 32110769]
  23. Appetite. 2022 Mar 1;170:105880 [PMID: 34942285]
  24. Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1663-1674 [PMID: 28961062]
  25. Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:114-28 [PMID: 25865663]
  26. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov 11;112(5):1338-1347 [PMID: 32766880]
  27. Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525 [PMID: 30305731]
  28. Appetite. 2021 Nov 1;166:105475 [PMID: 34166748]
  29. Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105058 [PMID: 33276014]
  30. Appetite. 2021 Nov 1;166:105584 [PMID: 34214640]
  31. Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 21;9:780614 [PMID: 35265655]
  32. Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:230-241 [PMID: 29751024]
  33. Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399): [PMID: 30026199]
  34. Appetite. 1995 Dec;25(3):267-84 [PMID: 8746966]
  35. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Dec 25;14(1):41 [PMID: 28424081]
  36. Appetite. 2019 Oct 1;141:104331 [PMID: 31276710]
  37. Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:251-8 [PMID: 25529819]
  38. Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104636 [PMID: 32097692]
  39. Appetite. 2017 Jul 1;114:299-305 [PMID: 28392424]
  40. Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992 [PMID: 29853680]
  41. Br J Nutr. 2022 Apr 14;127(7):1060-1072 [PMID: 34184978]
  42. Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Jul 01;10(2):147-152 [PMID: 38013920]
  43. Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:387-397 [PMID: 28300608]
  44. Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492 [PMID: 30660336]
  45. Appetite. 2021 Dec 1;167:105614 [PMID: 34329718]
  46. Meat Sci. 2022 Oct;192:108894 [PMID: 35749818]
  47. Appetite. 2015 Jun;89:152-9 [PMID: 25681291]
  48. Ecol Food Nutr. 2014;53(6):639-57 [PMID: 25357269]
  49. Food Res Int. 2021 Nov;149:110652 [PMID: 34600654]
  50. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:578582 [PMID: 33391097]
  51. Appetite. 2001 Apr;36(2):127-36 [PMID: 11237348]
  52. Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1253-63 [PMID: 17868818]
  53. Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:80-90 [PMID: 25747854]
  54. Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 12;9(1):226 [PMID: 31515473]
  55. Meat Sci. 2015 Jan;99:68-74 [PMID: 25282670]
  56. Appetite. 2012 Feb;58(1):141-50 [PMID: 22001025]
  57. Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:233-241 [PMID: 30965045]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0meatabstainerseatersavidreducerscommittedconsumerspreferencesdifferencesacrosstermsdietsattitudesconsumptionvegetariansvegansfoodamong=groupsappreciationanimal-basedplant-basedanimalwelfareimportantmotivationsdiffernormschoicemotivesconfirmpro-meathigherproteinsourceshighShiftingeatingpatternstowardlessurgentlyneededcounterclimatechangeaddresspublichealthissuesprotectAlthoughagreetopicsmanyparticularlywillingdecreaseintensitysupportingshiftunderstandconsumers'relatedtakeaspectsaccountstudyaimsin-depthresearchexploreextent1socio-demographiccharacteristics234behaviorsurveyconductedrepresentativesampleDutchadultsComparisonsshow198171344fourincludedcategoriesvariablesdemographicslargelystereotypehighlyeducatedfemaleslargeexistleastFoodvaluinggoodfeelingFinallypronouncedmuchnon-meatproteinsproductsshowsalthoughgradualexpectedreductionthreefrequentconsumption-meatreduction-meatavoidancedistinctmakesunlikelyexpectbigshiftsonegroupanothershorttermComparingconsumersegmentsflexitarianscurtailment

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)