The compensation incentive effect of athletes: A structural equation model.

Huan Zhao, Zhaoxia Liu, Susu Zhang, Feiyan Xiao, Meng Liu, Ruiyuan Li, Liqing Zhang, Chengcheng Xu
Author Information
  1. Huan Zhao: Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
  2. Zhaoxia Liu: Graduate School, Hunan University, Gwangju Metropolitan City, South Korea.
  3. Susu Zhang: Sports Department, Chengyang Experimental Primary School, Shandong, China.
  4. Feiyan Xiao: Faculty of Physical Education, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
  5. Meng Liu: Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
  6. Ruiyuan Li: Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
  7. Liqing Zhang: Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
  8. Chengcheng Xu: Sports Department, The Branch of the High School Afflicted to Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Abstract

This study explores the compensation incentive effect of athletes. Based on the related literature, we proposed theoretical hypotheses on the compensation incentive effect and established an assessment index system of the compensation incentive effect for athletes. A structural equation model was used to test the survey data of 352 athletes in six provinces to discover the truth of the compensation incentive effect. The results suggested that direct economic compensation satisfaction, direct non-economic compensation satisfaction, and indirect non-economic compensation satisfaction had significant positive effects on the compensation incentive effect of athletes, while indirect economic compensation satisfaction showed no significant effect. Moreover, the evaluation results of athletes' compensation incentive effect showed that direct economic compensation satisfaction contributed the most to the influence factor of the compensation incentive effect. Therefore, the evaluation of athletes' compensation incentive effect should focus on variables of direct economic compensation satisfaction, i.e., basic compensation satisfaction, bonus income satisfaction, and subsidy satisfaction. Finally, some strategies and recommendations were suggested to improve the compensation design for athletes.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 25;13:795660 [PMID: 35282215]
  2. Int J STEM Educ. 2017;4(1):7 [PMID: 30631663]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 02;16(7): [PMID: 30986910]
  4. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 29;12:648729 [PMID: 33995206]
  5. Front Psychol. 2022 May 10;13:856997 [PMID: 35619787]
  6. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 08;13:912608 [PMID: 35898981]
  7. Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5 Suppl 1):S17-28 [PMID: 22502923]