Precarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability.

Irene Bloemraad, Cecilia Menj��var
Author Information
  1. Irene Bloemraad: University of California, Berkeley. ORCID
  2. Cecilia Menj��var: University of California, Los Angeles. ORCID

Abstract

How should migration scholars navigate tensions between our ethical responsibilities to research participants and growing "open science" calls for data transparency, replication, and accountability? We elaborate a three-step process to navigate these tensions. First, researchers must understand core behind open-science initiatives and the mandates of research ethics boards, especially those related to privacy, confidentiality, and protection from harm, and take them seriously. Second, migration researchers must think beyond routinized or mandated procedures to carefully consider the unique of migrants in their study, which depend on socio-political context. Third, if vulnerabilities are significant, migration researchers should modify (or challenge) elaborated in the name of open science or routinized research ethic board mandates, if inappropriate for their study. We, thus, encourage migration scholars to engage with open-science advocates but also to educate colleagues on migrants' vulnerabilities and to double-down on data security, including vis-��-vis government authorities, as evolving technologies continue to change research practices.

Keywords

References

  1. J Urban Health. 2013 Dec;90(6):1026-40 [PMID: 23793556]
  2. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122 [PMID: 28841086]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:49-55 [PMID: 30391641]
  4. Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):220-4 [PMID: 27124458]
  5. Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Nov;25(7):768-92 [PMID: 19780205]
  6. Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):229-244 [PMID: 30741570]
  7. Am Sociol. 1981 Nov;16(4):224-9 [PMID: 11658273]
  8. Soc Forces. 2011 Jun 4;89(4):1097-1117 [PMID: 22500057]
  9. Violence Against Women. 2011 Dec;17(12):1536-48; discussion 1549-58 [PMID: 22410769]
  10. Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3069 [PMID: 31337762]
  11. J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):594-609 [PMID: 26479569]
  12. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:371-8 [PMID: 23312301]
  13. Soc Probl. 2022 Aug;69(3):678-698 [PMID: 37649781]
  14. J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13 [PMID: 25951677]
  15. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):615-31 [PMID: 26168121]

Grants

  1. P2C HD041022/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchmigrationresearchersscholarsnavigatetensionsdatamustopen-sciencemandatesethicsroutinizedstudyvulnerabilitiesopenscienceethicalresponsibilitiesparticipantsgrowing"openscience"callstransparencyreplicationaccountability?elaboratethree-stepprocessFirstunderstandcorebehindinitiativesboardsespeciallyrelatedprivacyconfidentialityprotectionharmtakeseriouslySecondthinkbeyondmandatedprocedurescarefullyconsideruniquemigrantsdependsocio-politicalcontextThirdsignificantmodifychallengeelaboratednameethicboardinappropriatethusencourageengageadvocatesalsoeducatecolleaguesmigrants'double-downsecurityincludingvis-��-visgovernmentauthoritiesevolvingtechnologiescontinuechangepracticesPrecariousTimesProfessionalTensions:EthicsMigrationResearchDriveScientificAccountabilityvulnerability

Similar Articles

Cited By