Parasitism Shifts the Effects of Native Soil Microbes on the Growth of the Invasive Plant .

Chaonan Cai, Yingying Zhao, Yongge Yuan, Junmin Li
Author Information
  1. Chaonan Cai: School of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China.
  2. Yingying Zhao: College of Life Sciences, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China.
  3. Yongge Yuan: School of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China.
  4. Junmin Li: School of Advanced Study, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China. ORCID

Abstract

Soil microbes play an important role in plant invasion, and parasitic plants regulate the growth of invasive plants. However, the mechanisms by which parasitic plants regulate the effects of soil microbes on invasive plants have not been investigated. Here, we used the invasive plant and the holoparasitic plant to test whether and how parasitism shifts the effect of native soil microbes on the growth of . In a factorial setup, was grown in pots with the presence versus absence of parasitism and the presence versus absence of native soil microbes. The findings showed that native soil microbes increased the biomass and clonal growth of only in the absence of a parasite, whereas parasitism decreased the biomass and clonal growth of only in the presence of soil microbes. In addition, the presence of soil microbes increased the deleterious effects of the parasite on . These results indicate that parasitism can shift the effects of native soil microbes on the growth of the invasive plant . Our results enrich the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the success of plant invasion.

Keywords

References

  1. Microb Ecol. 2020 Nov;80(4):837-845 [PMID: 32561944]
  2. Phytopathology. 1997 Dec;87(12):1240-2 [PMID: 18945024]
  3. Microb Ecol. 2020 Apr;79(3):617-630 [PMID: 31598761]
  4. PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e140 [PMID: 16623597]
  5. New Phytol. 2005 Jun;166(3):737-51 [PMID: 15869638]
  6. New Phytol. 2022 Nov;236(3):1140-1153 [PMID: 35637602]
  7. New Phytol. 2011 Oct;192(1):215-224 [PMID: 21658184]
  8. New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(1):585-592 [PMID: 32846015]
  9. Oecologia. 2002 May;131(4):479-489 [PMID: 28547541]
  10. Ecology. 2009 Feb;90(2):399-407 [PMID: 19323224]
  11. Science. 1969 Nov 7;166(3906):699-709 [PMID: 17776752]
  12. Science. 2003 Sep 5;301(5638):1377-80 [PMID: 12958360]
  13. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34577 [PMID: 22493703]
  14. J Exp Bot. 2001 Mar;52(Spec Issue):487-511 [PMID: 11326055]
  15. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):3363-3370 [PMID: 27888560]
  16. New Phytol. 2006;170(3):445-57 [PMID: 16626467]
  17. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 20;22(24): [PMID: 34948474]
  18. Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 04;4:6895 [PMID: 25367357]
  19. Am Nat. 2007 Apr;169(4):443-54 [PMID: 17253430]
  20. Ecology. 2008 Apr;89(4):1043-55 [PMID: 18481529]
  21. Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul 04;9(15):8652-8663 [PMID: 31410269]
  22. AoB Plants. 2020 Jan 11;12(1):plaa002 [PMID: 32071712]
  23. Ecol Lett. 2019 Jan;22(1):200-210 [PMID: 30460738]
  24. Nature. 2006 Feb 23;439(7079):969-72 [PMID: 16495998]
  25. Ecology. 2019 Nov;100(11):e02830 [PMID: 31323119]
  26. Ecol Lett. 2011 Jul;14(7):702-8 [PMID: 21592274]

Grants

  1. 32271590/National Natural Science Foundation of China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0microbessoilplantgrowthparasitismplantsinvasivenativepresenceinvasioneffectsabsenceSoilparasiticregulatemechanismsversusincreasedbiomassclonalparasiteresultsplayimportantroleHoweverinvestigatedusedholoparasitictestwhethershiftseffectfactorialsetupgrownpotsfindingsshowedwhereasdecreasedadditiondeleteriousindicatecanshiftenrichunderstandingunderlyingsuccessParasitismShiftsEffectsNativeMicrobesGrowthInvasivePlantAlternantheraphiloxeroidesCuscutagrovoniibiological

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.