Factors associated with hospital choice of Chinese patients: A meta-analysis.

Xiaoming Che, Weidong Chen, Xuehua Wu, Pengcheng Lin
Author Information
  1. Xiaoming Che: College of Management and Economy, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
  2. Weidong Chen: College of Management and Economy, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. ORCID
  3. Xuehua Wu: Department of Pharmacy, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.
  4. Pengcheng Lin: College of pharmacy, Qinghai Nationalities University, Xining, China.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While China continues to optimize the tiered medical care system, the status quo of patients preferring higher-tier hospitals has not improved. Herein, we aimed to analyze the factors influencing patients' healthcare choices in China and to provide an evidentiary basis for optimizing the tiered healthcare system.
PATIENT CONCERNS: Most patients are concerned that primary care services will not provide appropriate treatment or health advice. Also, patients consider medical technology, cost, experience, quality of service and convenience before seeking care.
OUTCOMES: A total of 18 cross-sectional studies involving 10,348 samples were included. After combining the effect size, the factors affecting the choice of Chinese patients for medical treatment were medical technology and quality (49%), the convenience of medical treatment (37%), medical expenses (23%), hospital service quality (20%) medical insurance policy (16%), and acquaintance relationship (11%).
CONCLUSION: The selection of medical treatment for Chinese residents is primarily influenced by medical technology and convenience. The medical insurance policy does not provide sufficient guidance. Furthermore, the tiered medical care system should be optimized to improve the usability of primary care services.

References

  1. Wenjie S, Shuai C, Tianmin Z, et al. Analysis of Chinese patients’ medical preference and influencing factors based on bibliometrics. Chin Med Sci. 2021;11:160–3.
  2. Min W, Kaijin Z, Li J, et al. A model study on the influencing factors of medical treatment behavior of Chinese urban and rural patients. Chin Gen Pract. 2010;13:2127–9.
  3. Chunyu Z, Tianqing L. Analysis of influencing factors of patients’ seeking medical behavior in large general hospitals. Health Econ Res. 2009:32–3.
  4. China GOotSCotPsRo. National medical and health service system planning outline (2015-2020). Chin J Pract Rural Doctors. 2015;22:1–11.
  5. Tokuda N, Naito S, Matsuzaki O, et al. Collecting duct (Bellini duct) renal cell carcinoma: a nationwide survey in Japan. J Urol. 2006;176:40–3. discussion 43.
  6. Mengjie S, Hua H. A study on the choice of Chinese rural residents’ visiting clinic: an empirical analysis from a survey of farmers in Gansu, Henan, and Guangdong. Econ Rev. 2013;2:40–50.
  7. Yu X, Kun Z. Study on the willingness and influencing factors of first visit of community residents in Nanjing. Chin Gen Med. 2010;13:16211624.
  8. Huan H. Study on Medical-seeking behavior of Community residents. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University. 2010.
  9. Ting W, Changhui Z. Investigation of medical treatment-seeking behavior of residents in Chengdu and suggestions on medical service Modern Preventive Medicine. 2010;37:856, 858.
  10. Ls YJ, Yonghua L. Analysis of the causes of Chengdu citizens’ first choice to see a hospital for illness. China Health Qual Manag. 2011;18:93, 95.
  11. Hui L, Haiqing Z. Investigation and analysis of the causes of the first visit of peasant patients in four district and county hospitals in Beijing. Chin Gen Med. 2011;14:2201 mi 2204.
  12. Lijuan L. Research on institutions and influencing factors of Tianjin residents’ first visits. Chin Hosp Manag. 2011;31:12–3.
  13. Zebing X, Xiaoling Z. Analysis of influencing factors of first treatment behavior of rural residents in Lushan County. JII. 2011;5:448,452.
  14. Ruijie Z. Study on influencing factors of medical treatment-seeking behavior of urban community residents in Kunming Kunming: Yunnan University. 2015.
  15. Li L, Jinhao L. Investigation on influencing factors of residents’ intention to seek medical treatment and utilization of community health services in Guangzhou. Chin Gen Med. 2015:100104.
  16. Shuxian X, Zhiqiang C. Analysis of factors affecting the choice of patients in Guangzhou. Chin Med Manag Sci. 2016;6:41–5.
  17. Xiaolin K. Analysis on the selection behavior of medical institutions and its influencing factors among residents in Wuhan. Wuhan: central China normal University. 2016.
  18. Zhanqi D, Yan R. Investigation and countermeasure analysis of medical treatment-seeking behavior of urban patients in Sichuan, Province. Health Qual Manag China. 2016:117.
  19. Xiaoli L, Wen C. Investigation and countermeasure analysis of medical-seeking behavior of rural residents in Sichuan Province. Health Soft Sci. 2016:30–3.
  20. Yong G, Wenzhen L, Shiyi C, et al. Patients’ willingness on community health centers as gatekeepers and associated factors in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltim). 2016;95:e3261.
  21. Yingying X. Study on influencing factors and countermeasures of outpatient medical choice among residents in Jiangsu Province. Chin J Drug Eval. 2019;06:411–5.
  22. Yuan S, Mingshu S, Shixue L. Study on the selection and influencing factors of the first consultation of residents in Ningxia. Health Econ Res. 2020;37:35–9.
  23. Yu Z, Tiantian Z, Yubo Y, et al. Survey of urban residents’ medical intentions under the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system and analysis of influencing factors. Mod Hosp Manag. 2020;18:16–9.
  24. Cuiping Z, Linlin Y, Jie X, et al. Analysis of residents’ choices for first visits and influencing factors under the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system: taking Weifang City as an example. China Med Insurance. 2020:57–63.
  25. Cheng J, Jianquan C, Yuqi L, et al. Spatial inequity in access to healthcare facilities at a county level in a developing country: a case study of Deqing County, Zhejiang, China. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:67.
  26. Zhou Z, Su Y, Gao J, et al. Assessing equity of healthcare utilization in rural China: results from nationally representative surveys from 1993 to 2008. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:34.
  27. Xiaobo Z, Ravi K. Spatial inequality in education and health care in China. China Econ Rev. 2005;16:189–204.
  28. Shengkang L, Chunhong J, Yuanrong H, et al. Analysis of factors influencing Wuhan residents’ choice of medical institutions. Med Soc. 2019;32:50–52 + 57.
  29. Yan L, Dongfu Q. The choice and influencing factors of patients with chronic diseases under the background of medical reform. Guangxi Med Sci. 2017;39:234–7.
  30. Xiaoling H, Fan Z, Ling W, et al. The choice and influencing factors of medical treatment of rural residents in Hainan Province. Chin Health Serv Manag. 2016;33:204–7.
  31. Rao C, Xudong D, Zhan Y, et al. Analysis of medical choice and influencing factors of outpatients in Chengdu city. Mod Prev Med. 2016;43:4217–20.
  32. Min W, Jincheng X. Analysis of the influencing factors and countermeasures of patients’ choice for medical treatment. Chin Health Serv Manag. 2014;31:259–61.
  33. Jun Z, Ju S, Xiaoqian W. Analysis of influencing factors in the choice of residential medical institutions. Stat Decis. 2019;35:108–11.
  34. China Mofotpsro. National General Public Budget Expenditure 2016. 2016. Available at: http://yss.mof.gov.cn/2016czys/201603/t20160325_1924496.html [Access date March 24, 2017].
  35. Huanye, Xiaofeng H, Gaoshan Y. Analysis of factors affecting medical and health services of the public. Chin Contemp Med. 2013;20:151–2.

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
East Asian People
Hospitals
Delivery of Health Care
China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0medicalcarepatientstreatmenttieredsystemprovidetechnologyqualityconvenienceChineseChinafactorshealthcareprimaryservicesservicechoicehospitalinsurancepolicyINTRODUCTION:continuesoptimizestatusquopreferringhigher-tierhospitalsimprovedHereinaimedanalyzeinfluencingpatients'choicesevidentiarybasisoptimizingPATIENTCONCERNS:concernedwillappropriatehealthadviceAlsoconsidercostexperienceseekingOUTCOMES:total18cross-sectionalstudiesinvolving10348samplesincludedcombiningeffectsizeaffecting49%37%expenses23%20%16%acquaintancerelationship11%CONCLUSION:selectionresidentsprimarilyinfluencedsufficientguidanceFurthermoreoptimizedimproveusabilityFactorsassociatedpatients:meta-analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)