Perceived and calculated diet quality improvements in a randomized mHealth weight loss trial.

Jessica Cheng, Tina Costacou, Bonny Rockette-Wagner, Susan M Sereika, Molly B Conroy, Andrea M Kriska, Jacob K Kariuki, Mary Lou Klem, Bambang Parmanto, Lora E Burke
Author Information
  1. Jessica Cheng: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  2. Tina Costacou: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  3. Bonny Rockette-Wagner: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  4. Susan M Sereika: Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  5. Molly B Conroy: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. ORCID
  6. Andrea M Kriska: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  7. Jacob K Kariuki: Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  8. Mary Lou Klem: Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  9. Bambang Parmanto: Department of Health Information Management, School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID
  10. Lora E Burke: Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

The diet quality of US adults is poor and cross-sectional analyses suggest self-perception of healthful dietary intake may be overestimated. This analysis assessed the concordance between calculated and perceived diet quality and changes in diet quality among adults seeking weight loss and enrolled in a 12-month randomized behavioral trial. Healthy Eating Index-2015 diet quality (HEI) was calculated from self-administered 24-hour recalls. Perceived diet quality (PDQ) was measured on a 100-point scale. Higher scores indicate better diet quality. Concordance was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. The one hundred and five participants with complete dietary data were mostly female and white. There was good agreement between HEI and PDQ scores at 12 months for less than a third of participants. Most of the disagreement arose from PDQ scores being higher than HEI scores. Even fewer participants had good agreement between HEI changes and PDQ changes. Participants perceived greater improvement in diet quality than indicated by HEI score changes. Concordance was low at 12 months and for change in diet quality. Despite the diet quality of adults seeking weight loss being suboptimal and not improving, many perceived their diet quality and diet quality improvements as better than calculated. Future studies might explore the effect of misperceptions on weight loss outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1622-1633 [PMID: 30146073]
  2. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602 [PMID: 30146071]
  3. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Dec;17(12):2641-9 [PMID: 24636343]
  4. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Feb;116(2):302-310.e1 [PMID: 26612769]
  5. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Jan;30(1):75-84 [PMID: 34898011]
  6. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1603-1621 [PMID: 30146072]
  7. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 5;24(7):e38243 [PMID: 35787516]
  8. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 05;25(2):141-51 [PMID: 26110027]
  9. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):563-575 [PMID: 34246527]
  10. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105958 [PMID: 32087342]
  11. J Nutr. 2014 Mar;144(3):399-407 [PMID: 24453128]
  12. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 [PMID: 2868172]
  13. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jul;88(1):185-94 [PMID: 18614740]
  14. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Aug;25(8):1442-1450 [PMID: 28745024]
  15. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Sep;20(9):1820-8 [PMID: 21527896]
  16. J Nutr Educ. 2001 Nov-Dec;33(6):314-21 [PMID: 12031169]
  17. Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):778-80 [PMID: 17907247]
  18. Nutrients. 2018 Apr 05;10(4): [PMID: 29621192]
  19. Nutrients. 2019 Sep 02;11(9): [PMID: 31480746]
  20. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Aug;25(8):2559-2568 [PMID: 28417203]
  21. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Mar;109(3):293-304 [PMID: 23031487]
  22. Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68 [PMID: 2720055]

Grants

  1. F31 HL156278/NHLBI NIH HHS
  2. R01 HL131583/NHLBI NIH HHS
  3. T32 HL098048/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet
Eating
Quality Improvement
Weight Loss

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dietqualityweightlossHEIcalculatedchangesPDQscoresadultsperceivedparticipantsdietaryassessedconcordanceseekingrandomizedtrialPerceivedbetterConcordancegoodagreement12 monthsimprovementsUSpoorcross-sectionalanalysessuggestself-perceptionhealthfulintakemayoverestimatedanalysisamongenrolled12-monthbehavioralHealthyEatingIndex-2015self-administered24-hourrecallsmeasured100-pointscaleHigherindicateusingcorrelationcoefficientBland-AltmanplotsonehundredfivecompletedatamostlyfemalewhitelessthirddisagreementarosehigherEvenfewerParticipantsgreaterimprovementindicatedscorelowchangeDespitesuboptimalimprovingmanyFuturestudiesmightexploreeffectmisperceptionsoutcomesmHealthnutritionperception

Similar Articles

Cited By