A translational evaluation of component skills for the establishment of multiply controlled intraverbals.

Adrienne M Jennings, Jason C Vladescu, Caio F Miguel, Kenneth F Reeve, Tina M Sidener
Author Information
  1. Adrienne M Jennings: Department of Applied Behavior Analysis, Caldwell University, Caldwell, NJ, United States. ORCID
  2. Jason C Vladescu: Department of Applied Behavior Analysis, Caldwell University, Caldwell, NJ, United States. ORCID
  3. Caio F Miguel: Department of Psychology, California State University, Sacramento, United States. ORCID
  4. Kenneth F Reeve: Department of Applied Behavior Analysis, Caldwell University, Caldwell, NJ, United States. ORCID
  5. Tina M Sidener: Department of Applied Behavior Analysis, Caldwell University, Caldwell, NJ, United States. ORCID

Abstract

Intraverbal behavior is a type of verbal behavior in which the response form has no point-to-point correspondence with its verbal stimulus. However, the form and occurrence of most intraverbals is under the control of multiple variables. Establishing this form of multiple control may depend on a variety of preestablished skills. The purpose of Experiment 1 was to evaluate these potential prerequisites with adult participants using a multiple probe design. The results suggest that training was not required for each putative prerequisite. In Experiment 2, probes for all skills were conducted following convergent intraverbal probes. The results showed that convergent intraverbals only emerged when proficiency of each skill was demonstrated. Finally, Experiment 3 evaluated alternating training of multiple tact and intraverbal categorization. The results showed that this procedure was effective for half of the participants.

Keywords

References

  1. Axe, J. B. (2008). Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: A review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393064
  2. Braam, S. J., & Poling, A. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: Classification of verbal responses. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4(4), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-3092(83)90030-9
  3. Coon, J. T., & Miguel, C. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus-control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-657
  4. DeSouza, A. A., Fisher, W. W., & Rodriguez, N. M. (2019). Facilitating the emergence of convergent intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 28-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.520
  5. Dube, W. V., Ahearn, W. H., Lionello-DeNolf, K., & McIlvane, W. J. (2009). Behavioral momentum: Translational research in intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Behavior Analyst Today, 10(2), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100668
  6. Goldsmith, T. R., LeBlanc, L. A., & Sautter, R. A. (2007). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.07.001
  7. Grannan, L., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). Emergent intraverbal responses via tact and match-to-sample instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(3), 601-605. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-601
  8. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185-241. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185
  9. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
  10. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2011). A comparison of prompting tactics to establish intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(3), 659-664. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-659
  11. Ingvarsson, E. T., Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Stephenson, K. M. (2007). An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(3), 411-429. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.40-411
  12. Jennings, A. M., Vladescu, J. C., Miguel, C. F., Reeve, K. F., & Sidener, T. M. (2021). A systematic review of empirical intraverbal research: 2015-2020. Behavioral Interventions, 37(1), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1815
  13. Kisamore, A. N., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2011). Training preschool children to use visual imagining as a problem-solving strategy for complex categorization tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(2), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-255
  14. Kodak, T., Fuchtman, R., & Paden, A. R. (2012). A comparison of intraverbal training procedures for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(1), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-155
  15. LaFrance, D. L., & Tarbox, J. (2020). The importance of multiple exemplar instruction in the establishment of novel verbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(1), 10-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.611
  16. Lee, G. T., Chou, W. C., & Feng, H. (2017). Using intraverbal prompts to increase divergent intraverbal responses by a child with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 32(4), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1496
  17. Lerman, D. C. (2003). From the laboratory to community application: Translational research in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(4), 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-415
  18. Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 86(6), 1236-1254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.6.1236
  19. Ma, M. L., Miguel, C. F., & Jennings, A. M. (2016). Training intraverbal naming to establish equivalence class performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.203
  20. Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: Historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93(3), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-293
  21. Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393089
  22. Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2
  23. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393008
  24. Palmer, D. C. (1998). The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392920
  25. Palmer, D. C. (2016). On intraverbal control and the definition of the intraverbal. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0061-7
  26. Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392883
  27. Pérez-González, L. A., & Alonso-Álvarez, B. (2008). Common control by compound samples in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008.90-81
  28. Petursdottir, A. I., Cox, R. E., McKeon, C. A., & Mellor, J. R. (2019). Baseline training sequence affects speed of emergent conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.539
  29. Poon, W., & Butler, K. G. (1972). Evaluation of intraverbal responses in five- to seven-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15(2), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1502.303
  30. Ribeiro, D. M., & Miguel, C. F. (2020). Using multiple-tact training to produce emergent visual categorization in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1768-1779. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.687
  31. Rodriguez, N. M., Aragon, M. A., McKeown, C. A., & Glodowski, K. R. (2022). Facilitating the emergence of intraverbal tacts in children with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(2), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.898
  32. Shillingsburg, M. A., & Frampton, S. E. (2019). The effects of the interspersal of related responses on the emergence of intraverbals for children with autism spectrum disorder. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(2), 172-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00110-4
  33. Shillingsburg, M. A., Frampton, S. E., Cleveland, S. A., & Cariveau, T. (2018). Clinical applications of procedures to promote the emergence of untrained intraverbal relations with children with autism. Learning and Motivation, 62, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2017.02.003
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  36. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393090
  37. Thakore, A., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2022). Acquisition and generalization of divergent intraverbal responses in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Interventions, 37(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1796
  38. Tiger, J., & Reed, D. (2015). Translational and applied choice research. In F. DiGennaro Reed & D. Reed (Eds.), Autism service delivery. Autism and child psychopathology series (pp. 193-208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2656-5_7
  39. Vollmer, T. R. (2011). Three variations of translational research: Comments on Critchfield (2011). The Behavior Analyst, 34(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392231

MeSH Term

Adult
Humans
Verbal Behavior
Tellurium

Chemicals

Tellurium

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0multiplebehaviorverbalformintraverbalscontrolskillsExperimentresultsconvergentintraverbalparticipantstrainingprobesshowedIntraverbaltyperesponsepoint-to-pointcorrespondencestimulusHoweveroccurrencevariablesEstablishingmaydependvarietypreestablishedpurpose1evaluatepotentialprerequisitesadultusingprobedesignsuggestrequiredputativeprerequisite2conductedfollowingemergedproficiencyskilldemonstratedFinally3evaluatedalternatingtactcategorizationprocedureeffectivehalftranslationalevaluationcomponentestablishmentmultiplycontrolled

Similar Articles

Cited By