Exploring the Longitudinal Stability of Food Neophilia and Dietary Quality and Their Prospective Relationship in Older Adults: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.

Hanna R Wortmann, Ulrike A Gisch, Manuela M Bergmann, Petra Warschburger
Author Information
  1. Hanna R Wortmann: NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research, Berlin-Potsdam, Germany.
  2. Ulrike A Gisch: NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research, Berlin-Potsdam, Germany.
  3. Manuela M Bergmann: NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research, Berlin-Potsdam, Germany.
  4. Petra Warschburger: NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research, Berlin-Potsdam, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

Poor dietary quality is a major cause of morbidity, making the promotion of healthy eating a societal priority. Older adults are a critical target group for promoting healthy eating to enable healthy aging. One factor suggested to promote healthy eating is the willingness to try unfamiliar foods, referred to as food neophilia. This two-wave longitudinal study explored the stability of food neophilia and dietary quality and their prospective relationship over three years, analyzing self-reported data from = 960 older adults ( = 63.4, range = 50-84) participating in the NutriAct Family Study (NFS) in a cross-lagged panel design. Dietary quality was rated using the NutriAct diet score, based on the current evidence for chronic disease prevention. Food neophilia was measured using the Variety Seeking Tendency Scale. The analyses revealed high a longitudinal stability of both constructs and a small positive cross-sectional correlation between them. Food neophilia had no prospective effect on dietary quality, whereas a very small positive prospective effect of dietary quality on food neophilia was found. Our findings give initial insights into the positive relation of food neophilia and a health-promoting diet in aging and underscore the need for more in-depth research, e.g., on the constructs' developmental trajectories and potential critical windows of opportunity for promoting food neophilia.

Keywords

References

  1. Appetite. 2008 Mar-May;50(2-3):181-93 [PMID: 17997196]
  2. Br J Nutr. 2013 May;109(9):1557-72 [PMID: 23445540]
  3. Circulation. 2016 Jan 12;133(2):187-225 [PMID: 26746178]
  4. Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):38-47 [PMID: 32515200]
  5. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;67(3):141-204 [PMID: 26414007]
  6. Nutr Diet. 2020 Feb;77(1):112-120 [PMID: 31602753]
  7. Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1196-208 [PMID: 19801098]
  8. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Feb;113(2):297-306 [PMID: 23168270]
  9. Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77 [PMID: 12090408]
  10. Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:141-154 [PMID: 28235616]
  11. Nutrients. 2022 Jun 06;14(11): [PMID: 35684159]
  12. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e019033 [PMID: 29478018]
  13. Nutr Diet. 2020 Nov;77(5):542-549 [PMID: 31680416]
  14. Nutrients. 2020 Jun 15;12(6): [PMID: 32549267]
  15. J Nutr. 2007 Dec;137(12):2781-6 [PMID: 18029499]
  16. Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:410-422 [PMID: 28533158]
  17. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2161-71 [PMID: 25529274]
  18. Appetite. 2022 Feb 1;169:105859 [PMID: 34910985]
  19. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 26;13(1):111 [PMID: 27782841]
  20. Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):29-45 [PMID: 20053004]
  21. Eat Behav. 2020 Aug;38:101405 [PMID: 32599465]
  22. Br J Nutr. 2015 May 28;113(10):1603-14 [PMID: 25866161]
  23. Appetite. 2012 Jun;58(3):1106-8 [PMID: 22369957]
  24. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538 [PMID: 33686204]
  25. Nutr J. 2019 Nov 7;18(1):67 [PMID: 31699092]
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jan;59(1):56-62 [PMID: 15598728]
  27. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0171077 [PMID: 28152005]
  28. Br J Nutr. 2014 Nov 14;112(9):1562-74 [PMID: 25242619]
  29. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Nov;73(11):1480-1491 [PMID: 30647440]
  30. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;74(8):1117-1121 [PMID: 32313188]
  31. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60 [PMID: 23245609]
  32. J Nutr. 2013 Apr;143(4):493-9 [PMID: 23365105]
  33. J Nutr Elder. 2008;27(3-4):333-61 [PMID: 19042579]
  34. BMC Med. 2014 Apr 08;12:60 [PMID: 24712557]
  35. Public Health Nutr. 2008 May;11(5):493-500 [PMID: 17686201]
  36. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Mar;3(3):e132-42 [PMID: 25701991]
  37. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;110(1):233-245 [PMID: 31161197]
  38. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Dec;17(12):2674-86 [PMID: 24564930]
  39. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Mar;68(3):324-9 [PMID: 24398637]
  40. J Nutr. 2007 Mar;137(3):647-51 [PMID: 17311954]
  41. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 04;9:211-7 [PMID: 27217764]
  42. BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2392 [PMID: 29899124]
  43. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):5-14 [PMID: 11392865]
  44. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21): [PMID: 34769648]
  45. Appetite. 1992 Oct;19(2):105-20 [PMID: 1489209]
  46. Geriatr Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):428-33 [PMID: 25085716]
  47. BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):963 [PMID: 30075718]
  48. Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb 15;175(4):340-7 [PMID: 22273536]
  49. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Mar;55(2):423-450 [PMID: 26695408]
  50. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  51. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2019;28(1):139-149 [PMID: 30896425]
  52. Nutr Rev. 2020 Dec 1;78(12):969-988 [PMID: 32417906]
  53. J Nutr. 2015 Mar;145(3):564-71 [PMID: 25733473]

Grants

  1. 01EA1806B/Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  2. 491466077/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Longitudinal Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet
Food
Diet, Healthy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0neophiliaqualityfooddietaryhealthyeatingprospective=NutriActFoodpositiveOlderadultscriticalpromotingaginglongitudinalstabilityFamilyStudycross-laggedpanelDietaryusingdietsmalleffectPoormajorcausemorbiditymakingpromotionsocietalprioritytargetgroupenableOnefactorsuggestedpromotewillingnesstryunfamiliarfoodsreferredtwo-wavestudyexploredrelationshipthreeyearsanalyzingself-reporteddata960older634range50-84participatingNFSdesignratedscorebasedcurrentevidencechronicdiseasepreventionmeasuredVarietySeekingTendencyScaleanalysesrevealedhighconstructscross-sectionalcorrelationwhereasfoundfindingsgiveinitialinsightsrelationhealth-promotingunderscoreneedin-depthresearchegconstructs'developmentaltrajectoriespotentialwindowsopportunityExploringLongitudinalStabilityNeophiliaQualityProspectiveRelationshipAdults:Cross-LaggedPanelAnalysisanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By