The driving factors of corporate carbon emissions: an application of the LASSO model with survey data.

Mengyao Xia, Helen Huifen Cai
Author Information
  1. Mengyao Xia: School of Management Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu Province, China. xiamengyao@163.com.
  2. Helen Huifen Cai: Business School, Middlesex University London, London, NW4 2BT, UK.

Abstract

Corporate carbon performance is a key driver of achieving corporate sustainability. The identification of factors that influence corporate carbon emissions is fundamental to promoting carbon performance. Based on the carbon disclosure project (CDP) database, we integrate the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model and the fixed effects model to identify the determinants of carbon emissions. Furthermore, we rank determining factors according to their importance. We find that Capx enters the models under all carbon contexts. For Scope 1 and Scope 2, financial-level factors play a greater role. For Scope 3, corporate internal incentive policies and emission reduction behaviors are important. Different from absolute carbon emissions, for relative carbon emissions, the financial-level factors' debt-paying ability is a vital reference indicator for the impact of corporate carbon emissions.

Keywords

References

  1. Amran A, Ooi SK, Wong CY, Hashim F (2016) Business strategy for climate change: an ASEAN perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(4):213–227
  2. Azizalrahman H, Hasyimi V (2019) A model for urban sector drivers of carbon emissions. Sustain Cities Soc 44:46–55
  3. Blanco CC, Caro F, Corbett CJ (2020) Do carbon abatement opportunities become less profitable over time? A global firm-level perspective using CDP data. Energy Policy 138:111252
  4. Bolton P, Halem Z, Kacperczyk M (2022) The financial cost of carbon. J Appl Corp Financ 34(2):17–29
  5. Chen Y, Sun Y, Wang C (2018) Influencing factors of companies’ behavior for mitigation: a discussion within the context of emission trading scheme. Sustainability 10(2):414
  6. Chen Y, Xu Z, Zhang Z, Ye W, Yang Y, Gong Z (2022) Does the carbon emission trading scheme boost corporate environmental and financial performance in China? J Clean Prod, 133151
  7. Córdova C, Zorio-Grima A, Merello P (2018) Carbon emissions by South American companies: driving factors for reporting decisions and emissions reduction. Sustainability 10(7):2411
  8. Dahlmann F, Branicki L, Brammer S (2019) Managing carbon aspirations: the influence of corporate climate change targets on environmental performance. J Bus Ethics 158(1):1–24
  9. de Burgos Jimenez J, Lorente JJC (2001) Environmental performance as an operations objective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(12):1553–1572
  10. Dixon-Fowler HR, Slater DJ, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE, Romi AM (2013) Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J Bus Ethics 112(2):353–366
  11. Druckman A, Jackson T (2016) Understanding households as drivers of carbon emissions. In Taking stock of industrial ecology (pp. 181–203). Springer, Cham
  12. Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Li SX, Serafeim G (2012) Pay for environmental performance: the effect of incentive provision on carbon emissions. Harvard Business School working paper, 13–43
  13. Elsayih J, Datt R, Hamid A (2020) CEO characteristics: do they matter for carbon performance? An empirical investigation of Australian firms. Social Responsibility Journal. Forthcoming
  14. Esty DC, Porter ME (1998) Industrial ecology and competitiveness: Strategic implications for the firm. J Ind Ecol 2(1):35-43
  15. Galletta S, Mazzù S, Naciti V (2021) Banks’ business strategy and environmental effectiveness: the monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives. Bus Strateg Environ 30(5):2656–2670
  16. Ganda F, Milondzo KS (2018) The impact of carbon emissions on corporate financial performance: evidence from the South African firms. Sustainability 10(7):2398
  17. Guenther EM, Hoppe H (2014) Merging limited perspectives: a synopsis of measurement approaches and theories of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. J Ind Ecol 18(5):689–707
  18. Hart SL (1997) Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harv Bus Rev 75(1):66–77
  19. Hossain A, Saadi S, Amin AS (2022) Does CEO risk-aversion affect carbon emission?. Journal of Business Ethics. Forthcoming
  20. Hossain M, Farooque O (2019) The emission trading system, risk management committee and voluntary corporate response to climate change–a CDP study. Int J Account Inf Manag 27(2):262–283
  21. Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Portney PR, Stavins RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Lit, 33(1), 132–163
  22. Jiang Y, Luo T, Wu Z, Xue X (2021) The driving factors in the corporate proactivity of carbon emissions abatement: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 288:125549
  23. Jung J, Herbohn K, Clarkson P (2018) Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. J Bus Ethics 150(4):1151–1171
  24. Karasoy A (2019) Drivers of carbon emissions in Turkey: considering asymmetric impacts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):9219–9231
  25. Karim AE, Albitar K, Elmarzouky M (2021) A novel measure of corporate carbon emission disclosure, the effect of capital expenditures and corporate governance. J Environ Manage 290:112581
  26. Kim HS, Koo WW (2010) Factors affecting the carbon allowance market in the US. Energy Policy 38(4):1879–1884
  27. Koçak E, Ulucak ZŞ (2019) The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(14):14328–14338
  28. Kurnia P, Darlis E, PUTR AA (2020) Carbon emission disclosure, good corporate governance, financial performance, and firm value. J Asian Fin Econ Business, 7(12), 223-231
  29. Lamb WF, Steinberger JK, Bows-Larkin A, Peters GP, Roberts JT, Wood FR (2014) Transitions in pathways of human development and carbon emissions. Environ Res Lett 9(1):014011
  30. Larasati R, Seralurin YC, Sesa PVS (2020) Effect of profitability on carbon emission disclosure. The Intl J Social Sci World (TIJOSSW) 2(2):182–195
  31. Lee KH, Min B, Yook KH (2015) The impacts of carbon (CO) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 167:1–11
  32. Lee SY (2012) Corporate carbon strategies in responding to climate change. Bus Strateg Environ 21(1):33–48
  33. Li JS, Zhou HW, Meng J, Yang Q, Chen B, Zhang YY (2018) Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: a case analysis for Beijing city. Appl Energy 226:1076–1086
  34. Li L, McMurray A, Li X, Gao Y, Xue J (2021) The diminishing marginal effect of R&D input and carbon emission mitigation. J Clean Prod 282:124423
  35. Li W, de Oliveira JAP (2021) Environmental governance for sustainable development in Asia. J Environ Manage 290:112622
  36. Liao L, Luo L, Tang Q (2015) Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. Br Account Rev 47(4):409–424
  37. Liu C, Hong T, Li H, Wang L (2018) From club convergence of per capita industrial pollutant emissions to industrial transfer effects: an empirical study across 285 cities in China. Energy Policy 121:300–313
  38. Luo L, Tang Q (2021) Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk. Account Fin 61(2):2891–2934
  39. Mahapatra SK, Schoenherr T, Jayaram J (2021) An assessment of factors contributing to firms’ carbon footprint reduction efforts. Int J Prod Econ 235:108073
  40. Mardini GH, Lahyani FE (2021) Impact of foreign directors on carbon emissions performance and disclosure: empirical evidence from France. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. Forthcoming
  41. Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Munoz SC (2014) Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account Rev 89(2):695–724
  42. Nuber C, Velte P (2021) Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass. Bus Strateg Environ 30(4):1958–1992
  43. Petrović P, Lobanov MM (2020) The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: evidence from sixteen OECD countries. J Clean Prod 248:119187
  44. Porter ME and Van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review September-October: 120–134
  45. Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2022). Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments? Review of Accounting Studies, 1–42.
  46. Ranson M, Stavins RN (2016) Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: learning from experience. Climate Policy 16(3):284–300
  47. Reinhardt FL (1999) Bringing the environment down to earth. Harv Bus Rev 77(4):149-149
  48. Sharma S (2000) Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manag J 43(4):681–697
  49. Shum WY, Ma N, Lin X, Han T (2021) The major driving factors of carbon emissions in China and their relative importance: an application of the LASSO model. Front Energy Res 9:435–442
  50. Slawinski N, Pinkse J, Busch T, Banerjee SB (2017) The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: a multi-level framework. Bus Soc 56(2):253–282
  51. Stanny E (2018) Reliability and comparability of GHG disclosures to the CDP by US electric utilities. Soc Environ Account J 38(2):111–130
  52. Sun J, Yin F, Altman E, Makosa L (2022) Effects of corporate financial distress on peer firms: do intra-industry non-distressed firms become more conditionally conservative?. Accounting and Business Research. Forthcoming.
  53. Villoria-Sáez P, Tam VW, del Río Merino M, Arrebola CV, Wang X (2016) Effectiveness of greenhouse-gas emission trading schemes implementation: a review on legislations. J Clean Prod 127:49–58
  54. Walley N, Whitehead B (1994) It’s not easy being green. Harv Bus Rev 72(3):46–52
  55. Wang H, Chen Z, Wu X, Nie X (2019) Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis?—Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method. Energy Policy 129:930–938
  56. Yang D, Wang AX, Zhou KZ, Jiang W (2019) Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: a managerial cognition perspective. J Bus Ethics 159(4):1147–1161
  57. Zheng Y, Ge C, Li X, Duan X, Yu T (2020) Configurational analysis of environmental information disclosure: evidence from China’s key pollutant-discharge listed companies. J Environ Manage 270:110671
  58. Zhu B, Xu C, Wang P, Zhang L (2022) How does internal carbon pricing affect corporate environmental performance? J Bus Res 145:65–77

MeSH Term

Carbon
Organizations
Motivation
China

Chemicals

Carbon

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0carbonemissionscorporatemodelfactorsLASSOScopeCorporateperformanceabsoluteregressionfinancial-levelkeydriverachievingsustainabilityidentificationinfluencefundamentalpromotingBaseddisclosureprojectCDPdatabaseintegrateleastshrinkageselectionoperatorfixedeffectsidentifydeterminantsFurthermorerankdeterminingaccordingimportancefindCapxentersmodelscontexts12playgreaterrole3internalincentivepoliciesemissionreductionbehaviorsimportantDifferentrelativefactors'debt-payingabilityvitalreferenceindicatorimpactdrivingemissions:applicationsurveydataDeterminantsFixed-effect

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.