Immunological considerations for laboratory staff and COVID-19 biosafety.

Ambroise Kouame Kintossou, Stephanie Villar, Zisis Kozlakidis
Author Information
  1. Ambroise Kouame Kintossou: Biobank, Pasteur Institute of Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
  2. Stephanie Villar: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France.
  3. Zisis Kozlakidis: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France.

Abstract

The vulnerability of healthcare and laboratory to potential infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has thus far been analyzed through the lens of the acute phase of the pandemic, including remote-based work, as well as emergency settings that are different from routine healthcare operations. However, as lockdowns ease and activities return to an identifiable pre-pandemic routine, the safety considerations also require to shift accordingly. As laboratory workers are likely to continue being exposed to unidentified SARS-CoV-2 positive samples through routine blood collection and processing operations, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might have to be re-considered as an occupational disease within this context. Additionally, as per many such occupational diseases, a surveillance system is implemented for the medium- and long-term. This manuscript presents the views on the possible surveillance scenarios for laboratory staff, viewed from an immunological and biosafety perspective.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Infect Control. 2020 Apr;48(4):368-374 [PMID: 31753548]
  2. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;10(10): [PMID: 36298499]
  3. Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 1;191(1):137-146 [PMID: 34652416]
  4. Lancet Microbe. 2022 Mar;3(3):e235-e240 [PMID: 34723229]
  5. Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Dec 01;95(12):831-841F [PMID: 29200524]
  6. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Mar;19(3):171-183 [PMID: 33057203]
  7. Med Lav. 2022 Apr 26;113(2):e2022022 [PMID: 35481576]
  8. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 28;7:429 [PMID: 32850915]
  9. Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980 [PMID: 34002090]
  10. Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 06;6:7952 [PMID: 26245473]
  11. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;41(10):1423-30 [PMID: 16231252]
  12. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7(3):174-195 [PMID: 34603749]
  13. Pathog Glob Health. 2021 May;115(3):133-134 [PMID: 33533705]
  14. JAMA. 2020 Oct 13;324(14):1389-1390 [PMID: 32936212]
  15. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 21;9(10): [PMID: 33096742]
  16. Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Oct;60(7):509-16 [PMID: 20871020]
  17. Am J Infect Control. 2022 Mar;50(3):361-363 [PMID: 34774894]
  18. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5788 [PMID: 33707646]
  19. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):142-7 [PMID: 19480580]
  20. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2118554 [PMID: 34319354]
  21. Vaccine. 2021 Feb 5;39(6):901-914 [PMID: 33451776]
  22. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 15;71(12):3182-3187 [PMID: 32594160]
  23. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1361-e1363 [PMID: 32791118]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0laboratoryroutineCOVID-19surveillancestaffbiosafetyImmunologicalhealthcareSARS-CoV-2operationsconsiderationsoccupationalvulnerabilitypotentialinfectionsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2virusthusfaranalyzedlensacutephasepandemicincludingremote-basedworkwellemergencysettingsdifferentHoweverlockdownseaseactivitiesreturnidentifiablepre-pandemicsafetyalsorequireshiftaccordinglyworkerslikelycontinueexposedunidentifiedpositivesamplesbloodcollectionprocessingcoronavirus disease 2019mightre-considereddiseasewithincontextAdditionallypermanydiseasessystemimplementedmedium-long-termmanuscriptpresentsviewspossiblescenariosviewedimmunologicalperspectivemonitoringLaboratoryOccupationalexposure

Similar Articles

Cited By