Quantifying the impact of the Philips recall on patients with sleep apnea and clinicians.

Rebecca Robbins, Lawrence J Epstein, Milena K Pavlova, Jay Iyer, Salma Batool-Anwar, Suzanne M Bertisch, Stuart F Quan
Author Information
  1. Rebecca Robbins: Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  2. Lawrence J Epstein: Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  3. Milena K Pavlova: Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  4. Jay Iyer: Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  5. Salma Batool-Anwar: Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  6. Suzanne M Bertisch: Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  7. Stuart F Quan: Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Philips Respironics issued a voluntary recall of positive airway pressure devices used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in June 2021. We surveyed sleep medicine clinicians from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine membership to assess the impact of the recall on clinicians and patients.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-six clinicians participated between June 2022 and November 2022. Participants reported their treatment recommendations for patients affected by the recall, their patients' behaviors regarding the recall, the recall's impact on them as clinicians and on their patients, and the approximate time their patients were waiting for a replacement device.
RESULTS: Clinicians most commonly reported first learning about the recall from Philips (25.0%), and patients most commonly first heard about the recall from news sources (34.5%). Most clinicians (62.4%) reported that they recommended patients continue using a recalled device. In comparison, only 9.3% of clinicians reported encouraging patients to stop using their recalled device. Clinicians reported that 59.9% of patients continued treatment with their recalled device, whereas 26.5% stopped treatment. Clinicians reported that over one-third of their patients were still waiting for a replacement machine. Most (86.8%) clinicians reported their stress levels were affected due to the recall, and 91.5% of clinicians reported the recall affected their patients' health and well-being. Most (83.3%) clinicians reported the recall affected their patients' trust in medicine.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians reported that the Philips recall impaired the vast majority of their patients' health and trust in medicine and that many patients were still waiting for replacement devices.
CITATION: Robbins R, Epstein LJ, Pavlova MK, et al. Quantifying the impact of the Philips recall on patients with sleep apnea and clinicians. . 2023;19(9):1677-1683.

Keywords

Grants

  1. K01 HL150339/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Mental Recall
Time
Learning
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0recallpatientscliniciansreportedPhilipssleepapneaimpactaffectedpatients'deviceCliniciansmedicinetreatmentwaitingreplacement5%recalleddevicesJune2022commonlyfirstusing93%stillhealthtrustQuantifyingSTUDYOBJECTIVES:Respironicsissuedvoluntarypositiveairwaypressureusedtreatobstructive2021surveyedAmericanAcademySleepMedicinemembershipassessMETHODS:Onehundredthirty-sixparticipatedNovemberParticipantsrecommendationsbehaviorsregardingrecall'sapproximatetimeRESULTS:learning250%heardnewssources34624%recommendedcontinuecomparisonencouragingstop599%continuedwhereas26stoppedone-thirdmachine868%stresslevelsdue91well-being83CONCLUSIONS:impairedvastmajoritymanyCITATION:RobbinsREpsteinLJPavlovaMKet al202319:1677-1683CPAPOSA

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)