Primary care patients' and providers' perspectives about an online weight management program integrated with population health management: Post-intervention qualitative results from the PROPS study.

Ronen Rozenblum, Barbara A De La Cruz, Nyryan V Nolido, Saffiya McNulty, Katherine D McManus, Florencia Halperin, Jason P Block, David W Bates, Heather J Baer
Author Information
  1. Ronen Rozenblum: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  2. Barbara A De La Cruz: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  3. Nyryan V Nolido: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. Saffiya McNulty: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  5. Katherine D McManus: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  6. Florencia Halperin: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  7. Jason P Block: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  8. David W Bates: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  9. Heather J Baer: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

Objective: To assess patients' and providers' attitudes about the online weight management program and population health management approach in the PROPS Study, which examined the effectiveness of these strategies in primary care.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 patients and nine providers. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed transcripts of the interviews to identify key themes.
Results: Most patients found the online program to be well-structured and easy to use, although a few noted that the information was overwhelming or could be more personalized. patients mentioned that the support from the population health managers was critical for their success, and several reported that they would have liked more involvement from their primary care provider or a dietitian. Providers also were satisfied with the interventions, and several stated that the population health management support was helpful because it added accountability. Providers suggested that the interventions could be improved by tailoring the information and integrating the online program with the electronic health record.
Conclusion: Most patients and providers were satisfied with the interventions, with several recommendations for improvements.
Innovation: These findings give additional information about patients' and providers' experience with this innovative approach for managing overweight and obesity in primary care.

Keywords

References

  1. Obes Res. 2004 Feb;12(2):320-9 [PMID: 14981225]
  2. Obes Rev. 2007 Sep;8(5):459-65 [PMID: 17716303]
  3. BMC Obes. 2018 Feb 12;5:7 [PMID: 29449953]
  4. Am J Public Health. 1995 May;85(5):722-6 [PMID: 7733438]
  5. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Oct;33(4):336-345 [PMID: 17888860]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1563-71 [PMID: 17035649]
  7. Obes Res. 2003 Oct;11(10):1168-77 [PMID: 14569041]
  8. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1959-68 [PMID: 22085317]
  9. JAMA. 2008 Mar 12;299(10):1139-48 [PMID: 18334689]
  10. Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):543-5 [PMID: 8610075]
  11. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):783-7 [PMID: 8179049]
  12. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):108-9 [PMID: 12554031]
  13. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Sep;26(9):1254-60 [PMID: 12187404]
  14. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Feb;72(1):98-108 [PMID: 23098133]
  15. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 Apr;21(4):197-206 [PMID: 19366378]
  16. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jun 1;63(11):2185-96 [PMID: 11417771]
  17. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012 Apr;6(2):120-134 [PMID: 23082235]
  18. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1503-1521 [PMID: 31152361]
  19. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Feb;18(2):308-13 [PMID: 19696764]
  20. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106026 [PMID: 32428586]
  21. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):107-17 [PMID: 25134692]
  22. Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(1):45-55 [PMID: 25406436]
  23. Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(4):1-62 [PMID: 28122658]
  24. Implement Sci. 2017 May 25;12(1):69 [PMID: 28545538]
  25. Obes Rev. 2010 Apr;11(4):306-21 [PMID: 19754633]
  26. Acad Med. 2004 Feb;79(2):156-61 [PMID: 14744717]
  27. JAMA. 2020 Nov 3;324(17):1737-1746 [PMID: 33141209]
  28. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Oct;4(10):821-8 [PMID: 27474214]
  29. Am J Public Health. 1999 May;89(5):764-7 [PMID: 10224993]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0managementhealthprogramcareonlinepopulationpatients'providers'primarypatientsinformationseveralinterventionsweightapproachPROPSinterviewsproviderssupportProviderssatisfiedPrimaryObjective:assessattitudesStudyexaminedeffectivenessstrategiesMethods:conductedsemi-structured22nineUsingthematicanalysisanalyzedtranscriptsidentifykeythemesResults:foundwell-structuredeasyusealthoughnotedoverwhelmingpersonalizedPatientsmentionedmanagerscriticalsuccessreportedlikedinvolvementproviderdietitianalsostatedhelpfuladdedaccountabilitysuggestedimprovedtailoringintegratingelectronicrecordConclusion:recommendationsimprovementsInnovation:findingsgiveadditionalexperienceinnovativemanagingoverweightobesityperspectivesintegratedmanagement:Post-interventionqualitativeresultsstudyObesityOnlineOverweightPopulationWeight

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.