Meta theories of technological innovation based on the analysis of classic texts.

Xuan Wei, Ranran Liu, Wei Chen
Author Information
  1. Xuan Wei: School of Statistics and Mathematics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, 250000, China.
  2. Ranran Liu: School of Technology and Business, Shandong Management University, Jinan 250022, China.
  3. Wei Chen: School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the classification of technological innovation meta-theories based on classical texts, as well as the relationships between various classifications. Both qualitative and quantitative methods are employed. From the perspective of technological innovation, using scientometric methods, 105 pieces of classic texts from the 1930s-2010s are extracted from the references of 3862 pieces of high-quality literature from the 1900s-2020s. As a result, based on a combination of qualitative data analysis and topic model analysis, we developed a typology with eight meta-theories of technological innovation, including performance-based, resource-based, knowledge-based, capability-based, network-based, technological-innovation-system, dual-innovation, and dynamic-sustainability views. Then we analyzed 1) the evolution, reification, and confusion relationships between different meta-theories; 2) the causes of technological innovation's concept jungle; and 3) an integrated framework of technological innovation meta-theories. This study analyzed the benefits of the meta-theoretical analysis on the future study of technological innovation. Additionally, the results of this study can help to measure technological innovation, construct new theories, and improve the efficiency of the connection between the practical problems of innovation and potentially useful theoretical frameworks.

Keywords

References

  1. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021 Mar 25;268:113572 [PMID: 33188899]
  2. Science. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379): [PMID: 29496846]
  3. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):915-24 [PMID: 22762253]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72 [PMID: 16275915]
  5. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Jul 29;: [PMID: 32729024]
  6. Sci Prog. 2022 Oct-Dec;105(4):368504221145648 [PMID: 36573795]
  7. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):278-283 [PMID: 27822148]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0innovationtechnologicalanalysisstudymeta-theoriesbasedtextsrelationshipsqualitativemethodspiecesclassicanalyzedtheoriesaimsinvestigateclassificationclassicalwellvariousclassificationsquantitativeemployedperspectiveusingscientometric1051930s-2010sextractedreferences3862high-qualityliterature1900s-2020sresultcombinationdatatopicmodeldevelopedtypologyeightincludingperformance-basedresource-basedknowledge-basedcapability-basednetwork-basedtechnological-innovation-systemdual-innovationdynamic-sustainabilityviews1evolutionreificationconfusiondifferent2causesinnovation'sconceptjungle3integratedframeworkbenefitsmeta-theoreticalfutureAdditionallyresultscanhelpmeasureconstructnewimproveefficiencyconnectionpracticalproblemspotentiallyusefultheoreticalframeworksMetaClassictextMeta-theoreticalTechnologicalTypology

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.