PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose is to review the evidence that has been collected with regard to the new classification of chronic pain. In 2022, the World Health Assembly endorsed the 11 th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), and with it a new classification of chronic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: The evidence from the formative field testing indicated that the categories were clearly delineated and the coverage of chronic pain excellent (<3% in remainder categories). Official WHO field tests showed that the classification works well within the technical parameters WHO classifications must conform to and outperformed the ICD-10 diagnoses in all respects. International field tests, in which clinicians diagnosed consecutive patients in settings of medium and high resources, showed substantial interrater reliability (κ = 0.596 to κ = 0.783) for the diagnoses and the clinicians rated their clinical utility as very high. Studies using complete hospital records demonstrated that with the information they contain, retrospective coding of the new diagnoses is possible and provides much more meaningful information than the ICD-10 diagnoses. SUMMARY: The evidence supports the use of the new classification and highlights its informational gains - using it will contribute to making chronic pain count in many contexts.
References
World Health Assembly. The 72nd World Health Assembly Resolution for ICD-11 Adoption 2019. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases . [Accessed 21 July 2023]
Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain 2015; 156:1003–1007.
Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain 2019; 160:19–27.
Aziz Q, Giamberardino MA, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic secondary visceral pain. Pain 2019; 160:69–76.
Bennett MI, Kaasa S, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic cancer-related pain. Pain 2019; 160:38–44.
Benoliel R, Svensson P, Evers S, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic secondary headache or orofacial pain. Pain 2019; 160:60–68.
Nicholas M, Vlaeyen JWS, Rief W, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain. Pain 2019; 160:28–37.
Perrot S, Cohen M, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain. Pain 2019; 160:77–82.
Scholz J, Finnerup NB, Attal N, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain. Pain 2019; 160:53–59.
Schug SA, Lavand’homme P, Barke A, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain. Pain 2019; 160:45–52.
Hay G, Korwisi B, Rief W, et al. Pain severity ratings in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases: a versatile tool for rapid assessment. Pain 2022; 163:2421–2429.
Jakob R. ICD-11-Adapting ICD to the 21st century. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2018; 61:771–777.
First MB, Pincus HA, Levine JB, et al. Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:946–954.
Keeley JW, Reed GM, Roberts MC, et al. Developing a science of clinical utility in diagnostic classification systems: field study strategies for ICD-11mental and behavioural disorders. Am Psychol 2016; 71:3–16.
Reed GM. Toward ICD-11: improving the clinical utility of WHO's international classification of mental disorders. Profess Psychol Res Pract 2010; 41:457–464.
Barke A, Korwisi B, Casser HR, et al. Pilot field testing of the chronic pain classification for ICD-11: the results of ecological coding. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:1239.
Zinboonyahgoon N, Luansritisakul C, Eiamtanasate S, et al. Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting. Pain 2021; 162:1995–2001.
Barke A, Korwisi B, Jakob R, et al. Classification of chronic pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11): results of the 2017 international World Health Organization field testing. Pain 2022; 163:e310–e318.
Korwisi B, Garrido Suarez BB, Goswami S, et al. Reliability and clinical utility of the chronic pain classification in the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases from a global perspective: results from India, Cuba, and New Zealand. Pain 2022; 163:e453–e462.
Korwisi B, Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A. Evaluation of the International Classification of Diseases-11 chronic pain classification: study protocol for an ecological implementation field study in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e825.
Korwisi B, Hay G, Attal N, et al. Classification algorithm for the International Classification of Diseases-11 chronic pain classification: development and results from a preliminary pilot evaluation. Pain 2021; 162:2087–2096.
Eiamtanasate S, Smithiseth K, Zinboonyahgoon N, et al. Invisible cost of pain management by the current International Classification of Diseases coding system, a study in a tertiary care inpatient setting. Pain 2023; [Online ahead of print].
Borchgrevink PC, Glette M, Woodhouse A, et al. A clinical description of chronic pain in a general population using ICD-10 and ICD-11 (The HUNT Pain Examination Study). J Pain 2022; 23:337–348.
Hornemann C, Schroder A, Ornbol E, et al. Application of ICD-11 among individuals with chronic pain: a post hoc analysis of the Stanford Self-Management Program. Eur J Pain 2020; 24:297–311.
Munk A, Jacobsen HB, Reme SE. Coping expectancies and disability across the new ICD-11 chronic pain categories: a large-scale registry study. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:1510–1522.
Korwisi B, Barke A, Rief W, et al. Chronic pain in the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases: users’ questions answered. Pain 2021.
Korwisi B, Barke A, Kharko A, et al. Not really nice: a commentary on the recent version of NICE guidelines [NG193: chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16 s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain] by the Pain Net. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e961.
Koechlin H, Whalley B, Welton NJ, Locher C. The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2019; 8:269.
Goebel A, Molloy A. Diagnosis of chronic primary pain in the context of structural deformity needs better definition. Pain 2021; 162:320.
Barke A, Rief W, Korwisi B, Treede R-D. Reply to Goebel and Molloy. Pain 2021; 162:322.
